From £14,444
Limited-edition MG features many revisions - at a cost

Our Verdict

MG TF
The MG TF was the model that marked the brand's comeback

The MG TF is undeniably flawed, but it is an appealing driver’s car nonetheless

16 October 2009

What is it?

This is the second limited-edition version of the reborn MG TF from SAIC-owned Nanjing’s MG Motor; the first was the TFLE500 that marked the rebirth of this ageing sports car and the resumption of car production at Longbridge.

The 85th anniversary being celebrated is of the MG marque itself, which continues to survive despite the traumas experienced by its multiple former owners and periods of dormancy.

A quick glance at this new TF, complete with fashionable stripes, assorted decals and new alloys is likely to have you concluding that this is yet another cynical limited-edition dress-up, but in fact, there’s a little more to this 50-model run.

What you get besides the stripes is a chassis that’s been revised to a surprising extent, this the key surviving element of a now-abandoned TF makeover that would have seen it receiving all-new skin panels, a new interior and very probably a relaunch as a new car.

Sadly this programme was killed by the recession (the only MG Motor project that Chinese owner SAIC has canned as a result of the downturn - but there are others under way) and the view that it would not have been possible to price this revised car high enough to recover the development costs. That’s a pity, because the TF still has strengths.

But what we are seeing are quite extensive chassis changes, which start with a switch to rear wheels that are an inch wider than the front pair, the first time the TF has run in this configuration.

The 215/40 16 rear rubber compares with 195/45 16 tyres up front, and combines with roll stiffness that has been increased by 40 per cent with the aim of improving the TF’s (already good) on-the-limit progression. Reducing roll better controls a quirk of the MG’s suspension geometry, its roll-centre migrating more than is desirable when body-roll builds up. So when it gets to the limit, says senior engineer Ian Pogson, ‘It strokes your cheek rather than slapping it."

Thicker Eibach anti-roll bars and upgraded Bilstein dampers generate the extra roll resistance. There are no changes to the TF’s electric power steering, but the chassis alterations are claimed to improve feel, while SAIC’s Longbridge engineers reckon that the TF’s supple ride has largely been preserved.

What’s it like?

Better and worse, in truth. The MG’s primary ride over big bumps is tighter and more fluently controlled and its responses are a little sharper, but its previously above-average ability to soak up sharp shocks has been compromised.

So over the typical British B-road, where it has always excelled, there’s now some patter and crash over small bumps, and a bit of kickback through the steering wheel that wasn’t there before. These disturbances aren’t uncomfortable, but they do damage its refinement.

On the positive side, this TF is a sharper weapon in fast-charged bends, and on a track it's likely to be more responsive, more progressive, better controlled and more fun. The steering responds more consistently too, although turn-in could still be sharper.

In other respects this is the TF that we know so well, with its odd and (for the tall) cramped driving position, low-rent furnishings, and lack of sophistication. That said, the feeling that you are conducting a machine, rather than a highly insulated transportation device, is part of its appeal, and a key reason why it provides surprising entertainment, especially given its grippy, capable handling, and willing engine.

Should I buy one?

Hi-res pictures of the MG TF 85th Anniversary edition

Sadly, it’s too easy to dismiss this 14-year-old car for its age and faults, especially at a price some £2000 more than you’d pay for the just-as-fast TF 135 and only £700 less than the cheapest MX-5.

Apart from the sharper chassis you do get the special paint, stripes, stickers and alloys (which modernise it quite effectively) air conditioning, a passenger airbag, leather trim and the rarity of having one of 50 cars, but those extras take the TF too close to the chill winds of modern competition.

For MG fans it will appeal, but at this price it’s very hard to make a robust case for it. Still, MG will be offering the revised chassis in a new model next March, when TF production resumes. Hopefully, that will be more keenly priced.

Join the debate

Comments
11

19 October 2009

Sounds like the suspension engineers know a bit more than Audi's, who worked on the A5.

19 October 2009

I really want to like this car. I must say i think they got it wrong to launch it with all the bits on. the basic car at £13,500 is quite good value, and i understand decent discounts are available. So it cant really be compared to the MX5 as its much cheaper. It does drive well, but also looks old.

Hopefully the market will pick up as the economy improves, and when production re starts next march, lets hope there will be buyers out there.

We need more, simple, fun cars, and so this deserves to survive

19 October 2009

it maybe good value but would you not rather have a second hand z4 or even mx-5 etc? i know i would its about time this car was put to sleep

19 October 2009

[quote VX220EDDIE] its about time this car was put to sleep
[/quote]

At least a proper modern re-skin and a fresh interior. I would love a mid engined roadster for £13-15K. I love MGs but I have my limits and buying a car that is one facelift away from a car that's been around since 1996 it way past that limit.

19 October 2009

We would all like this car to succeed

But lets get real and not just about the age of the car - does anyone actually know where to buy one? - unless you live next door to a dealership?

They need to get their act together or they will quickly go the way of the company that sadly finished in 2005

20 October 2009

Sorry - this is a complete embarassment.

20 October 2009

Are we sure this isn't just to mark the 85th anniversary of the MG TF?

20 October 2009

The main arguements against the car seems to be that its got an old face. Not that there is much wrong the design but simply it is more than four years old.

The fact that the report suggests that the original design was pretty good and that it has been successfully been given a handling update is largely overlooked.

Could this be why many aspects of car development have stagnated with only fresh bodywork and "perceived quality" evolving. Weight, performance, handling, ride are all getting worse on many mainstream models but this does not appear to worry the average buyer as long as there is a new shape on the drive and it is slightly quiter to sit in than the previous model.

20 October 2009

[quote jerry99]

The main arguements against the car seems to be that its got an old face. Not that there is much wrong the design but simply it is more than four years old.

The fact that the report suggests that the original design was pretty good and that it has been successfully been given a handling update is largely overlooked.

Could this be why many aspects of car development have stagnated with only fresh bodywork and "perceived quality" evolving. Weight, performance, handling, ride are all getting worse on many mainstream models but this does not appear to worry the average buyer as long as there is a new shape on the drive and it is slightly quiter to sit in than the previous model.

[/quote]You may well have a point. First manufacturer to come up with a cheap and cheerful, good looking RWD roadster with a 1.2 or 1.4 turbocharged engine developing 110-120BHP, weighing about 900KG, 0-60 around 9secs top speed irrelevant (as I very rarely exceed 85 these days) 45mpg-50mpg, all for around £12K-£14K and called an MG Midget will have me breaking down the showroom door to buy one.

30 October 2009

I am so very surprised in this day and age of very capable manufacturers of exceptionally high quality add on or replacement body panels that no one has come up with a good one for the MG.

The engine seems to be OK, the suspension seems to be OK but it is just that ape-taped body and other aspects of it's appearance that is dragging it down.

Loving life in France with my Springers

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka
  •  Maserati Ghibli Diesel
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    Maserati releases another range of updates for its range best seller, the Ghibli. We've driven the diesel version, but there's little improvement on before
  • Tipo Front
    First Drive
    21 September 2016
    New Fiat Tipo offers impressive space and practicality for a reasonable price. We try the 1.6 diesel on the demanding roads of North Wales
  • Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150
    First Drive
    20 September 2016
    The Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150 makes perfect sense: it's spacious, tidy to drive for an SUV and cheap to run