From £22,200
Updated Forester is more refined, but top-spec version is pricey

Our Verdict

Subaru Forester 2008-2013
Subaru’s 4x4 estate morphs into bona fide small SUV

The Subaru Forester avoids the glam detailing of most other soft-roaders and sticks to traditional 4x4 spec

4 September 2011

What is it?

An updated version of the third-generation Subaru Forester, with a new 2.0-litre diesel engine at its heart. Subaru makes bold claims for it’s new powerplant, which is linked to a six-speed manual gearbox. Officially it returns 7.2 per cent better fuel economy (up to an official 47.9mpg), lower emissions (155g/km), increased torque (258lb ft, accessible from 600 to 2400rpm, 200rpm lower than before) and improved refinement.

Improvements are put down to the adoption of a new common-rail fuel-injection system, a more efficient turbo-charging system, new camshaft timing, an improved cooling system, the use of lighter connecting rods and the use of a smaller alternator.

Other changes are minor to the point of being of little relevance, but for the eagle-eyed there’s a new chrome finish on the grille, more compact wing mirrors, a new instrument binnacle and a new design of steering wheel.

The model we’re testing here is the top-of-the-range 2.0D XS NavPlus, which starts at a hearty £29,070. More on that later, but that price does buy a car laden with kit, including sat-nav, reversing camera, CD player, leather seats, an electric driver’s seat and keyless entry.

What’s it like?

On our first run in the UK in the car, the engine proved smooth, reasonably relaxed and delivered decent acceleration through the gears – although the spacing spreads out from third onwards. That means you have to rev hard to get beyond town speeds, and can find yourself changing down to join a motorway or overtake. A 0-62mph time of 10.3sec isn’t going to set anyone’s pants on fire, but nor does it feel slow in a car of this size.

It delivers on the refinement promise, too, the boxer engine never raising beyond a gentle burble that’s appealing in its own right so long as you keep the revs below 3000rpm. With the decent six-speed gearbox, that’s fairly easy to do even while pushing on along the motorway. Road noise is more of an issue, although it doesn’t intrude enough to make conversation hard. Wind noise is extremely minor.

Beyond that, the Forester is much the same as before. The steering remains a touch vague, offering very little feel, and the soft suspension means there’s plenty of lean and roll in the corners while offering the compensation of soaking up the harshest bumps.

The interior may be improved a fraction, but leather aside it remains home to a plethora of hard plastic and functional but uninspiring controls. Still, it’s practical and hard-wearing and, even if the controls aren’t intuitive to learn, there’s few enough of them that you soon get there.

Should I buy one?

If you’re looking for a decent-sized, reasonably rugged car then it could justifiably be on your shortlist. However, you’d have to think long and hard about buying it in this spec – a similarly specced Hyundai ix35 would come in around £5000 cheaper and you’re only around 15 per cent off the price of an equivalent Land Rover Freelander TD4.

If you’re determined to buy one, then, haggle hard, and ask yourself how much you really need the leather seats, sat-nav and other accoutrements because lower spec models definitely look better value.

Subaru Forester 2.0D XS NavPlus

Price: £29,070; Top speed 116mph; 0-62mph 10.3sec; Economy 47.9mpg; CO2 158g/km; Kerb weight 1540kg; Engine type 1998cc, diesel; Power 145bhp at 3600rpm; Torque 258lb ft at 1600rpm; Gearbox 6-spd manual

Join the debate

Comments
12

6 September 2011

Wish they'd change that dashboard.....horrible!

Anonymous

6 September 2011

[quote 5cylinder]

Wish they'd change that dashboard.....horrible!

[/quote] I agree. That interior is horrible!

6 September 2011

Subaru lost me with this 3rd revision Forester and it doesn't look like its improving on what matters. It's too high, too soft, lacking in the feel my second gen car has etc. etc. Fortunately we're just going onto our 9th year of ownership of that car (2.0XT) and still it hasn't needed anything but regular service items. On the local gravel roads through the woods it's an absolute hoot.

6 September 2011

[quote chandrew]Subaru lost me with this 3rd revision Forester and it doesn't look like its improving on what matters. It's too high, too soft, lacking in the feel my second gen car has etc. etc. Fortunately we're just going onto our 9th year of ownership of that car (2.0XT) and still it hasn't needed anything but regular service items. On the local gravel roads through the woods it's an absolute hoot.[/quote]

+1 for the losing bit.

The last Forester was the ultimate Wolf in Sheeps clothing and frequently topped the reliability tables.

The Legacy too has gone the same way....

Back to FWD Sad

6 September 2011

All I can say is bring back the flat four turbo petrol. Without it, this car has gone from a class leader to a nothing. In fact, Subaru, redo the whole of your range, like it was in the 90s. An Impreza saloon in WR Blue Mica with gold alloys, pink STI bages everywhere and a gigantic rear wing. And, while you're at it, make a 4WD Justy and make the Legacy good again. Phew. Glad I got that off my chest.

6 September 2011

[quote Fidji]All I can say is bring back the flat four turbo petrol. Without it, this car has gone from a class leader to a nothing. In fact, Subaru, redo the whole of your range, like it was in the 90s. An Impreza saloon in WR Blue Mica with gold alloys, pink STI bages everywhere and a gigantic rear wing. And, while you're at it, make a 4WD Justy and make the Legacy good again. Phew. Glad I got that off my chest.[/quote]

Lol! + 1! Does anyone else find the idea of a 1600 Justy WRC Car and equivalent STi road car positively drool inducing?

8 September 2011

I'm really not sure who this car is aimed at? Farmers, certainly but other than that I just don't know.

It certainly has it's qualities, reliability being one but there are too many other cars on the market that do the same job for less money.

Drop the price by £5000 so that it can compete properly with the afore mentioned IX35 and they may be getting some where.

 

 

It's all about the twisties........

8 September 2011

258ft/lbs at 600 rpm thats amazing, what does it idle at......

9 September 2011

[quote Fidji]

All I can say is bring back the flat four turbo petrol. Without it, this car has gone from a class leader to a nothing. In fact, Subaru, redo the whole of your range, like it was in the 90s. An Impreza saloon in WR Blue Mica with gold alloys, pink STI bages everywhere and a gigantic rear wing. And, while you're at it, make a 4WD Justy and make the Legacy good again. Phew. Glad I got that off my chest.

[/quote]

+1 on the Legacy but with the flat 6 and manual gearbox or a proper modern torque converter automatic, non of this CVT garbage.

9 September 2011

It sure is expensive, but very low running costs for a Forester.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka
  •  Maserati Ghibli Diesel
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    Maserati releases another range of updates for its range best seller, the Ghibli. We've driven the diesel version, but there's little improvement on before
  • Tipo Front
    First Drive
    21 September 2016
    New Fiat Tipo offers impressive space and practicality for a reasonable price. We try the 1.6 diesel on the demanding roads of North Wales
  • Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150
    First Drive
    20 September 2016
    The Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150 makes perfect sense: it's spacious, tidy to drive for an SUV and cheap to run