Chinese firm could reopen talks with GM for Saab

Chinese car maker Geely, which is currently the preferred bidder for Volvo, has admitted it has also talked to General Motors about buying Saab.

Geely Auto executive director Lawrence Ang told Automotive News that the "battered" US and European economy had resulted in buying opportunities for the Chinese car maker, and that engines and component suppliers are in the frame.

When asked whether Geely would reopen negotiations with General Motors for Saab, Ang replied, "Who knows?"

Merging Volvo and Saab has often been floated as a way of consolidating the struggling Swedish car industry, but few industry analysts think that merging two such strongly individual businesses would be a feasible move.

Twitter - follow all the latest Saab reviews, news and video

Join the debate


8 December 2009

Might be efficient but essentially are'nt they really aiming to sell to the same people? Somehow the brands need to be distinguishable.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • First Drive
    27 November 2015
    We try the turbocharged 1.0-litre petrol version of the Golf Bluemotion. If you're not doing mega miles, it's a better bet than the diesel
  • 2015 Mercedes-AMG A45
    First Drive
    27 November 2015
    Mercedes couldn't let the Audi RS3 get away with having more power than its AMG A45. As part of a wholesale A-Class facelift, it now has 376bhp and a host of other revisions
  • First Drive
    25 November 2015
    More powerful Clubsport version of Volkswagen's iconic hot hatch proves thoroughly entertaining on our track-only first drive in Portugal
  • First Drive
    25 November 2015
    Suzuki has added an automatic diesel powertrain to its S-Cross crossover line-up. Does it offer a compelling choice over the manual versions?
  • First Drive
    24 November 2015
    Alpina’s D3 saloon and estate benefit from the latest BMW 3 Series updates. We've always loved it, but is it still as beguiling as ever in this latest form?