witnessing a motorway accident

12 replies [Last post]
Offline
Joined:
5 February 2008
Posts: 57

Hi, it happened last Saturday. The experience still has me pondering about the best course of action in such an event: a three lane motorway somewhere in Belgium, moderate traffic travelling +- 120 km/h. Suddenly, some 200m away a car looses traction and dances across all the lanes while the ESP struggles to regain control. Finally it hits the left barrier and the car stops there, two wheels on the grass, two on the fast lane. I and two other cars pull to the right. We stop at the emergency lane, hazard lights on, try to see if the driver is OK. An old lady, as it turns out, seems fine. We call the police. Now, the following seconds make me sweat. She starts the motor and clearly intends to pull to the right emergency lane, where we stand. That means crossing three lanes from standstill, in a moderate traffic. The driver won't hear us from the distance so I run backwards trying to alert the incoming traffic. Most of them turn hazard lights on and slow down but - sure enough - one does not. He/she only reacts at the last second; centimetres and the electronic stability control prevent a major accident which would most likely involve all of us. My little daughter and pregnant wife were in the car as the sequence of events unfolded.

Now, I am not sure how this should have been handled properly. My guess is that after the accident, the driver should have stayed put where she was until police arrive. In the meantime, we could place warning triangles ahead of the spot. The fast lane isn't the safest place to get stuck, however, by moving the driver endangered herself and everyone around. By trying to help, I almost got pulled in.

How would you react under similar circumstances? I'd really like to know. Next time I'd be more reluctant to stop I'm afraid...

The Colonel's picture
Offline
Joined:
6 November 2007
Posts: 1997

sewa wrote:

Next time I'd be more reluctant to stop I'm afraid...

I'd always stop for an accident that I directly witnessed, even if it meant that I had to go on some distance to make sure that I can do so safely.

People can be as unpredictable as the ills that befall them and unfortunately having had an accident, shock or, more likely, bewilderment, can lead one to do what seems, to onlookers, irrational things.

In an ideal world, if there is no injury to persons, it would be best to get the car out of the carriageway and onto the hard shoulder as soon as possible, but only if it is safe to do so.  I don't know about Belgium, but in the UK and France it is usually not too long a wait for the police or Highways Agency patrol (or autoroute equivalent) to turn up.

To compound matters, there will always be one driver on the road that is oblivious to that which is going on around them - slowing traffic, hazard lights - and be anchoring up at the last moment, and they will do so if the car is in lane 3 or on the hard shoulder.

If I knew what I was getting into, I wouldn't have done it...and I would have been wrong.

Leslie Brook's picture
Offline
Joined:
26 October 2007
Posts: 1989

I was driving my elderly Mother home on the M25 recently, in the outside lane. Suddenly we heard a strange screeching noise, thinking a wheel bearing or or fan belt had gone I glanced in my mirror in case I needed to change lanes and saw the source of the noise. A car behind me was skidding at right angles to the direction of travel and drove head first from the inside lane into the central armco barrier.

I saw nothing of the run up to this, I had no involvement other than seeing the outcome, and to stop would just have added to the chaos. I drove on.

If I'd been on my own I may well have stopped, but it would have been more out of a morbid sense of curiosity rather than to contribute any useful information to the Police.

 

 R.I.P.     http://www.autocar.co.uk/forum

Offline
Joined:
1 June 2010
Posts: 1635

I sadly witnessed several motorway accidents over the years and all I can say is that it is very dangerous to stop. I am not saying that you have to go on because I think that trying to help is the istinctive and right reaction but you have to be very careful and lucid.

And every detail like the visibility of the road in that point, the amount of traffic, etc. have to be to taken into consideration. The zone remains very dangerous even minutes after the accident, especially if there isn't much traffic.

Once, years ago, a car next to me but far enough, loosing control and hitting the barrirer strong in a bend between two short tunnels on the Savona-Torino. It was very early, like 6 AM, not much traffic. I managed to imeediately stop in a safe place on the right, at least 200m before the accident. The family of 4 on the Volvo got out unhurted but the car was stuck in a dangerous place. In the mean time other cars stopped, a man placed a triangle well before the accident, SOS was called. The family, coming from Holland, seemed shocked but ok. The speed limit was 110kph in that stretch of motorway while after the first tunnel it descreased to 90kph for the bend, the cars at the speed seemed to have the time to see the three safely stopped cars on the right in the emgency pad, the triangle and then the Volvo stucked on the outer lane on the exit of the bend, the inner lane was free.

But suddenly a car came out from the first tunnel at an insane speed, the driver braked hard into the bend but he didn't managed to pass inside and slipped hitting the Volvo and taking off. Luckily the police arrived 1 minute after and no one was hit. I later discovered that the driver survived too. A situation that seemed under control for 10 minutes or so wasn't safe at all and no one seemed to realize it!

Peter Cavellini's picture
Offline
Joined:
29 October 2007
Posts: 5324

Who knows?.....there's a thousand answers,nobody want to be in an accident,the emergency services are the ones to deal with it not the driving public, the services are trained in dealing with accidents of all kinds, the public should not get involved, i assume they have traffic cameras just like ours, so,emergency services should turn up pronto, besides as you mention you stopped along with you and your family you put them in danger, if your forced to stop then, but, if not?,keep going, i know it's human nature to help,but in situations like that, drive on if you can.

Peter Cavellini.

Rich_uk's picture
Offline
Joined:
20 December 2008
Posts: 1361

Peter Cavellini wrote:

Who knows?.....there's a thousand answers,nobody want to be in an accident,the emergency services are the ones to deal with it not the driving public, the services are trained in dealing with accidents of all kinds, the public should not get involved, i assume they have traffic cameras just like ours, so,emergency services should turn up pronto, besides as you mention you stopped along with you and your family you put them in danger, if your forced to stop then, but, if not?,keep going, i know it's human nature to help,but in situations like that, drive on if you can.

I normally ignore your incomprehensible ramblings but...

'Drive on if you can' is a little different to 'only stop if it's safe'. Your lack of willingness to help other people indicates what sort of person you are.  

To the OP, I tip my hat to you for stopping. You did what was instinctive but it was also dangerous. The key aspect of the training for situations like this focuses on ensuring the scene is safe before anything else; easy ish for the police, not so easy for you. 

My advice to those intending to stop for motorway accidents is to stop much further down the road to the accident and call the police first and foremost. Try and get an eta, if it's in your nature to help you'll take less risks if you know the police are a couple of minutes away. I wouldn't recommend ever crossing any lanes whilst traffic is still moving. Most of all, keep your wits about you! Motorway accidents are considered dangerous for police to the point that only traffic officers will attend them and are given extra training as a result. 

The Autocar forum has gone so join some of us at thecarexpert.co.uk to continue the debate! 

Peter Cavellini's picture
Offline
Joined:
29 October 2007
Posts: 5324

Rich,uK@

Firstly,starting with an assumption, secondly, if your not involved in the accident and the emergency services are on the way and should arrive in 10 mins,why should you endanger yourself and family if someone behind isn't paying attention?,as to what kind of person i am has nothing to do with it, if all carriage ways are blocked then your involved, not to help ,but to see that your passengers,family are removed from danger,trying to be a hero isn't always the best thing to do,and as you should have gleaned from what i was saying, if there is room to progress, then you should do so,it not selfish, it's realising that there are servives far more able than you or me to deal with sudden explosions, fires,toxic fumes etc, you, me haven't the skills, no, i stand by my words....if you can move on...do so.As to one statement you made,you said."if it's in your nature to help you take less risks if you know the Police are a couple of mins away", just exactly is less risk?   

Peter Cavellini.

Los Angeles's picture
Offline
Joined:
17 July 2009
Posts: 4031

Peter Cavellini wrote:

just exactly [what] is less risk? 

Peter, Rich is giving wise and experienced advice. I didn't offer an opinion to the OP knowing Rich would, and accurately.

And it's true that your posts often omit key words knocking sense askew - please don't take offence. Like a crossword puzzle, I've gotten used to finding the missing words by using those on either side as clues - see my addition to yours above.

Smile

Offline
Joined:
2 July 2009
Posts: 1139

I stopped once here for a fatality some poor young bloke had had his head caved in and splattered all over the carriageway and the Police were just leaning against their car smoking . I covered the corpses head and shoulders over with my windscreen shade and gave the coppers a bollocking which they did not expect !

In hindsight I was taking a risk probably of being arrested and yes I would do it again as they were showing no respect for the dead . Might pass on giving out bollockings though . Yes I was traumatised for a while after but so would I have been if I just drove on and did nothing .

A big problem here is pedestrians trying to cross motorways and they cant run fast in tholbs . Next to no footbridges either . Crazy .

So things aint so bad in the UK .

Offline
Joined:
5 February 2008
Posts: 57

 

Thanks for feedback everyone. Stopping further down is certainly a good idea. Another lesson I learned is to have the warning triangle and a safety jacket handy. I had them in the trunk somewhere. We have two cars and I did not exactly remember where those items were in this one. From now on I'll keep the jacket next to the seat. it was a sobering experience...

 

Peter Cavellini's picture
Offline
Joined:
29 October 2007
Posts: 5324

Thats the idea, to make you think,expand on etc,too deep?.....no?

Peter Cavellini.

Please register or login to post a comment.