From £24,780
The best engine in the range

Our Verdict

Audi A5
The Audi A5 is a elegant 3-series sized car, available as a coupe, hatchback or cabriolet

The Audi A5 is a classy coupé, hatchback and cabriolet, but are there talents beneath the pretty bodywork?

What is it?

The Audi A5 2.0 TSI, which features a 2.0-litre blown motor featuring Audi’s more sophisticated ‘Valvelift’ induction technology.

The engine is available in two states of tune – 178bhp and 208bhp – and with either front- or Quattro four-wheel drive; it’s the more powerful Quattro we’re testing here.

What’s it like?

We thought the 1.8-litre turbo version of this car was good; the 2.0-litre’s even better, and makes the A5 fast, refined and economical too.

Its 208bhp may not sound like a lot, but it’s torque that provides this car’s zealous performance. There’s 258lb ft of the stuff available from 1500- to 4200rpm, and in addition to making this car capable of scrambling to 62mph in 6.5sec and hitting 153mph flat out it gives prodigious mid-range urge.

Quite why you’d ever buy a 3.2-litre petrol V6 in the light of that, which is thirstier, slower, higher on CO2, and only has 243lb ft of twist, seems mysterious to put it mildly.

Point it down your nearest interesting road and you’ll find this car feels planted and precise to drive. The Quattro permanent four-wheel drive gives it an aura of invincible sure-footedness, and though it’s clearly not quite as agile as a 3-series coupe, the A5 generates real satisfaction for the driver in its own way.

The engine feels a little reluctant at high revs, but only because it generates so much torque lower in the range.

You’ll need to be on a long and conservative run to get anywhere near Audi’s claim of 38.2mpg for fuel economy; our test route, which took in a mix of urban roads and motorways, showed that 32mpg will be closer to your everyday return. But for such a big-performing car, that’s not to be sniffed at.

Should I buy one?

If you want the A5 with the broadest catalogue of talents (we’d count refinement, decent economy, handsome looks, a spectacularly turned-out cabin, pace and sporting appeal among them), and you want it at the right price, look no further.

The same caveats apply here as they do throughout the A5 range; sport suspension compromises the car’s ride quality too much to be worth the outlay, but if you go for standard springs you’ll end up with a car that’s comfortable to ride in as well as being enjoyable to drive.

A 3.0-litre TDi has marginally better economy, but on a like-for-like specification basis, the six-pot diesel will cost you over £3000 more and it’s not quite as hushed. And though it’s slightly faster, the TDi doesn’t feel as athletic to drive.

Join the debate

Comments
5

7 November 2008

I'd still pick the 3-series coupe over this (predictably boring, I know), but I'm liking the A5 more and more; especially this model.

7 November 2008

Having driven this model in front drive trim, 208 bhp is a bit much through the front wheels and it torque steers a bit but this is a proper blokes coupe and there is a real sense of occasion from the cabin. The BMW is a better driving tool ultimately, but in every other respect and overall I would havve the Audi and with this engine.

Think I will wait a few years until they are worthless though, it will be a great 2nd hand buy.

SBK

10 November 2008

They are also taking orders for the 2.0 diesel version now for February delivery, but the 3% loading on diesel for company car tax takes it too far away from the 3 series. I agree having driven the A5 and 3 Series back to back the 3 is a more involved drive and the A5 is more of a grand tourer. The 3 is just so boring both externally and in the cabin and needs a makeover ASAP, whereas the A5 is a sheer delight inside, which after all is where you spend all your time stuck on the gridlocked network infrastructure, namely our road system!

On balance I think the Audi has it on looks and quality of build even though the BMW is better to drive, add that to the exclusivity of the A5 compared to the repmobile and I think I will be choosing the 2.0 TFSI Quattro Sport. So 22% tax it is then as opposed to 18%.

10 November 2008

I'm beginning to think it's me. And it probably is. But I am slap bang in the middle of the target market for this kind of car and it peers from BMW, MB, Porsche etc. and they just bore me to the point where I can hardly be bothered to read the eight paragraph review. Another pretty competent, inoffensively styled, vaguely sporty, slightly green, quite safe, slightly aspirational premium-ish German coupe with a price tag that is just a little too ambitious in the current climate and an interior which is impressive but smells too much like a tannery. Frankly, yawning is too much effort. 6/10. Must try harder.

11 November 2008

this is engine is so marvellous - it puts bmw's rather boring four-cylinder-engines to shame.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2016 Audi A3 Sportback e-tron UK review
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    First UK drive finds the facelifted A3 Sportback e-tron remains a first-rate plug-in hybrid that is packed with tech if a little short on driver appeal
  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka