From £20,530
Outside-of-the-box premium hatchback finally does Mercedes credit, but this isn’t the definitive version

Our Verdict

Mercedes-Benz B-Class
The B-Class straddles the C-segment and MPV markets better than most models

Change is coming to Mercedes’ small-car range, and this new B-Class is the first taste of it.

What is it?

The most expensive version of Mercedes’ new B-class, the first examples of which have just landed in the UK, before the order books officially open next month. This test in the Mercedes B 200 CDi Sport gives us not only our first shot in a B-class on UK roads, but also our first test of the car in Sport specification, which brings with it shorter, higher-rate springs, uprated dampers and a quicker steering rack.

For a £1300 premium over ‘SE’ trim, ‘Sport’ also buys you a reversing camera, tinted windows, sports seats, 18in wheels with Goodyear runflat tyres, bi-xenon headlights and LED daytime running lights.

What’s it like?

An easy car to get in a muddle over – that’s for sure. The obvious competitor set to rate it against would be made up of five-seat people-movers like the VW Golf Plus, Ford C-Max and Renault Scenic. But when you clap eyes on this new B-class, you’ll realize it’s a more complicated prospect than that.

Mercedes calls the B-class a compact sports tourer, which isn’t a great deal of help. It’s more like a crossover hatchback. Measuring 4359mm in length and 1557mm tall, it’s actually less than 100mm taller, and a solitary millimeter longer, than a Ford Focus. And its closest notional rival is without doubt the Audi A3 Sportback.

There are clear MPV conventions inside the cabin. Mercedes has dispensed with the expensive old B-class’ ‘sandwich platform’, choosing instead a more ordinary underbody arrangement for the new car that has liberated low-level cabin space. So you sit fairly snug in the B-class, almost as low as you would in a normal five-door, but in a fairly upright, bent-legged, MPV-like driving position. There’s plenty of surplus headroom.

Rear passengers enjoy a little more space and comfort than they would in a normal five-door hatchback, with particularly impressive footroom available under the front seats. Provision for a fifth occupant is poor, though. There’s no seven-seat option, and even on flagship versions Mercedes will charge you extra for sliding second-row seats, a ski hatch and a folding front passenger seatback, all parts of its £515 Easy-Vario-Plus option.

So you might quibble over the generosity of this car’s standard specification (cruise control’s an extra, too). And yet the B-class’ cabin creates an impression of tangible richness, quality and value-for-money anyway, comprised of tactile and substantial plastics, chunky and expensive-feeling new switchgear, smooth leathers on the primary controls, and metallic trim flourishes like the air vents and interior doorhandles, which are attractive on the eye and cool to the touch.

At last, one of Daimler’s transverse-engined breed has the kind of interior to make it at least feel like a fully-paid-up, invulnerable Mercedes-Benz. This B-class may be no more impervious to use and the passage of time than the last, but it certainly strikes a much clearer and more convincing impression of quality from the get-go.

Cosseting refinement would probably be next on your wishlist for the perfect baby Benz. If it is, don’t buy a B-class Sport. While other versions may be better in this department, our test car was neither quiet-running nor particularly smooth-riding. Its low-profile runflat tyres crashed quite noisily over broken surfaces, and although its ‘amplitude-selective’ dampers brought better compliance over longer-wave crests and through compressions, the B 200 CDi Sport was disappointingly short on basic rolling comfort for any premium-brand family five-door – modern or otherwise.

Mechanical refinement is better, but still not brilliant. Although well-behaved in the broadest sense, Mercedes’ 1.8-litre turbodiesel engine is a little coarse at low speeds, and under wide throttle openings. Throttle response is good and in-gear performance plentiful, but in our test car it came accompanied by a slightly flatulent whooshing from the far side of the front bulkhead; the kind you’d expect of an aged W124 saloon with a hole in its manifold.

Is the B-class ‘Sport’ fun to drive? Not much. Which isn’t for the want of grip or lateral body control, both of which are as strong as you could wish for. The car’s dynamic shortcomings are buried slightly deeper. Press on down a particularly testing country road and you’ll find that the car’s vertical damping deteriorates, losing control of the movements of its tall body on the rebound stroke. Both a VW Golf and a Ford Focus would be more tied-down.

The bigger problem, however, is that the B-class Sport just isn’t very easy to gel with. The variable-ratio power steering quickens suddenly off-centre after a large ‘stability zone’ at the straight-ahead, which makes carving a smooth, accurate cornering line a bit of a guessing game. There’s also insufficient feedback though the steering wheel rim, and a little too much unpredictability about the car’s damping generally, for a keen driver to find much to really please.

Should I buy one?

