Renault Fluence Z.E.

Richard Bremner
7 June 2010

What is it?

This is the most conventional of Renault’s four electric vehicle offerings, a Focus-class four-door saloon complementing the Zoe hatchback, the Kangoo van and the Twizy city car.

An electric conversion of the conventional Fluence, it’s propelled by a 94bhp electric motor delivering a stout 167lb ft of torque through a single speed gearbox. Renault is making no claims for the 0-62mph sprint yet, but it has an 87mph top speed.

The Fluence’s body has been slightly lengthened to house the 250kg lithium-ion battery packed behind the rear seats, its weight rising 50kg to top 1453kg. The batteries have a claimed range of 100 miles, and can be recharged in around six to eight hours from a domestic power supply, quick-charged from a three-phase fast-charge supply in 30 minutes or by using Renault’s Quickdrop infrastructure, which will allow the battery to be swapped for a fully charged pack in three minutes.

That said, there will be few Quickdrop stations in France to start with – there only will be a couple in Paris by 2011 - while Britain is an unknown.

What’s it like?

Paris was where we sampled this prototype Fluence, which is almost limo-like in its serenity besides being smooth, brisk and simple to drive.

As impressive as any of this is the feeling that this prototype was close to the finished thing, its electrically-powered air conditioning fully functioning, its instrument pack looking production ready. The floor-mounted transmission lever is all you need move once you’ve twisted the key to power up, selecting drive producing the same creep that you’ll encounter with a conventional automatic.

Tread the accelerator and the Fluence steps away briskly, but with a calming silence that makes negotiating heavy traffic a more restful experience, not least because the powertrain is so quiet – there’s no milk-float whine.

Yet despite this calm the Fluence is more than capable of getting ahead in traffic, a firm stab at the accelerator producing enough thrust to have its front tyres screeching for grip.

Release the throttle, and you’ll notice more deceleration-effect than you’ll find in most cars as battery regeneration kicks in, although this is nothing like as pronounced as it is in the Mini E. But it still provides the entertainment of determining when you should lift off to come to a rest at the next obstacle without touching either brake or accelerator, a pusuit that also saves energy.

The elephant-in-the-room issue – range – certainly impinges, because you have only 100 miles, but the distance to recharge indicator seemed to fall slowly as we edged through traffic, and with accuracy too, the six kilometer drop matching the distance we actually covered.

If the Renault’s power delivery is immensely refined, bar an occasional soft jolt as you move off, its ride is less so. There’s more jostling over bumps than there ought to be, and although there wasn’t much scope for speeding about on this test, it seems likely that the 250kg battery pack will make itself felt when you’re hard-charging a bend.

Should I buy one?

Renault says that the Fluence will cost around £19,000, with £85 of monthly battery lease costs to pay on top – pretty reasonable considering its advanced technology and the very low running costs that owners will enjoy. Its biggest drawback is that 100 mile range, which makes it vastly less versatile than a conventional car.

But if all your commuting is short, or you have a second conventional car, then it could make sense, especially as it provides a more pleasant way to cut through the urban crawl. It’s spacious and well-kitted and though the ride isn’t great, this feels like a mature product.

Question marks still hang over the real-world range besides the realities of recharging, but this is an electric car that gets closer to convincing.

 

Join the debate

Comments
17

Re: Renault Fluence Z.E.

1 year 50 weeks ago

Would make an ideal car for the 2010 Tour de France - no pollution for the riders and Skoda's sponsorship is getting boring. Only problem is its range is shorter than most Tour stages, and mountain stages would be off limits of course, and most of the riders would out-sprint it, putting bikes on the roof would be a no-no, as the drag would halve the range, and the hot weather in the South would drain the battery thru aircon, but minus those few quibbles, an ideal car.

Re: Renault Fluence Z.E.

1 year 50 weeks ago

Frankly I dont think electric cars will be a viable propositon for some time to come yet . I am also disturbed by the concept of quick drop . The most valuable part of the car can be removed in 3 minutes . If electric cars ever become commonplace will quick drop become "quick nick " for some of our more shady entrepeneurs . 3 minutes to earn about £10 grands worth of battery . Not bad !


Thankfully until there is another breakthrough in battery tech I dont see these cars ever being realistic .

Re: Renault Fluence Z.E.

1 year 50 weeks ago

£85 a month plus electricy costs is not cheaper than an efficient petrol engine, say a 1.2 turbo, which would have a 400 mile range.

