Would I regret this......

26 replies [Last post]
iamthestig's picture
Offline
Joined:
20 April 2008
Posts: 506

 

Clicky

I am thinking of getting this as a weekend/summer toy. 

I figured that I'd only have to pay 6 months tax a year and with tiny milage insurance shouldnt be too bad.

I want 4 seats as have a little un. 

Anything better for similar money - has to be 4 seat convertable with sub 6 seconds to 60.

Here's to the crazy ones......

Offline
Joined:
28 July 2008
Posts: 4254

You'd regret not doing it.

You know, I do believe that is a 'pec'...

Rich_uk's picture
Offline
Joined:
20 December 2008
Posts: 1361

Lesia44 wrote:

You'd regret not doing it.

Absolutely. Regret the things you do, not the things you don't do! Wink

The Autocar forum has gone so join some of us at thecarexpert.co.uk to continue the debate! 

The Colonel's picture
Offline
Joined:
6 November 2007
Posts: 1997

Honestly?  For use and running you describe, you'd probably not regret it, but I'd spend a bit more time looking for an E30 that could do as well - though you may struggle, on reasonable money, to find something sub 6 seconds.

If I knew what I was getting into, I wouldn't have done it...and I would have been wrong.

Offline
Joined:
15 May 2012
Posts: 171

That combination of dark exterior and light interior looks great.

I presume that you have some spare cash left over to pay for the surgery that will be needed to remove the grin from your face? Smile

_________________________

BMW 3 GT - All the car you need.

Offline
Joined:
20 November 2009
Posts: 358

I'm sure a BMW Convertible would be a good car if you like that sort of thing. I don't, personally.

That said, most are thrashed to within an inch of their lives. Be careful with any purchase for that reason. Cheap, fast cars are usually going to wind up with unsympathetic owners.

Offline
Joined:
17 July 2009
Posts: 2583

mrcliodCi wrote:

That said, most are thrashed to within an inch of their lives. Be careful with any purchase for that reason. Cheap, fast cars are usually going to wind up with unsympathetic owners.

What information do you have to back up that claim that they're mostly thrashed to within an inch of their lives? Mostly they're bought by 30 or 40 somethings who are  reasonably well off people who are more likely to look after their cars, driven respectfully and serviced properly. As they come down in price they're still not bought by the Corsa brigade who couldn't afford the insurance premiums anyway.

artill's picture
Offline
Joined:
19 December 2008
Posts: 2545

Evo_ermine wrote:

mrcliodCi wrote:

That said, most are thrashed to within an inch of their lives. Be careful with any purchase for that reason. Cheap, fast cars are usually going to wind up with unsympathetic owners.

What information do you have to back up that claim that they're mostly thrashed to within an inch of their lives? Mostly they're bought by 30 or 40 somethings who are  reasonably well off people who are more likely to look after their cars, driven respectfully and serviced properly. As they come down in price they're still not bought by the Corsa brigade who couldn't afford the insurance premiums anyway.

I have to agree with MrCliodci. £50,000 cars tend to have big bills all the way through their lives. The first owner could afford the car, so can afford the bills, but when its a £10,000 second hand car its unlikely to be owned by someone who can afford to look after it properly. Thats not to say they are all badly maintained, but do be very careful

The Colonel's picture
Offline
Joined:
6 November 2007
Posts: 1997

mrcliodCi wrote:

That said, most are thrashed to within an inch of their lives. Be careful with any purchase for that reason. Cheap, fast cars are usually going to wind up with unsympathetic owners.

Utter nonsense.

artill wrote:

£50,000 cars tend to have big bills all the way through their lives.

Really not my experience.  Z4M, six years old, at most it's cost me £270 per year, on average, in servicing.  That is all.  iS, hasn't cost me anything, yet, and not likely to for a while...it still has two and a half years of warranty left for a start.

I'm sure Stig knows his way around, and knows well enough that, history is important and a 13 year old car is likely to need a bit more TLC than a 13 month old one.  Given his stated use, it is probably a fine choice.  My only reservation, and the reason why I'd seek out an E30 for what he says he is using it for, is that my view is the E30 is the better car.

If I knew what I was getting into, I wouldn't have done it...and I would have been wrong.

artill's picture
Offline
Joined:
19 December 2008
Posts: 2545

The Colonel wrote:

artill wrote:

£50,000 cars tend to have big bills all the way through their lives.

Really not my experience.  Z4M, six years old, at most it's cost me £270 per year, on average, in servicing.  That is all.  iS, hasn't cost me anything, yet, and not likely to for a while...it still has two and a half years of warranty left for a start.

You forgot depreciation! If you can afford to lose more than half the cost of an expensive car over its first 3 years, you can certainly pay for anything that may go wrong outside warrenty. If you are pushing yourself to buy the same car when its only worth £10k then any significant repair will end up with corners being cut.

And i wasnt saying the OP shouldnt buy the car, it looks very nice and if its as nice as it looks then i hope he does, just i think something like that needs a lot of thought, and a good eye, along with a bit of luck, not to end up with something that will try to ruin you.

Offline
Joined:
17 July 2009
Posts: 2583

Absolutely anycar can be 'thrashed to within an inch of it's life' and there's no evidence used BMW's are more likely to be thrashed than any other car. Of course you should look for a well looked after example with good SH but then that's just as much the case for a Astra as it is with a Beemer convertible.

Please register or login to post a comment.