Probably not. Which isn’t to say that you shouldn’t buy a B-class. Mercedes has undoubtedly succeeded with the execution of this car at the second attempt, creating a spacious, well-appointed and appealing unconventional upmarket five-door. We just wouldn’t recommend this particular version.

Our earlier continental tests would suggest than an SE-spec B 200 CDi, on smaller wheels and with a more appropriate chassis tune, would make a much more refined, fit-for-purpose luxury family car – something we’ll confirm when we get a chance to test one in the UK.

The Sport-spec car seems a bit incoherent; meticulously fitted out and lavish in some ways, rough and ready in others, and ultimately short on the composure and entertainment value that might redeem it.

Mercedes B 200 CDi BlueEffiiciency Sport

Price: £24,710; Top speed: 130mph; 0-62mph: 9.5sec; Economy: 64.2mpg; Co2: 121g/km; Kerbweight: 1475kg; Engine type, cc: 4cyls, 1796cc, turbodiesel; Power: 134bhp at 3600-4400rpm; Torque: 221lb ft at 1600-3000rpm; Gearbox: 6spd manual

Join the debate

Comments
18

10 February 2012

There is a Comfort Suspension No cost option on the B-Class configurator, if that floats your boat. And £265 for cruise control is a bit steep!

10 February 2012

Am i the only person that hates the recent trend of 'bolt on' sat nav units??? looks like an after thought or worse still an aftermarket unit. urrgghhh

10 February 2012

"....with a whole in its manifold". A whole what?

Back to the car, what really is the point of plenty of surplus headroom?

10 February 2012

The engine seems very good - 0-60 in 9.5s and 64mpg in a car this size is pretty good. I'd like to see this engine in the A-Class.

10 February 2012

Make it a bit lighter, lower the centre of gravity and loose the odd proportions. Fit smaller wheels but keep the interior and build on the economy and emissions. The new A Class could be rather good.

11 February 2012

I really feel that Mercedes are lowering the tone of their brand with the fwd A and B class - they should have put them in wth the Smart brand and kept just the proper Mercs, i.e. C class upwards, as Mercedes products.

It looks like an MPV, doesn't seem to drive that well and the performance is nothing special either.

And why release a model with Co2 of 121mg? Surely Mercedes engineers could have found a way to get it down to 120?

Cannot see these being a huge success, unless there are that many budget-restricted buyers desperate to get something that has a Mercedes badge on the front.

Mind you it is a little cheaper than the Diesel Civic tested recently, but I would still buy a 1 series!

11 February 2012

"For a £1300 premium over ‘SE’ trim, ‘Sport’ also buys you a reversing camera, tinted windows, sports seats, 18in wheels with Goodyear runflat tyres, bi-xenon headlights and LED daytime running lights."

Now, why on earth would I want a reversing camera or tinted windows as part of a 'sport' pack? I am seeing a trend of manufacturers putting irrelevant items in some of their trim levels and option packages. The cynical view says they are looking for more excuses to justify higher prices...


11 February 2012

The shame of it is, if Mercedes are aiming this car at young upwardly mobile families then most of the models sold are going to be in this somewhat substandard "Sports" specification.

I am surprised they have got it this wrong (although I don't doubt some of this is down to the run flat tyres) with the new model considering the poor reviews of the previous generation model.

[quote Johnny English]Now, why on earth would I want a reversing camera or tinted windows as part of a 'sport' pack? I am seeing a trend of manufacturers putting irrelevant items in some of their trim levels and option packages. The cynical view says they are looking for more excuses to justify higher prices[/quote]

Completely agree. It also goes to show "Sport" is nothing more than a badge and trim level and that no real engineering thought has gone in to making it more "sporty".

 

 

It's all about the twisties........

11 February 2012

[quote TegTypeR]I am surprised they have got it this wrong (although I don't doubt some of this is down to the run flat tyres) with the new model considering the poor reviews of the previous generation model.

[/quote]

Are Mercedes new to run flat tyres? It has taken BMW many years to engineer their cars suspension systems to work properly with run-flats, and of course they've dropped them from MINI and the lower models. Maybe Mercedes just haven't got to grips with them yet (no pun intended).

As for the sport pack, so many manufacturers think that front fog lights and rear tinted windows are 'sporty'. I just don't get it.

11 February 2012

Never been a fan of the B-class, which I've always thought too expensive for what it offers. And this version doesn't change my view on bit. Merc's current line up is pretty good on the whole. But the B is a dud.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka
  •  Maserati Ghibli Diesel
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    Maserati releases another range of updates for its range best seller, the Ghibli. We've driven the diesel version, but there's little improvement on before