Venice: Hey, No Cars.

69 replies [Last post]
Offline
Joined:
15 June 2012
Posts: 451

Jacob F wrote:
Los Angeles wrote:

Stand by for Jacob Alphabet Soup's compulsive - aggressive response .... car topic ignored.

Hmm. Seems as if you like to bait people, Gareth W. why?

If you think he was trying to bait you, there's no need to rise to it. I don't think he was trying to bait you, but you've been known to take things personally under whatever name takes your fancy.

And as for using LA's name, you were told not to do that in a previous incarnation. Funny that this new user has a grudge against LA just like the last ones. And that the grudge clearly started from another site. And that the same information keeps being played back to us. And another thing hasn't changed. 'Noone' cares.

Offline
Joined:
15 June 2012
Posts: 195
Fidji5 wrote:

Jacob F wrote:
Los Angeles wrote:

Stand by for Jacob Alphabet Soup's compulsive - aggressive response .... car topic ignored.

Hmm. Seems as if you like to bait people, Gareth W. why?

If you think he was trying to bait you, there's no need to rise to it. I don't think he was trying to bait you, but you've been known to take things personally under whatever name takes your fancy.

And as for using LA's name, you were told not to do that in a previous incarnation. Funny that this new user has a grudge against LA just like the last ones. And that the grudge clearly started from another site. And that the same information keeps being played back to us. And another thing hasn't changed. 'Noone' cares.

Aw how sweet. He comes running to Gareth's rescue.

One other thing hasn't changed : someone who is permanently and irrevocably banned doesn't get to claim any moral high ground. In fact, you shouldn't be here.

So, mind your own business. Gareth W and I are managing just fine thanks. Isn't that right Gareth W?

Offline
Joined:
15 June 2012
Posts: 451

Jacob F wrote:

Gareth W and I are managing just fine thanks. Isn't that right Gareth W?

Did you acquire that information in the same way that your other personas did? Please answer this question, as I'm intriqued as to how you'll try to wriggle out of it.

Jacob F wrote:

In fact, you shouldn't be here.

LA was right. Irony is totally lost on you. In a sad kind of way, it's quite funny.

Offline
Joined:
15 June 2012
Posts: 195

It's because there's nothing ironic here that I don't see irony. You are banned. End of. I have nothing to wriggle out of, especially to someone who has no right to pass judgment. Weirdo.

Yawn.

Offline
Joined:
15 June 2012
Posts: 451

Jacob F wrote:

You are banned... Weirdo.

More irony...

Offline
Joined:
15 June 2012
Posts: 195
Fidji5 wrote:

Jacob F wrote:

You are banned... Weirdo.

More irony...

No! That's not irony, you dummy! That's the truth!

Offline
Joined:
15 June 2012
Posts: 451

Jacob F wrote:
Fidji5 wrote:

Jacob F wrote:

You are banned... Weirdo.

More irony...

No! That's not irony, you dummy! That's the truth!

'Dummy'. You used to use that word a lot in previous incarnations, didn't you?

Offline
Joined:
15 June 2012
Posts: 195
Fidji5 wrote:

Jacob F wrote:
Fidji5 wrote:

Jacob F wrote:

You are banned... Weirdo.

More irony...

No! That's not irony, you dummy! That's the truth!

'Dummy'. You used to use that word a lot in previous incarnations, didn't you?

Haha! Are you really centring some kind of allegation around the sole use of the word 'dummy'?!

You're not a barrister. Ooh, I should have added 'are you?' to that. But I didn't.

Gareth and Fidji sitting in a tree K-I-S-S-I-N-G.

Offline
Joined:
15 June 2012
Posts: 451

Yawn.

Please register or login to post a comment.