I know this will not be a popularist view, but if you listened to what he actually said you would be much clearer in the case of TATA (Jaguar) and Vauxhall. He has stated that money is on the table, right now you cannot push money any where as you right now do not know which way its going to move. The ownership deal (which is what he said) needs to be there in principle and for that you have to wait. Then at that point of the deal you know the detail and you have a framework on which to base talks.
Vauxhall is a commercial transaction not a government transaction no matter what anyone says. As for TATA (Jaguar), the TATA group has money and as has been shown, the UK gov. (and quite rightly so) said if we underwrite you money we want some sort of guarentee (that is nornal business) and quite right too; TATA all of a sudden then sells some shares and starts funding JLR itself; well then why did it need the money? This is business not some lucky dip lottery shop.
Some of you people on here make me laugh; first you want the government to be strong, then you want it to look after the UK, then you want it to throw money into stuff without looking after the UK, then you want it to support only your pet projects at the expense of other sectors, then you slag it off for supporting the one sector (the banks that are needed by everyone); there are so many double standards in your comments its untrue; you want to try reading what some of you guys write; some of you write utter pants.