Matt Saunders
15 August 2012

What is it?

The Mercedes-Benz ML63 AMG, which we’ve just sampled in the UK for the first time. It isn’t actually the ultimate Mercedes M-class – not measured by function alone, at least. It’s not available with the locking differentials, underbody protection and clever traction control of Merc’s On & Offroad package; on a braked trailer, it won’t even tow as much as an ML350 Bluetec. It will, however, accelerate to 62mph in less than five seconds – every bit as quickly as a Porsche Cayenne Turbo or a BMW X5 M, and quite a lot more so than a Range Rover Sport Supercharged.

If you like generous helpings, you’ll like what you find here. AMG’s twin-turbocharged 5.5-litre V8 engine has more cubic capacity than any other performance SUV. And while its standard 518bhp and 516lb ft of torque aren’t outstanding outputs amongst some very powerful rivals, if you spend £6165 on Merc’s optional Performance Pack, you can endow your ML with 549bhp and 561lb ft - which are unsurpassed in the class.

What is it like?

Brisk. Our test car didn’t have the uprated engine - unless you’re shopping specifically for the very gutsiest 4x4 on the market, you don’t need it. For any 2.2-tonne luxury family car, the ML63 is seriously fast - particularly through the everyday meat of the rev range. Peak torque is available from below 2000rpm, and so powering along motorway slip roads and accruing overtaking speeds are tasks this luxury five-seater takes to with spectacular relish.

Urgent progress can be affected initially by hesitancy from the seven-speed torque converter automatic gearbox, but manual mode allows you to get sharper responses from the powertrain. Having selected that, you need to be careful not to allow the engine to run into its rev limiter on full throttle surges, which intervenes abruptly at a fairly modest threshold just beyond 6000rpm. Learn the motor’s quirks, however, and you can cover ground as quickly as you would in almost any smaller fast car, enjoying excellent forward visibility, plenty of grip and very impressive body control.

If there was as much involvement as performance and composure, the ML63 would be outstanding. AMG’s dynamic brief here was clearly to temper entertainment value with even greater refinement and ease-of-use than would usually characterise its cars. And so, for all its potency and purchase, there isn’t much to hook you into the act of driving the ML63 hard - aside from its speed and V8 exhaust woofle. The steering’s light and fairly remote: accurate and easy to get on with, but a little bit uninspiring. The handling’s very tidy and precise, but the damping of the car’s air suspension lacks suppleness and dexterity over uneven surfaces, and sometimes fails to engender a strong sense of connection with the road.

Should I buy one?

Depends where your priorities lie. This car has probably ended up exactly where Mercedes wanted it to be: it’s refined, fast, luxurious, well-equipped and obviously more practical than both a Cayenne and an X5. 

The trade off is that, while it would be a fabulous car to live with, the ML isn’t the supreme fast SUV to actually drive. You could certainly spend your £80k on something a little more exciting in its handling. But if you want to spend it on a car to use every day, as variously as big family 4x4s tend to be used, and that’ll still feel pretty special when you do stretch its legs, you’ll struggle to improve on the ML63’s overall showing.

Mercedes ML63 AMG

Price £82,995; 0-62mph 4.8sec; Top speed 155mph (limited); Economy 23.9mpg; CO2 276g/km; Kerbweight 2345kg; Engine type, cc V8, 5461cc, twin turbocharged petrol; Power 518bhp at 5250-5750rpm; Torque 516lb ft at 1750-5500rpm; Gearbox 7-spd auto

Join the debate

Comments
14

Buy 2 - Instead of a Top spec Range Rover

43 weeks 5 days ago

The Range Rover is an overpriced, unreliable, anachronism.

No more aerodynamic than a brick.

Consider that you can buy an ML 6.3 for towing the boat & a G Class G350 CDi Bluetec for serious rough stuff & you have only spent a little more than the Range Rover.

Come on Land Rover / Britain, you can do better.

