So the upshot of this test is that the new 7-series has "clumsy" handling, but pretty good ride and refinement. Yet only a couple of weeks ago in another test Autocar found that the new 7-series was "top of the class" for handling, but had under par ride and refinement (see here http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/FirstDrives/BMW-7-Series-750Li/236015/ ).
So which is it?
It's disparity and inconsistency in testing/reporting of cars, which undermines the credibility and veracity of car magazines and makes you wonder if subjectivity is the order of the day, instead of objective and balanced testing. I say this because on occasions I get the feeling that Autocar writers decide they are going to dislike a car, no matter what. In this case the new 7-series was obviously never going to be allowed to beat the perennial class leader, Autocar's beloved S-Class. The magazine's testers were going to slagg it off, even if they ended up contradicting each other on the car's strengths and weaknesses.
Maybe I'm talking cobblers, but hey, I can be subjective and biased too.