FIND A CAR REVIEW

Advertisement

Ads by Google


Page 1 of 1 (6 items)
Sort posts Rate this thread
  • Mitsubishi Evo X

    Dec 19, 2007 5:22 PM

    What is it?


    Version 10 of the car that was supposed to provide the same halo effect to Mitsubishi’s dowdy range of cars as the VW Golf GTi does to the Golf model line-up. But never managed anything like the same success.


    This is the first time anyone has driven the Evo X in the UK; its performance on our roads will be the benchmark against which the new Subaru Impreza STi will be measured when it comes to Britain in February.


    Historically the Evo has always been a sh...Read the full article

    • jl4069
    • Joined Dec 19, 2007
    • 542 Posts
    • Status: Offline

    Re: Mitsubishi Evo X

    Dec 19, 2007 5:30 PM

     "An Audi S3 feels just as quick as this car (even if the numbers suggest it shouldn’t) and yet its fit and finish are in a different league."

    Really don't get the logic here. Good Impreza's and Evo's handle much better than

    VW/Audi hatches. They are more progressive, more tactile, and have better wheel travel to

    handle any road. Lets not be so flippant and disregard over ten years of nothing but the

    highest praise for the handling of these cars. Its like you write stream-of-consciousness.

     

    • Frawls
    • Joined Nov 07, 2007
    • 19 Posts
    • Status: Offline

    Re: Mitsubishi Evo X

    Dec 19, 2007 8:18 PM

    jl4069:

     "An Audi S3 feels just as quick as this car (even if the numbers suggest it shouldn’t) and yet its fit and finish are in a different league."

    Really don't get the logic here. Good Impreza's and Evo's handle much better than

    VW/Audi hatches. They are more progressive, more tactile, and have better wheel travel to

    handle any road. Lets not be so flippant and disregard over ten years of nothing but the

    highest praise for the handling of these cars. Its like you write stream-of-consciousness."

     I think he means from a seat of the pants performance perspective. Certainly the S3 has stunning mid range performance thanks to its full torque arriving at only 2,200 rpms, which is  a lot earlier than either the EVO or the new Scooby. Also Audi traditionally under-quote their bhp and torque figures so maybe this is why they feel similarly quick. Don't forget the latest generation of EVO and Scooby have been mapped for far smoother, progressive power delivery so they do not feel anywhere as frantic as their forebearers.

    These cars are bought by people for whom the choice of performance car is limited to one. You are either an EVO fan or a Scooby die hard and the S3 doesn't get a look in as it trys to be a car for all occasions whereas the other two have one single focus and it sure as hell isn't soft touch plastics and nappa leather!

     Frawls
     

     

     
    • antifa
    • Joined Jan 27, 2008
    • 1 Posts
    • Status: Offline

    Re: Mitsubishi Evo X

    Jan 27, 2008 1:30 PM

    i guess this is a quite a biased report agains Evos. How can you compare an Evo with an S3? Any Evo handles much better and performs better. Evos are four wheel drive and S3s are front wheel drive. Evos are rally bred and S3s are just hatchbacks with stranger engines. So case dismissed

  • Re: Mitsubishi Evo X

    Feb 27, 2008 9:03 PM

    antifa:
    Evos are four wheel drive and S3s are front wheel drive.
     

    Not wanting to stick up for a fancy Golf here, but the Audi S3 does have four wheel drive...

    Sold hundreds, only bought 7!
  • Re: Mitsubishi Evo X

    Mar 21, 2008 10:01 AM

    As correctly pointed out the Audi S3 is four wheel drive.   Where it does win is that it's a prestige brand which will keep it's residual value.   You can also get a performance boost easily, and Audi garages will do it with a warranty too.   However, the S3 and the whole of the A3 range is in desperate need of a ground up refresh.   I looked at one and the fantastic sports seats and nimble little steering wheel were both extras adding 3k to the car’s cost.   The Golf R32 looks better than the A3 if you must go VAG.

     

    Main competition for the Evo X is, as it always seems to be, the Subaru Impreza STi.   Both are new models, but where as Mitsubishi have gone with a known format Subaru have decided to move their focus to the world of hatch backs.   The new Impreza isn’t distinctive enough a model to compete in such a busy market, basic WRX looks no better than a Mazda 3 and a Focus ST would be a better buy.   STi looks better, but Subaru have decided not to put on 18” wheels, rather smaller ones which look cheap and detract from it’s looks.   Changing is a £1,800 option which removes the only advantage the new STi had over the Evo X – price.

     

    I’m in the process of buying a new car after driving a Subaru WRX with PPP for a number of years.   As pleased with the car as I am, I just can’t bring myself to buy the STi.   I’m giving serious consideration to the Evo X, it’s current the favourite option.   Sorry Subaru, but you did raise the white flag to Mitsubishi.

     
Page 1 of 1 (6 items)
Back to top

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 8.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>