From £35,801
This car is about so much more than the headline figures

Our Verdict

Infiniti EX

The Infiniti EX offers an engaging drive, but has limited practicality and high running costs

  • First Drive

    Infiniti EX30d

    This car is about so much more than the headline figures
  • First Drive

    Infiniti EX37 GT

    Agile and nicely finished but not cheap or spacious
18 August 2010

What is it?

Finally the Infiniti EX has got its first diesel engine, around a year after UK launch, a few months after its bigger FX sibling and the new M saloon, and not a moment too soon by any other reckoning.

There is undoubtedly an appeal to the free-revving, 300bhp 3.7-litre petrol unit, until now the only engine option available in Infiniti’s coupé crossover, but its frenetic, 7500rpm personality is matched by thirst at the pumps.

See test pics of the Infiniti EX30d

This new direct-injection V9X diesel engine is identical to the one in the FX30d and loosely related to the unit in the V6 Laguna, but with a new turbocharger, block, crankshaft, intake manifold and sump.

It also has a compacted graphite iron block, both lighter and stiffer than cast iron, which improves refinement and adds strength between the cylinder banks, where the stresses are highest. The single variable-nozzle turbo is mounted in the 65deg vee.

What’s it like?

On the road it’s an impressive, if slightly vocal piece of engineering. For starters, it's got a redline above 5000rpm and spins freely up to it. Peak torque of 406lb ft appears at 1750rpm, which means that you can lock it in fourth gear (roughly 20mph/1000rpm) and dispatch challenging B-roads or motorway sliproads with at least as much ease as in the petrol version.

In fact, the pairing between diesel engine and gearbox is much better resolved and less fidgety than in the manual, but still retains the typical Infiniti-style changes, where it holds the lower gears for engine braking if you lift off from high revs.

Infiniti claims 33.2mpg on the combined cycle for the new engine and 224g/km of CO2. We saw a displayed 28.9mpg on the test route, which shows an improvement in fuel consumption of around 20 per cent over our petrol-engined EX37 long-term test car, which achieved 23mpg on the same roads.

That’s less than the claimed 40-plus mpg in the similarly priced Mercedes E350CDi coupé or substantially more expensive BMW 635d, but the Infiniti’s four-wheel drive and ‘everything but the kitchen sink’ spec in the Premium edition - which now includes a lane warning system that alerts you and redirects the car if you drift into the adjacent lane on a motorway - will readdress the balance with less economy-conscious drivers.

ShouId I buy one?

If you feel that there’s little more to the appeal of a car than its peak power output, top speed, 0-60mph time, fuel economy and boot space, then the EX30d is probably not the car for you.

Those headline figures hide the linearity of the power delivery, the absorbent ride, the seemingly endless supply of ‘techy’ gadgets (the Around view Monitor, an aerial view parking camera, is almost worth the list price on its own) and the beautifully finished, understated cabin.

If these much more emotional, less quantifiable features appeal, then it’s definitely worth taking one for a test drive.

Ed Keohane

Infiniti EX 30d GT Premium

Price: £41,220; Top speed: 137mph; 0-62mph: 7.9sec; Economy: 33.2mpg (combined); CO2: 224g/km; Engine: 6 cyls, 2993cc, turbocharged diesel; Power: 235bhp; Torque: 406lb ft; Gearbox: 7-spd automatic

See all the latest Infiniti reviews, news and video

Join the debate

Comments
4

24 August 2010

I know beauty is in the eye and all that, but none of the Infiniti models look 'right' to me.

They look like something Hyundai or Kia might have produced a few years ago..

24 August 2010

Bravo for coming out and saying that this car has something special about it that goes beyond the headline figures. Some people won't be able to get past the performance and economy figures compared to a BMW Xugly thing, but even though it is a subjective thing if a car effects the tester in that way it should be mentioned.

I wouldn't buy it though. Mostly because I can't afford it, but even if I could I don't like the styling.

25 August 2010

The looks alone make it worth buying, it's the most beautiful car in it's class. However, I not buying one because it's not sold here in Finland.

29 August 2010

The performance figures are rather impressive, not sure how the ride and handling will be though. Whilst it's nice to have something different from the mainstream choice (BMW/ Merc, RR Sport etc..) - I too am not sure about the style/ design of the vehicle.

Infiniti seems a big hit in the USA.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2016 Audi A3 Sportback e-tron UK review
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    First UK drive finds the facelifted A3 Sportback e-tron remains a first-rate plug-in hybrid that is packed with tech if a little short on driver appeal
  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka