From £70,895
Still invigoratingly bonkers, but now a bit more accessible and involving at normal speeds

Our Verdict

Nissan GT-R
The super-coupé bargain of the decade

The Nissan GT-R is not a cheap car, but it’s better value for money than cars that are seemingly as fast

  • First Drive

    2017 Nissan GT-R Prestige review

    Nissan’s performance poster-boy grows old with surprising grace but is falling behind the pace of the super-sports elite
  • First Drive

    2014 Nissan GT-R first drive review

    Subtle changes make standard GT-R more appealing to drive, but by creating the GT-R Nismo, Nissan has left us with the job of choosing between the two...

What is it?

The Nissan GT-R hardly feels old tech these days; it was only launched three years ago and it is still considered a benchmark for engineering and value. But it wasn’t without fault and so this is the Japanese maker’s answer to the critics.

Power is up to 523bhp, torque is up to 451lb ft through a wider rev range, a carbonfibre strut brace now straddles the engine bay, the tyres get new compounds, there are some new seats and some subtle revisions to the styling inside and out and the price is £10k higher.

See test pics of the Nissan GT-R MY11 in action

What’s it like?

This is the first time we’ve driven the new 2011 car in the UK, where the extra 44bhp and 18lb ft may seem irrelevant considering the already brutal performance the GT-R offers, but there are some noticeable differences. More than the extra power it’s the 451lb ft of torque, which now stretches from 3200rpm to 6000rpm instead of 5200rpm, that is the most useful element. It makes the GT-R’s performance a little more accessible, a little more of the time.

An altered ‘comfort’ mode for the suspension brings more pliancy at speed – particularly for motorway driving – but don’t expect a wafty experience at any point. On a typical B-road the Nissan suffers from some noisy and severe crashing and rebounding, though this always feels a justifiable compromise given the GT-R’s nature even if some rivals offer a better-resolved ride for UK surfaces.

If there is any upgrade here that is truly useful in the UK it is the extra pointiness and more involving handling at low speeds that the improved rigidity has brought. It is still an endearingly blunt car in some respects, particularly the brutal power delivery, but adding a touch more immediacy at normal road speeds is something that will be welcomed by any enthusiast.

Adding a touch of finesse to the GT-R may be the equivalent of making a suede-coated knuckle-duster, but the changes only enhance what made it extraordinary in the first place. It is still monstrously and brilliantly unsubtle, and it still feels entirely a product of the electronic age. We wouldn’t want it any other way.

Should I buy one?

The only unwelcome element of the new car is its price hike. In 2010 Nissan will charge £59,645 for the base GT-R, but when this new model arrives in 2011 it will ask £69,950. Some may query whether there is five-figures worth of upgrades but given that the price includes a VAT increase, improved specification and a hefty power upgrade it’s easy to see why Nissan thinks it’s worth it.

To put it in perspective, anything offering similar performance is well into six figures, so it still looks like rude good value by comparison. Should you buy one? Ideally we should all buy two.

Nissan GT-R 3.8 V6 MY11

Price: £69,950; Top speed: 196mph (est); 0-62mph: 3.5sec (est); Economy: 23.5mpg; CO2: 279g/km; Kerb weight: 1750kg (est); Engine type: V6, 3799cc, twin-turbo, petrol; Power: 523bhp at 6400rpm; Torque: 451lb ft at 3200-6000rpm; Gearbox: 6-speed dual clutch auto

See all the latest Nissan GT-R reviews, news and video

Join the debate

Comments
9

28 October 2010

Mine's already muchtoofastenough .......

28 October 2010

As far as I know Nissan lost money on the original version, and I suppose this price hike only reduces the losses. Perhaps in 10 years the brand GT-R will be valuable enough to be sold with a healthy margin, if not at 911 levels.

28 October 2010

Optimal-909, are you saying it's to good for us average earner's?, for the money it's bettervalue than 911, but it hasn't got the heritage, has it?, does it need it?,no what we need are car's with performance that's accessible to most of us money and skill-wise.

Peter Cavellini.

28 October 2010

I wouldn't go so far to call the GT-R an average earner's car. Good performance for the money, but since I would own such a car to enjoy it and not to win street races. So for me a Mustang is a lot more for lot less money. On the other hand I like the original R34 GT-R, or the 911 but not this ugly thing.

28 October 2010

Yes, true, but beauty nowadays is being replaced by function rather than being pleasing on the eye because to obtain more grip, balance etc, technology is to a certain extent what is needed, don't you think?, afterall most of the hypercars aren't exactly catwalk material, maybe "ugly" should be replaced with agressively gorgeous?.

Peter Cavellini.

29 October 2010

Ryan,

You are absolutely right.

None of the Japanese companies make any money in Europe and it has never been a significant source of their profits. Japan has also stopped being a big profit centre. The real money comes from the US and now China; 40% currently comes from the latter.

Selling a few hundred GT-Rs makes absolutely no difference, which is great and means we get an amazing halo car at a great price.

Wouldn't it be nice if other big makers with Nissan's resources did the same? I know VW have gifted us the Phaeton, but a VW GT-R would be nice (what happened to the W12 supercar?)? Or a Fiat GT-R (actually there was the Alfa 8C but too expensive), a Honda GT-R (can you really see the new NSX being priced at £70K?), a Ford GT-R (I guess the Focus RS went some of the way...) or a Peugeot or Renault GT-R... Imagine what the RenaultSport team could do - they could call it an 'Alpine GTA' or something...

Hey-ho, back to work.

29 October 2010

I expect that the performance hikes are to ensure that it can still keep the battle for fastest around the 'ring with Porsche in the motoring press and they have decided that they can afford the large price hike to try to stem the losses on each car.

30 October 2010

Why after such a short period on the market are they up to Version/Mark 14 or whatever already? Hideous car. Now go away and buy something decent

25 December 2010

And nothing about the most disappointing aspect of the original - the weight?

More power to an already blunt instrument makes it a BFH perhaps?

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2016 Audi A3 Sportback e-tron UK review
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    First UK drive finds the facelifted A3 Sportback e-tron remains a first-rate plug-in hybrid that is packed with tech if a little short on driver appeal
  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka