Nissan originally quoted a ~7:37 time for the NS. Then, magically, even though Nissan had been running non-stop development with the car against their benchmark (997 turbo), they were able to shave 8s off this time...
I would agree that there are a lot of videos from various mags all pretty much saying that it will beat almost anything else on a track, but physics don't help explain this.
I was rummaging throug some old Autocar mags, when I came across an article written by Steve Sutcliffe in the 14 May '08 magazine titled "Do the times 'Ring true'. In this editorial he states:
"More than that, I've driven the latest GT-R and although it is quick with a capital F, I've also driven the new Porsche 911 GT2 (the car whose record the GT-R has supposedly just beaten) and I'm certain that - in standard tune and on factory-fit tyres - it would be quicker than the GT-R around the 'Ring. Yet Nissan is claiming to have sliced over three seconds from the GT2's time. One question: what sort of tyres was the car using when it recorded the lap? Feel free to draw your own conclusion."
Now, more recently in the video section, he has just shown that it will smoke a Gallardo LP-560...