Currently reading: Porsche to challenge C-Charge
Porsche GB to take legal action to quash new congestion charge scheme

Porsche GB has announced that it will take Transport for London to court in an attempt to have the new congestion-charging scheme stopped.Andy Goss, Managing Director of Porsche GB, maintains that the new C-Charge is "simply unjust. Thousands of car owners driving a huge range of cars will be hit by a disproportionate tax which is clear will have a very limited effect on CO2 emissions.” Porsche has stated that it will write to the Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, asking for a rethink on the new scheme. He must respond within 14 days stating that he will act on the request or Porsche GB will begin a judicial review against TFL.If the congestion charge plans go ahead in October, as planned, all cars producing over 225g/km of CO2 will be charged £25 per day.The 2.7-litre Cayman and Boxster are the cleanest Porsche models on sale, producing 222g/km, whilst the Cayenne Turbo tops the CO2 chart at 358g/km. However, a new Porsche hybrid system is due to go on sale in the Cayenne SUV in 2010, with a hybrid Panamera following not long after.And that's another reason Porsche wants to keep the current charging scheme, which sees hybrids gain automatic free entry to London. The new C-Charge scraps that rule and applies the charge solely on CO2 output. Cars producing less than 225g/km will be charged £8, whilst vehicles producing less than 120g/km go free. Plus, any cars with an engine capacity of 3.0-litres or over that are registered before 2001 will also receive the maximum £25 daily penalty.If legal action is taken by Porsche, it will be to prevent the new scheme going ahead, leaving the current scheme intact.

Read Hilton Holloway's blog on why Porsches don't pollute by clicking here.

Join the debate

Comments
23
Add a comment…
stevo27 29 March 2008

Re: Porsche to sue over C-Charge

The point here surely is that a cars CO2 emissions doesn't tell the whole story on their own. Who pollutes more - Mr Mondeo man driving 25,000 miles or Mr Porsche man driving 5,000?

I can accept a charge based on usage of roads but not simply because I prefer a nicer/faster car of choice. Trouble is usage charge means monitoring which means more state control mechanisms which means less freedom ................

Jaggie 12 March 2008

Re: Porsche to sue over C-Charge

True and he should include the LTI TX4 in the £25 charge since they emit 233g/km.

I can't see why the 'polluters' should be exempt. your reference to the Buses emissions, I agree it's not much of a difference to justify the Con Charge.

Jaggie 25 February 2008

Re: Porsche to sue over C-Charge

Richard Lyle wrote:
It will be reasonably easy to avoid paying the £25 charge

Yeah just have a Porsche 911 taxi!