Re: Renault Fluence Z.E.

1 year 50 weeks ago

Let me get this straight, Renault have called one of their zero emission care the Flatuence!

Re: Renault Fluence Z.E.

1 year 50 weeks ago

I also don't believe for a second that it wouldnt cost far more to charge and use one of these cars for a month than it would to fuel a small turbo petrol or any diesel.



The electricity companies would have a field day, god only knows what kind of monthly bills people would recieve. That's before you take into account £85 a month to maintain some batteries and the fact that the cars cost a fortune to buy new.



Why does the media insist on pedalling these cars as if they are 'the next big thing'. Not any time soon they wont be

Re: Renault Fluence Z.E.

1 year 50 weeks ago

Following on from other comments.

£85 per month buys 70 litres of diesel
£19,000 on a Bluemotion Golf

Battery is 22Kwh so assuming some charging losses, I pay 12p per Kwh, lets assume it needs charging each night, half a charge, is about £39 per month or another 32.5 litres.

So in the renault you travel 50 miles each day for your half charge, or 1500 miles per month.

In the golf you would travel 1669 miles, both assuming ideal conditions.

It seems this is pretty economical assuming renaults claimed range is achievable on the euro combined cycle.

The issue would be if you only travelled 20 miles per day as most of your cost is fixed.

Re: Renault Fluence Z.E.

1 year 50 weeks ago

I'm not convinced by your figures for electricity, i dont believe something requiring that much power to charge works out at £39 per month - BUT try as i might I cant quite figure out how to check them (i managed to calculate £8 a night for half a charge but i dare say that isnt accurate), however even using the figures given:



£124.00 / month to travel 1500 miles = 8.27p / mile


£85.00 / month to travel 1699 miles = 5p / mile



Thats a fair old difference over the course of a year. Thats before getting into the whole story of half a charge never lasting 50 miles and the golf not returning claimed mpg etc

Re: Renault Fluence Z.E.

1 year 50 weeks ago

The 1669 miles for the golf was based on the £124 worth of fuel. I looked at my last bill and paid 12p per kwh, from a web search the battery in the fluence is 22kwh, so would cost £2.64 for a full charge. (£1.32 for a half charge - 50 miles) The bit I have assumed here is 100% charging efficiency. I doubt that is possible so that may bump up the cost. At 50% efficiency it would cost £5.28 for a full charge.

Basically though if you were able to use this car for 99 miles per day it would be very cheap. If you use it for 20 miles per day it would be very expensive. As using these cars for longer journeys is not possible this fits a very narrow niche of people that travel about 50 - 60 miles per day every day, no more and no less.

Live in the real world and use your car a lot sometimes and not a lot other times and electric cars are neither cheap or useful.

Re: Renault Fluence Z.E.

1 year 50 weeks ago

PhilM4000 wrote:

Following on from other comments.

£85 per month buys 70 litres of diesel
£19,000 on a Bluemotion Golf

Battery is 22Kwh so assuming some charging losses, I pay 12p per Kwh, lets assume it needs charging each night, half a charge, is about £39 per month or another 32.5 litres.

So in the renault you travel 50 miles each day for your half charge, or 1500 miles per month.

In the golf you would travel 1669 miles, both assuming ideal conditions.

It seems this is pretty economical assuming renaults claimed range is achievable on the euro combined cycle.

The issue would be if you only travelled 20 miles per day as most of your cost is fixed.

Comparing a modern turbo diesel to electric car running costs is all very well, but you haven't factored in the fact that an electric car has a far simpler drivetrain (in fact, very few moving parts). There are no high pressure pumps, no complex engine management systems, no stupid DSG gearbox, no particulate filter, no unreliable and expensive to replace turbo, no exhaust system, etc. Due to all of this, the electric car will prove cheaper to service and more reliable. Anybody comparing running costs need to factor all of this in.

Re: Renault Fluence Z.E.

1 year 50 weeks ago

And what will be the price of the petrol in several years?

For Le Tour de France, why not. But can it follow the bikes?

Please register or login to post a comment.

Our Verdict

The Renault Fluenze ZE is a C-segment saloon and is a solid way to kick off Renault's electric vehicle product offensive

  • First Drive

    Renault Fluence ZE

    First electric Renault isn’t likely to make much of a mark in the UK
  • First Drive

    Renault Fluence ZE

    A comfortable, practical and impressive EV and a solid way to kick off Renault’s commitment to an all-electric range

Driven this week