From £51,550
Entry-level two-seater gets more basic cabin and 'improved' gear linkage

Our Verdict

Lotus Evora
The Evora uses a heavily tweaked version of Toyota's all-alloy 3.5-litre V6 engine

Lotus moves upmarket with a 2+2 GT, but is the Lotus Evora an everyday car?

  • First Drive

    Lotus Evora 414E Hybrid

    Lotus Evora development project sees a 1.2-litre engine twinned with two electric motors creating impressive, silent performance
  • First Drive

    Lotus Evora IPS

    IPS makes an Evora a viable car for those who just don’t want to drive with three pedals
13 January 2010

What’s new?

There are three points to cover here.

Firstly, that this is our first chance to try the entry-level, two-seat 2+0 Evora.

Secondly, that since we last tried the Evora, Lotus has made a few running changes to the gearbox linkage - a weak point of the early launch cars tested last year.

And thirdly, that this is an opportunity to try the Evora cabin in its basic form, without the optional £2550 Premium Pack and the extended leather trim that it brings.

What’s it like?

Let's deal with the 2+0 first. It is, in essence, exactly the same as the 2+2 except that the rear seats are replaced with a conveniently shaped storage shelf big enough for a few bags. Meaning you get the same splendidly good sports car for £1455 less.

Ditching the seats does save a little weight, but only around 10kg, so the effect is pretty marginal. And if I’m honest, that is all you really need to know about the 2+0, as there are no changes to the engine or suspension.

The more interesting point here are the changes Lotus have made to the gearbox. These amount to increasing the stiffness of the linkage to make the shift more positive, while also reducing the inertia of the clutch by around 20 per cent to improve the shift speed at higher revs. The result, I’m sad to report, is a bit of a mixed bag.

While the gearchange is less woolly, especially fore and aft, we are not talking about a huge step forward. Overall it is still a long way from being the rifle-bolt snick-snack gearchange the Evora deserves.

However, the changes to the clutch are more successful, making the change less stubborn, particularly from first to second gear.

There is however, a flip side to the improvements: the increased stiffness of the components means more noise and vibration is transmitted through the mechanism to the cabin.

The clutch changes also mean that it also fractionally harder to balance the engine revs at the clutch biting point, leading to the occasional kangaroo start. With time I’m sure you’d learn to live with this, but I’m not so sure about the increased gearbox noise.

As is often the case in engineering, you don’t get something for nothing, and the improvements in precision and control have to be traded against less isolation, but in this case I don’t feel the improvements go far enough. And the trade-off is too great.

Don’t get me wrong, the Evora it is still a cracking car to drive, and is still much quieter and more comfortable than any other Lotus, but when the boys from Hethel said they’d improved the gearchange I was hoping for more.

The news from the cabin is more uniformly positive. Resisting the temptation of the Premium pack does mean there is no choice of colour for the leather – it is black only – and you are denied the opportunity of the two-tone interior, but there is still plenty of leather. And those areas not covered in cow (mostly low down in the cabin) are finished in a not-unattractive fabric instead.

Should I buy one?

Our biggest gripe with the Evora has always been its price, so any method to keep this to a minimum is going to get our vote.

If it’s the Evora’s driving experience you are most interested in, then ditching the rear seats and sticking to the basic interior will do nothing to dilute the entertainment. And it's a sensible way to keep the cost below £50,000.

Jamie Corstorphine

Join the debate

Comments
9

14 January 2010

So you're paying a pitiful 1500 less for less refinement and a less attractive interior?

Sorry, but Lotus have lost the plot here and your article has blatantly wrapped this in politeness.

This will surely drive buyers to a Cayman S instead, and not without good reason.

14 January 2010

I would agree with Autocars biggest gripe - nice car, but it costs twice what it should.

14 January 2010

have you seen the new 'castrol extreme edge' (!) advert. its about football (?)

www.KOOOLcr.com

 

14 January 2010

This is the first time I've seen the Evora in red - and it looks rather tasty. Still expensive, though, but I'd still have one over a Cayman.

14 January 2010

You've really got to be a Lotus devotee to buy one of these over a Cayman, but perhaps there are enough of them to make the Evora sell enough to make it profitable. After all they can only manufacture the car in limited numbers compared with Porsche.

15 January 2010

Pointless change to a pointless car. I'm sure it is great to drive but why bother making a car bigger and heavier than the Elise when it effectively remains a 2-seater? I sat in one at the Zurich car show wondering whether it could replace my 911...not a chance. Much less space in the back - even my 5 year old daughter would have a problem fitting in. Plus so enclosed she wouldn't see anything. And then getting in an out....it would take a man braver than me to sell it to my wife as an alternative to a 911. Seems to me the Evora sits in no-mans land.

15 January 2010

I really want to like Lotus and looking at the past really shows up some interesting cars but these days they produce nothing to get me excited about. Got to hand it to them on the way they have kept going though.

16 January 2010

I don t like Lotus evora. I don t know wy but this car isn t for me. piese auto

29 September 2010

"but why bother making a car bigger and heavier than the Elise when it effectively remains a 2 seater?"

Tell me Mr Moore, why does Porsche bother making the 911 (which effectively has about the same back-seat room as an Evora +2) when it already makes a perfectly adequate 2 seater in the Cayman? And what kind of idiot buys one? ;-)

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2016 Audi A3 Sportback e-tron UK review
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    First UK drive finds the facelifted A3 Sportback e-tron remains a first-rate plug-in hybrid that is packed with tech if a little short on driver appeal
  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka