What is it?
The first in a pair of new hybrid powered E-class models – the Mercedes-Benz E300 BlueTec Hybrid. Aimed primarily at European markets, it sets out to combine the typically high fuel economy of a modern day common rail four-cylinder diesel engine with the added fuel savings brought on by electric power.
Planned to go on sale in the UK in October in both saloon and estate body styles, the E300 BlueTec Hybrid mates the existing E250 CDI’s twin-turbocharged 2.1-litre combustion engine delivering 201bhp with a relatively small electric motor mounted in the forward section of the gearbox housing developing 27bhp, giving it a combined system output of 228bhp.
Energy for the electric motor is provided by a 0.8kWh lithium-ion battery that, like in the S400 BlueEfficiency Hybrid, is mounted up front in the right hand corner of the engine bay. There is no plug-in function – at least, not yet, so energy for the battery, which comes from Continental, is generated exclusively on the run during periods of trailing throttle and under braking. All up, the hybrid components, including the motor, battery and electronic management system, are said to weigh 100kg, endowing the new car with a kerb weight of 1840kg.
Drive is channelled to the rear wheels via a reworked version of the German car maker’s widely used seven-speed automatic gearbox that forgoes a traditional torque converter for a wet start up clutch similar to that used AMG on MCT equipped models. In line with developments brought to more conventional models, the so-called 7G-Tronic Plus unit supports automatic stop/start and offers the choice between either ECO or Sport modes.
What’s it like?
Accept that the E300 BlueTec Hybrid’s small battery is never going to allow it to run on electric power alone for extended periods or provide a significant increase in overall performance and it proves quite impressive.
The synchronous motor, supplied by Bosch, is used primarily to set the car in motion from standstill and for manoeuvring during parking.
With 184lb ft of torque available instantly, it glides away smartly and silently. You have to be gentle with the throttle, but the E300 BlueTec Hybrid can be made to run around town on electric power alone – albeit only for distances of up to 0.6 miles. The electric motor has been programmed to work alone at speeds at up to 22mph, at which the diesel engine cuts with a subdued but, for the most time, noticeable rattle of start-up vibration.
Integrated into the drive process, the diesel engine provides solid if not startling levels of performance. With 369lb ft of torque served up at 1600rpm the four cylinder unit offers up a reasonable level of shove on light to middling throttle loads.
As you back out of the throttle the diesel engine shuts down as part of a “sailing” function aimed at maximising fuel savings at speeds up to 100mph.
Overall refinement is sound – better than the E250 CDI, although the wet clutch can’t match the smoothness of the torque converter equipped automatic gearbox from step off, leading to some undesirable driveline shunt in stop-start traffic.
Put your foot down and the electric motor supports the efforts of the diesel engine, providing a boosting effect that endows the E300 BlueTec Hybrid with an impressive turn of speed. Mercedes-Benz claims 0-62mph in 7.5sec and a top speed of 150mph for the saloon and 7.8sec and a top speed of 144mph for the estate.
It is the fuel consumption figures, though, that its hybrid driveline engineers are most proud of. With a combined average of 67.3mpg for the saloon and 64.2mpg for the estate, the E300 BlueTec Hybrid is described as the most fuel efficient car in its class, offering a 10.8mpg and 10.9mpg improvement over the already frugal E250 CDI. This translates to CO2 emissions of 109g/km and 116g/km respectively. On paper it also beats the ActiveHybrid5 and A6 Hybrid.
With measured driving over 116 miles of country roads and autobahns, we managed to better the E300 BlueTec Hybrid’s official consumption, averaging 65.7mpg. Don’t expect these sort of figures in every day driving, but there’s no doubting the E300 BlueTec Hybrid’s eco credentials.
Should I buy one?
It’s already becoming clear that hybrids are more than just a passing fad. The E300 BlueTec Hybrid also proves that car makers are beginning to understand how to best realise their fuel saving potential. It doesn’t bring anything too radical in terms of technology. But by sticking to a relatively simple formula, the new Mercedes-Benz manages to provide small but valuable real world savings.
Look past is headlining consumption figures and the best thing about it is just how conventional it is to drive. That, and the fact that it manages to offer the same generous accommodation and luggage capacity as its more conventionally powered siblings. It won’t be a hit among private car buyers but expect to see it appeal to fleet buyers seeking something out of the ordinary.
Mercedes E300 Hybrid
UK pricing is yet to be announced but German prices start from €51,794 (£43,275) for the saloon and €55,007 (£45,960) for the estate model.
Join the debate
Re: Mercedes E300 Hybrid
This has to be the best non Japanese Hybrid yet. The small battery pack helps keep the price down, yet is obviously big enough to give a boost when needed. I am sure we will see more cars of this type very soon. There is no reason for Mercedes not to fit it to all their rear drive cars
Re: Mercedes E300 Hybrid
This has to be the best non Japanese Hybrid yet. The small battery pack helps keep the price down, yet is obviously big enough to give a boost when needed.
I would go further than that and say this is the best hybrid anywhere. Cars that use electricity to boost performance (á la Lexus and BMW) are missing a trick. We've already got high-performance, low-emission diesels (and BMW's and Jaguar's are particularly good) and these are very competitive with the current executive hybrids; what we need is the superior economy of a mid-range diesel paired with a simple electric motor to bring astonishing eco figures and respectable performance like we have here.
Re: Mercedes E300 Hybrid
I would go further than that and say this is the best hybrid anywhere.
You know what? I might further that still and say that this is the best efficient medium-sized luxury saloon. It works around town and on the motorway, is quiet, powerful and very economical, and is just as practical as its rivals, even with the battery.
Hybrids usually boast impressive figures that are unattainable in real life, but this diesel/electric combo is sure to be economical on both long journeys and in the urban environment. Finally, a hybrid that the real world can enjoy! Especially because it's actually based on one of the most complete cars on sale today.
Re: Mercedes E300 Hybrid
Technically miles behind the Vauxhall Ampera and will probably be well over £10,000 more.
Not a plug-in either and can only do 0.5 of a mile (yes half a mile) on battery power alone as opposed to the GM's 40 miles (in the real world). After 0.5 a mile you'd have to put up with a noisey fume producing diesel engine (compared to an electric motor) too!
Yep back in the real world you can forget Merc's claim of 63 mpg it'll never get anywhere near it and the added complication will only lower reliability, check out the bottom 10 in the Warranty direct list 40% are Mercedes! With the worst 2 being Mercedes
Oh it's ugly too.
Hydrogen cars just went POP
Re: Mercedes E300 Hybrid
Yep back in the real world you can forget Merc's claim of 63 mpg it'll never get anywhere near it and the added complication will only lower reliability, check out the bottom 10 in the Warranty direct list 40% are Mercedes! With the worst 2 being Mercedes
With measured driving over 116 miles of country roads and autobahns, we managed to better the E300 BlueTec Hybrid’s official consumption, averaging 65.7mpg. Don’t expect these sort of figures in every day driving, but there’s no doubting the E300 BlueTec Hybrid’s eco credentials.
Some cars can't get close to their claimed fuel consumption even in ideal real-world conditions, so the fact that this did is already impressive. In more typical driving scenarious (e.g. city driving) the fuel consumption would be higher, but given it already did over 65mpg in the hands of Autocar (and I don't even think the car was run-in yet...), I don't expect that figure to fall too much.
Generally Mercs tend to be actually relatively close to the claimed consumption figures - I once read a detailed test of how cars perform in the real world, and if I'm not mistaken an SLK did 0.8% better than the claimed figure - not much, but most of the other cars in the test did much worse than the claimed figures. Also, in the SL350 road test thread, there was someone who posted this:
we have this same engine in an EClass coupe and I just went and checked the trip computer and the economy is showing 7.6 litres per 100 km over the past 4000 km. which if my mental arithmetic is up to scratch is about 36 mpg and that is everything from heavy town traffic to 125 mph on the autostrada. For a big and luxurious car this is exceptional IMO. I find that particularly with Mercs their real world mileage is much closer to the quoted combined figure than many other manufacturers.
( http://www.autocar.co.uk/forums/t/22849.aspx )
As for reliability, everyone knows these types of 'surveys' should generally be taken with a pinch of salt - they only give a very rough general idea of things, and are usually quite inaccurate. From what I see/hear, Mercs are very good reliability-wise and I think are better than their German rivals.
Oh it's ugly too.
Looks are subjective, and the car in these pictures actually looks quite good IMO. I do think that the interior needs updating though.
- Follow your own star -
Re: Mercedes E300 Hybrid
Yep back in the real world you can forget Merc's claim of 63 mpg it'll never get anywhere near it and the added complication will only lower reliability, check out the bottom 10 in the Warranty direct list 40% are Mercedes! With the worst 2 being Mercedes
With measured driving over 116 miles of country roads and autobahns, we managed to better the E300 BlueTec Hybrid’s official consumption, averaging 65.7mpg. Don’t expect these sort of figures in every day driving, but there’s no doubting the E300 BlueTec Hybrid’s eco credentials.
Some cars can't get close to their claimed fuel consumption even in ideal real-world conditions, so the fact that this did is already impressive. In more typical driving scenarious (e.g. city driving) the fuel consumption would be higher, but given it already did over 65mpg in the hands of Autocar (and I don't even think the car was run-in yet...), I don't expect that figure to fall too much.
Generally Mercs tend to be actually relatively close to the claimed consumption figures - I once read a detailed test of how cars perform in the real world, and if I'm not mistaken an SLK did 0.8% better than the claimed figure - not much, but most of the other cars in the test did much worse than the claimed figures. Also, in the SL350 road test thread, there was someone who posted this:
we have this same engine in an EClass coupe and I just went and checked the trip computer and the economy is showing 7.6 litres per 100 km over the past 4000 km. which if my mental arithmetic is up to scratch is about 36 mpg and that is everything from heavy town traffic to 125 mph on the autostrada. For a big and luxurious car this is exceptional IMO. I find that particularly with Mercs their real world mileage is much closer to the quoted combined figure than many other manufacturers.
( http://www.autocar.co.uk/forums/t/22849.aspx )
As for reliability, everyone knows these types of 'surveys' should generally be taken with a pinch of salt - they only give a very rough general idea of things, and are usually quite inaccurate. From what I see/hear, Mercs are very good reliability-wise and I think are better than their German rivals.
Oh it's ugly too.
Looks are subjective, and the car in these pictures actually looks quite good IMO. I do think that the interior needs updating though.
Regarding mpg it says "Don’t expect these sort of figures in every day driving".
It wasn't a survey it was data that Warranty Direct collected and I don't think they come much bigger. Mercedes must be pretty upset they're being published. http://www.reliabilityindex.com/
I already knew that looks are subjective.
Hydrogen cars just went POP
Re: Mercedes E300 Hybrid
It wasn't a survey it was data that Warranty Direct collected and I don't think they come much bigger. Mercedes must be pretty upset they're being published. http://www.reliabilityindex.com/
Full credence must be given to these figures as I am certain they are accurate. However I note that the most reliable cars are the small family runabout or second car, whilst the most unreliable are the bigger and more complex beasts. Could it be that the bits that go wrong on luxury cars are the bits that the smaller cars don't have. Or could it be that their owners are more demanding? I don't see Merc's broken down on the side of the road, which makes me think it must be minor problems e.g. seat massagers not functioning correctly, put in for warranty.
Re: Mercedes E300 Hybrid
I don't see Merc's broken down on the side of the road, which makes me think it must be minor problems e.g. seat massagers not functioning correctly, put in for warranty.
In the first six months ownership, the only slight problem I've had with my Mercedes was with the glove box catch not always engaging properly, nothing else at all, and the car feels so solid it could have been hewn from a single lump of metal. Without question it's better put together than any of my previous cars, which include four Audis.
Re: Mercedes E300 Hybrid
Regarding mpg it says "Don’t expect these sort of figures in every day driving".
Which is why I said
Some cars can't get close to their claimed fuel consumption even in ideal real-world conditions, so the fact that this did is already impressive. In more typical driving scenarious (e.g. city driving) the fuel consumption would be higher, but given it already did over 65mpg in the hands of Autocar (and I don't even think the car was run-in yet...), I don't expect that figure to fall too much.
You can read my post for the full explanation.
It wasn't a survey it was data that Warranty Direct collected and I don't think they come much bigger. Mercedes must be pretty upset they're being published. http://www.reliabilityindex.com/
There are so many variables that it's difficult to take these results very seriously. Age of the cars, their mileage, roads on which they're driven, coniditions in which they're driven, how they're driven, what are the owners' expectations...and I think the vehicles in the 'study' (or whatever name you want to call it) only represent a small part of all vehicles sold. And I'm sorry, an S-Class represented by a picture of a CLS and a CL represented by the picture of an A-Class doesn't help their cause...
- Follow your own star -
Re: Mercedes E300 Hybrid
Regarding mpg it says "Don’t expect these sort of figures in every day driving".
Which is why I said
Some cars can't get close to their claimed fuel consumption even in ideal real-world conditions, so the fact that this did is already impressive. In more typical driving scenarious (e.g. city driving) the fuel consumption would be higher, but given it already did over 65mpg in the hands of Autocar (and I don't even think the car was run-in yet...), I don't expect that figure to fall too much.
You can read my post for the full explanation.
It wasn't a survey it was data that Warranty Direct collected and I don't think they come much bigger. Mercedes must be pretty upset they're being published. http://www.reliabilityindex.com/
There are so many variables that it's difficult to take these results very seriously. Age of the cars, their mileage, roads on which they're driven, coniditions in which they're driven, how they're driven, what are the owners' expectations...and I think the vehicles in the 'study' (or whatever name you want to call it) only represent a small part of all vehicles sold. And I'm sorry, an S-Class represented by a picture of a CLS and a CL represented by the picture of an A-Class doesn't help their cause...
No matter how many times you say "study" it wasn't one, it was data collected by a highly reputable warranty company and at the end of the day Mercedes have 4 cars in the bottom 10 and they aren't the only maker of luxuy cars.
In past Mercedes had an enviable reputation but costs cutting and factory relocation has had the effect of lowering it.
Hydrogen cars just went POP