I grew up driving Land Rovers (5 of them) from age 10, over 50 yrs ago, if Health & Safety wish to follow up.

 

Malo Mori Quam Foedari

The styling is still a bit

43 weeks 4 days ago

The styling is still a bit naff to say the least, the rear end looks like it had the extra space applied as an afterthought, similar to the original 5 door (estate) Imprezza. 

I dont get cars like these

43 weeks 4 days ago

"But if you want to spend it on a car to use every day, as variously as big family 4x4s tend to be used, and that’ll still feel pretty special when you do stretch its legs, you’ll struggle to improve on the ML63’s overall showing".

Really? E63 estate? M5 touring?  535 Msport touring and many thousands left in the bank. Superb 3.6 4x4 estate with even more thousands left in the bank. Im missing the point though. Those cars dont ram your wealth and self importance home to others like this 2.2 tonne lump of pointlessness.

 

Oh Noes

43 weeks 4 days ago

Citytiger wrote:

The styling is still a bit naff to say the least, the rear end looks like it had the extra space applied as an afterthought, similar to the original 5 door (estate) Imprezza. 

I looked, looked away, rubbed my eyes and looked again... And there it was: Picture No. 4 - It's a flippin SsangYong Rodius

*Shudder*

Take no notice... I'm only here for the biscuits

Lovely cars these 2 ton v8

43 weeks 4 days ago

Lovely cars these 2 ton v8 behemoths. Great for the environment.

www.KOOOLcr.com

[quote]5.5-litre V8 engine

43 weeks 4 days ago

Quote:

5.5-litre V8 engine has more cubic capacity than any other performance SUV

 

Really... Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 would beg to differ. As would the Audi Q7 V12.

"obviously more practical than both a Cayenne and an X5"

42 weeks 4 days ago

Does anyone know what this means, should I change my Cayenne for an ML to be more "practical"? 

Very interesting blog. Alot

24 weeks 1 day ago

Very interesting blog. Alot of blogs I see these days don't really provide anything that I'm interested in, but I'm most definately interested in this one. Just thought that I would post and let you know.   visiter notre site

IDEAS PRACTICALLY

20 weeks 5 days ago

i like to see it lap the milesROOM EXPANDING

IDEAS PRACTICALLY

20 weeks 5 days ago

i like to see it lap the milesIDEAS PRACTICALLY

Please register or login to post a comment.

Our Verdict

The Mercedes M-class is luxurious and well-equipped. Shame the chassis lets it down on ordinary B-roads

  • First Drive

    Mercedes ML 63 AMG

    Not only one of the most powerful SUV your money can buy, but also very rapid, encouragingly capable, fantastically refined and exceptionally practical.
  • First Drive

    Mercedes ML250 Bluetec

    Four-pot diesel ML does enough to make you wonder if you really need the extra urge and consumption of a six

Driven this week

  • Tesla Model S

    Tesla Model S

    Car review
    17 June 2013 5:16pm

    It's the world's most appealing electric car - but does that make it an appealing car?

  • Aston Martin DB9

    Aston Martin DB9

    Car review
    17 June 2013 8:10am

    The Aston Martin DB9 matches the emotion of a Ferrari but it adds practicality and offers an experience unmatched for versatility and all-round appeal

  • 2013 Nissan 370Z Nismo first drive review

    2013 Nissan 370Z Nismo first drive review

    First drive
    14 June 2013

    Nissan 370Z Nismo adds some harder-core appeal, but it feels like too little too late for Nissan’s street-fighting Z

  • Mazda CX-5

    Car review
    13 June 2013

    Can efficiency-boosting SkyActiv technology help the Mazda CX-5 raise the compact crossover bar?

  • Suzuki SX4 S-Cross

    Suzuki SX4 S-Cross

    Car review
    13 June 2013

    The SX4 S-Cross is a dependable, practical and frugal car, but can it compete with established mainstream rivals like the Nissan Qashqai?