From £15,885
A vast improvement on the old Beetle, but lacks the polish of the Golf

Our Verdict

Volkswagen Beetle
The Beetle will so often be bought on the basis of its looks. It is certainly more attractive than the old 'new Beetle'

The Volkswagen Beetle is only the third all-new model since the original launched in 1938. It is based on the Mk6 Golf, but the base car is far better

12 July 2011

What is it

The all-new Volkswagen Beetle – as first revealed in simultaneous presentations at the Shanghai and New York motor shows back in April.

The three door hatchback is planned to arrive in the UK in early 2012 as a replacement for today’s outdated 14 year old model. Pricing is yet to be announced, but expect a moderate increase to accompany increased levels of standard equipment.

With a bold new exterior design, larger dimensions, extensively reworked interior, greater space, more contemporary underpinnings and a range of more powerful engines – including a top-of-the-line 197bhp turbocharged 2.0-litre, Volkswagen hopes to attract a greater number of male buyers – at least that’s the message it is spreading ahead of the start of sales.

What’s it like?

From an exterior design standpoint the new Beetle impresses. From the very first glance, you’re aware more time and thought has gone into perfecting its appearance than with its predecessor.

Step inside and you’re confronted by an unusually high dashboard that has been styled to replicate that of the original Beetle – complete with an old fashioned glovebox compartment in the facia.

We drove the 197bhp turbocharged 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol model, equipped with an optional six-speed DSG (dual shift) gearbox. It’s essentially the same driveline used by the sixth-generation Golf GTi. Not a bad basis, then.

With 206lb ft arriving at just 1700rpm, the new top-of-the-line Beetle is quick off the line and satisfyingly flexible across a wide range of revs. The engine is eager in nature, spinning to its 7000rpm redline smoothly, determinedly and without any undue harshness up high.

Despite a gain in kerb weight of 96kg over the old 148bhp turbocharged 1.8-litre model it replaces in the line-up at 1364kg, in gear performance is solid, if not outstanding. Volkswagen claims 0-62mph in 7.5sec or 0.6sec slower than the 44kg lighter Golf GTi. Top speed is put at 139mph.

Ride quality is not up to Volkswagen’s usual high standards. The new Beetle fails to deliver the overall composure of the Golf over a wide range of surfaces. The steering, a new electro-mechanical arrangement, also lacks for the precision off centre.

The new Beetle does, however, hang on well in corners. Grip is vastly improved over the old model, a result that can be attributed not only to the widened tracks but a decision to provide the new model with larger wheels and tyres boasting greater contact area. In this respect, Volkswagen’s claims of added sportiness are warranted.

Should I buy one?

Like its direct predecessor, the new Beetle will be bought more on the statement made by throwback styling than any other single factor. Seen up close, it is a much more confident looking car than before – something that is not only a reflection of the actual design of the exterior but the more surefooted stance brought on by its wider tracks. It also imparts a higher quality feel, even if some of its interior trims look cheap.

But whether looks and a feeling of added quality are enough to draw in greater number of male buyers as Volkswagen claims it will remains to be seen. Dynamically, it is a vast improvement on the old Beetle. But if first impressions are anything to go by it continues to lack the polish of the Golf, which in pure driving terms is superior in many ways.

Volkswagen Beetle 2.0 TSI

Price: n/a; Top Speed: 139mph; 0-62mph: 7.5sec; Economy: n/a; Co2: n/a; Kerb weight: 1346kg; Engine: 1998cc, in-line 4, petrol; Power: 197bhp; Torque: 206lb ft at 1700rpm; Gearbox: 6 speed manual

Join the debate

Comments
23

12 July 2011

Surely fitting such a powerful engine to car bought for its retro styling defeats the idea of owning a modern version of a historic car. A 1400 to 1600 cc engine with less than 100 bhp fitted with a manual gearbox would be more in keeping with this cars likely use.

12 July 2011

Never thought I'd say this, but I like the look of this. It might only be subtle changes and evolutionary, but they've managed to make it look "right". Nice dash, too. Not that I'd ever buy one!

12 July 2011

It only looks a little better than before,the interior is ugly and cheap looking and it doesnt drive as good as the donor Golf ! Game over i think !!!!

12 July 2011

Ho Ho! what a minger.. rest in peace PT Cruiser, VW take up the colours for dog of the year, the interior would raise a chuckle at Proton HQ

Bunging in the 200bhp engine straight off just goes to show VW have no faith in it so it needing something extra. They used to do the same with the old dog Bora and let it have more power so someone would love it.

Nope don't like it.

12 July 2011

Missed opportunity again? I DO get it. It's a niche product, it looks better than before, but the ride kills it (and the cheap interior), why couldn't it be a different quality inside, ride BETTER than the golf and not be such a sporty drive, that's what it's about. The golf has to compete with other hatches, this doesn't, it has to appeal to someone looking for something different where practicality and ultimate grip aren't the main priorities.

12 July 2011

So it's heavier than a Golf, slower than a Golf, less spacious than a Golf, has a lower quality less atractive interior than a Golf and rides worse than a Golf. VW can do form and function as demonstrated by the Scirocco which makes the new Beetle even more disappointing.

DKW

12 July 2011

Men are always happy to compromise some practicality for a car with the right atmosphere. Regrettably, this isn't the right atmosphere. It remains a car for women who don't know about cars.

12 July 2011

[quote Greg Kable] With a bold new exterior design... [/quote]

Where is this 'bold' exterior then Greg? Because it's not in the photos that accompany the article.

I had an original 1302S a couple of decades ago and still long for it back even now. This thing, a consummate pastiche, sums up everything that is so utterly wrong with 'retro'.

To be honest, I'm glad it's sh1t. I've gone right off VW in the last 5 years.

12 July 2011

Hmm, it's hardly 'The People's car' is it? Give me an original rear air cooled engined version any day.....

13 July 2011

[quote Will86]

So it's heavier than a Golf, slower than a Golf, less spacious than a Golf, has a lower quality less atractive interior than a Golf and rides worse than a Golf. VW can do form and function as demonstrated by the Scirocco which makes the new Beetle even more disappointing.

[/quote]

....and its also a brand new model, whereas the Golf is almost due for replacement. How did they manage to get it so wrong?

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2016 Audi A3 Sportback e-tron UK review
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    First UK drive finds the facelifted A3 Sportback e-tron remains a first-rate plug-in hybrid that is packed with tech if a little short on driver appeal
  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka