Autocar:
The vital stats are promising enough, with 168bhp and 258lb of torque - 30bhp and 28lb ft more go than the existing TDI 140.
Erm, not according to Volkswagen(vw.co.uk):
TDI 140 236 lb-ft, TDI 170 258 lb-ft, 22 lb-ft more not 28.
Quote: "There’s very little to dislike about the Tiguan TDI 170, but we’d like to think there’s room for a faster halo model to top the range and take advantage of the Tiguan’s decent chassis and handling."
A halo model? What about the 2.0 TSI 200(the Golf GTI engine) version? Or even the 2.0 TSI 170? - 0-60mph 8.5 secs, 125mph top speed, equal to the TDI 170.
Quote: "In fact, the 170 isn’t even all that much more expensive to buy than the lesser 140. That means it’ll probably be a no-brain choice for many customers "
'isn't even all that much more expensive'? £2,200? (£20,495 v £22,695) Twenty-two hundred notes may be a 'no-brain choice' to you, Mr Powell, but not to most I warrant, particularly for a modest 28bhp and 22 lb-ft increase. Surely a 'chip' firm would give more bang for buck from chipping, presuming the internals of the 140/170 TDI engines are the same.