Fast, fun and spectacular, but not something to take seriously. But when Nissan says the other option to achieve the aim of seeing the words ‘Juke’ and ‘performance’ in a TV advert, it’s nice to see the slightly crazy option win out for a change.

Our Verdict

Nissan Juke-R

Race experts turn up the GT-R V6's wick to 591bhp to create an even madder Juke than before

  • First Drive

    Nissan Juke R

    Fast, fun and spectacular, but not something to take seriously.
18 January 2012

What is it?

What do you do if you have in production an eccentric-looking, popular crossover, and a genre redefining supercar, plus a desire to re-pitch the aforementioned crossover as an unlikely-sounding new type of performance car? The solution is a pragmatic one: you simply combine the two, in the process creating a mutant, 485bhp four-wheel drive urban tearaway with which to terrorise any unsuspecting exotica that falls into its sinister orbit.

There’s already a turbocharged, all-wheel drive Juke, of course – the 188bhp DIG-T with torque vectoring four-wheel drive – and Nissan showed a Juke Nismo concept at the Tokyo show, and that’s about all you need to know to understand the reasons behind the Juke R existence. It won’t be available from your local Nissan dealer any time soon, though, rather its task is to fill pages such as these, and monopolise web content – all so the public at large see the Juke in a new and suitably sporty light.

What's it like?

Whatever you feel about that marketing spin, the car itself is definitely worthy of attention. Although supported by both NTCE (Nissan’s European technical centre at Cranfield) and NDE (Nissan’s design centre in central London), the car was actually designed and built by hugely experienced race and engineering firm Ray Mallock Ltd (RML), perhaps best known for building the all-conquering BTCC Primeras during the height of the Super-Touring era in the late 1990s.

From go-ahead to completion RML had just 22 fraught weeks to bring Juke R into production. Rather than unnecessarily litter the workshop floor with bits of scrap Juke only to find the GT-R’s guts wouldn’t fit, the team checked CAD models first to see if the task was feasible.

Satisfied that the two cars could be morphed into one, the next concern was just what the GTR’s sophisticated running gear would make of being squashed inside the body of the upright, smaller Juke. In effect, would the complex brain of the GT-R’s chassis systems reject the transplant?

To find out, the next step was a drastic one – and one that can’t fail to make you wince. A GT-R was cut into two pieces, and refashioned with a 250mm shorter wheelbase and shorter propshaft, before being taken to the MIRA proving ground. Much to the team’s surprise – and delight – the GTR running gear took into account the new parameters and drove well. The game was on.

There followed a delivery of complete cars to RML’s base in Wellingborough: two brand new Jukes ready for the cutter, and one new and one slightly used GT-R, also for the chop. A Juke was put in the RML workshop and braced from the outside with a steel cage, necessary because the team than cut out the entire floor area and the internal bulkheads, thereby robbing the shell of its integrity. Without the bracing, it would wobble like a blancmange.

Nissan’s full test program, as overseen by NTCE, is as arduous and exhaustive as the next manufacturer’s, so once the components had been fitted in their cramp confines the Juke R was put through a condensed, but still thorough, version of that test. This, you might have gathered, isn’t some styling studio lash-up.

There’s a roll cage to climb over, and a competition OMP bucket seat to drop down into, but once you’re actually inside the Juke R there’s plenty of the crossover left to make the performance that follows a mind-scrambling act. With the Juke centre stack and binnacle still present, plus the upright screen and high roofline, you’re clearly not sitting in a GT-R. And yet the mass of driver information in front of you, the gauges, dials and numbers blinking for your attention, the rumble of the twin-turbo 3.8-litre V6 that permeates the bodyshell and seat, and not least the 65/75mm wider front/rear track and GT-R wheel and brakes combo that sets out the Juke R’s stall like the Klitschko brothers’ rippling their muscles at a weigh-in all suggest something massively more potent than a Juke.

Moving off is simple in the Juke-R: put your foot on the brake and drag the short gear selection lever down into ‘A’ – or ‘M’ if you’re intending to shift cogs yourself. Opt for the latter, and you have the GT-R’s, standard-setting twin clutch ’box at your fingertips via paddles positioned behind the steering wheel.

Plant the throttle and the acceleration is immediately of the visceral, head-thrown-back variety, and it’s made all the more weird by the feeling of being in this little crossover. It’s as if you’re subconscious is telling you one thing, picking up on the speed and the fact you know it’s a GT-R underneath, while your brain says, “It’s just a Nissan Juke”.

Shortening the wheelbase and altering the weight balance compared to the GT-R has naturally altered how the chassis responds. In one sense it feels more nimble, pivoting somewhere below your seat and snapping onto your chosen line through a corner, but from that point you need to be careful. The weight of the Juke-R starts to tell – at 1806kg this is no lightweight – and the understeer builds if you’re not patient with the throttle. Juke-R development chief Michael Mallock admits the car has been set up with this layer of understeer for on-road safety, and once at the exit of a corner there’s no denying the formidable traction on offer or the accelerative punch. The brakes too, are exemplary – particularly given the speed, heat and mass puzzle they’re trying to solve.

Should I buy one?

In reality the Juke-R is a piece of marketing tinsel. Fast, fun and spectacular, true, but on its own not something to take very seriously. But when Nissan says the other option to achieve the aim of seeing the words ‘Juke’ and ‘performance’ intertwined was a modish TV advert, it’s nice to see the oily, noisy, slightly crazy option win out for a change.

Adam Towler

Price: na; Top speed: 160mph; 0-62mph: 3.7sec; Economy: na; Co2: na; Kerbweight: 1806kg; Engine type: 4 cylinder, V6, 3799cc, twin-turbo, petrol; Power: 485bhp at 6400rpm; Torque: 434lb ft at 3200rpm; Gearbox: 6-spd dual clutch

Join the debate

Comments
27

18 January 2012

Sorry but this is either cynical or pointless marketing BS.

At least the Ford Transit hiding a XJ220 made me laugh. This just makes me wince.

18 January 2012

I suppose if I drove a Nissan Joke i'd want to be going so fast no one could see me.

18 January 2012

I think it looks better than the shopping model its based on, but probably not hard to do.

My first impression when I saw the pic was that it reminded me of the bonkers rally metro.

Both to me symbolise someone creating a car that was fairly woeful to start with into something that was concieved whilst whole heartedly inhaling.

I wonder when the shopping model comes down in price on the secondhand market will we see the Saxo brigade swap over to these.

18 January 2012

I dont understand the bile this car seems to generate, yes its a marketing excercise but at least its a bit of a silly one! rather than a bland TV or Poster ad, as the review says.

i personally think its a great little car, reminds me of the X5 LM and the Espace F1, they are just stupid toys that will end up in a museum. but i dont see how the world is in anyway worse of for their creation.

Well done to Nissan for having a bit of a laugh and raising a smile, in these days of penny pinching accountants i think thats quite important.

18 January 2012

The Nissan Puke, oops i mean Juke is by far the ugliest thing on the roads today.....

18 January 2012

[quote Vidge 123]Well done to Nissan for having a bit of a laugh and raising a smile, in these days of penny pinching accountants i think thats quite important.[/quote] Why is it when finance is being cut for whatever reason it's the fault of penny pinching accountants, whereas when money is being spent accountants don't get a mention. The fact is 'business' is run by accountants.

18 January 2012

Bonkers mental and I love it. Well done for constructing this Nissan.

18 January 2012

[quote Purplepea][quote Vidge 123]Well done to Nissan for having a bit of a laugh and raising a smile, in these days of penny pinching accountants i think thats quite important.[/quote] Why is it when finance is being cut for whatever reason it's the fault of penny pinching accountants, whereas when money is being spent accountants don't get a mention. The fact is 'business' is run by accountants.[/quote]

guessing your an accountant then..... lifes a bitch deal with it, i work in sales for an engineering firm supplying pretty complex CHP systems, and if i get sales i am under fire for what i have sold even if its completely correct, and if i dont get sales then i am underfire for that to, for obvious reasons.

18 January 2012

[quote Vidge 123]

Well done to Nissan for having a bit of a laugh and raising a smile, in these days of penny pinching accountants i think thats quite important.

[/quote]

Totally agree. A Juke with a GT-R engine, if that's not a mad idea then what is? We need more of manufacturers doing silly things, even if it's just for PR reasons.

18 January 2012

[quote Autocar]

What is it?


What do you do if you have in production an eccentric-looking, popular crossover, and a genre redefining supercar, plus a desire to re-pitch the aforementioned crossover as an unlikely-sounding new type of performance car? The solution is a pragmatic one: you simply combine the two, in the process creating a mutant, 485bhp four-wheel drive urban tearaway with which to terrorise any unsuspecting exotica that falls into its sinister orbit.



There’s already a turb...Read the full article

[/quote] Come on!...........what should it be tested against ?

Peter Cavellini.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka
  •  Maserati Ghibli Diesel
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    Maserati releases another range of updates for its range best seller, the Ghibli. We've driven the diesel version, but there's little improvement on before
  • Tipo Front
    First Drive
    21 September 2016
    New Fiat Tipo offers impressive space and practicality for a reasonable price. We try the 1.6 diesel on the demanding roads of North Wales
  • Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150
    First Drive
    20 September 2016
    The Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150 makes perfect sense: it's spacious, tidy to drive for an SUV and cheap to run