From £21,765
Existing fans of the Honda CR-V will appreciate the functionality and efficiency of this new version, but Honda faces a tough challenge against some increasingly competitive rivals

Our Verdict

Honda CR-V
If the new CR-V looks more crossover than old-guard SUV it may be because the roofline is 30mm lower than before

Can the Honda CR-V bring anything new to a crowded arena?

14 November 2011

What is it?

The original Honda CR-V invented the compact crossover 16 years ago. Now, it’s back with a fourth-generation hitting U.S. showrooms before year-end, and due to follow on this side of the Atlantic next year.

Few models are more eagerly anticipated. The segment is among the market’s fastest-growing, but the Honda CR-V is also a critical product for the manufacturer which took a critical drubbing for the latest U.S. version of its mainstay Civic – and which has struggled to maintain momentum as the result of production cuts caused by the March 11 Japanese earthquake and tsunami.

What’s it like?

Honda can crow about the 2012 CR-V’s excellent use of space, front and rear with lots of useful storage nooks. Then there are the elegant new 1-touch fold-down rear seats.

On the downside, the interior mimics the latest Civic with too much hard plastic that suggests over-zealous cost-cutting. The exterior is reasonably attractive – from most angles – though the back of the greenhouse is a bit awkward.

The 2.4-litre inline-four engine is smooth and responsive, delivering excellent fuel economy for a compact crossover, even the all-wheel-drive model reaching 30mpg (US) on the motorway.

But Honda seems to have taken a ‘good enough’ approach, opting for port fuel injection where the competition offers direct injection, and a 5-speed gearbox where 6, 7, even 8-speeds are becoming the norm. The maker insists it doesn’t need to spend the extra money to top the rest but what happened to the Honda that once led the world in powertrain innovation

Our single biggest complaint covers the Honda CR-V’s new electric power steering system. It may save fuel but it is disconnected from the road and requires too much sawing as you work your way around the corners. Too bad, as the overall ride is reasonably pleasant with relatively little body roll.

The CR-V is one of Honda’s most consistent models, with few variations between US and European models – unlike Civic, which is completely different. However, there could still be differences when the car appears on this side of the Atlantic, particularly to the suspension and steering settings.

Should I buy one?

Current owners will likely appreciate the functionality and efficiency but the 2012 Honda CR-V will face a tough challenge regaining its sales lead from competitors like the equally all-new Ford Escape (to be sold as the Kuga in Europe).

Paul A. Eisenstein

Honda CR-V

Price: £21,000-30,000 (est); Top speed: 118mph; 0-62mph: na; Economy: 31mpg (est); CO2: 202g/km; Kerbweight: 1500kg; Engine type: 2354cc, four-cylinder, inline; Power: 185hp; Torque: 163lb ft; Gearbox: five-speed auto

Join the debate

Comments
25

16 November 2011

Looks like sort of VALVO crap xc 60 or so.. :) Nice interiour though. Lacks more powerful than 2.2 150 hp diesel, gas 2.0 is not appropriate.

16 November 2011

Looks better than before, but what with its much more capable rivals, I'm not sure that the new CR-V is going to be too much of a success. I'm sure it will reattract buyers of older CR-Vs, as Honda owners are a loyal old bunch, and why not? Honda's are practically bombproof.

src

16 November 2011

[quote Autocar]The original Honda CR-V invented the compact crossover 16 years ago. Now, it’s back with a fourth-generation hitting U.S. showrooms before year-end, and due to follow on this side of the Atlantic next year[/quote]

Honda did not invent the compact crossover, The Toyota RAV4 was the first compact crossover, The RAV4 was launched a year before the CRV. I bought a 3 Door RAV4 GX in June 1994 when the RAV4 was launched and then in June 1995 the 5 Door RAV4 was launched and then the Honda CRV was launched in 1995 in Japan. Europe did not get the first CRV until 1997.

16 November 2011

[quote Fidji]Looks better than before[/quote]

Well, I've got to disagree there. It looks awful.

[quote Fidji] Honda owners are a loyal old bunch[/quote]

Not this one! When faced with styling that poor and compromises everywhere we'll be going elsewhere in 2 years.


16 November 2011

[quote bomb]

[quote Fidji]Looks better than before[/quote]

Well, I've got to disagree there. It looks awful.

[/quote]

I'd still say that it's an improvement.

[quote bomb]

[quote Fidji] Honda owners are a loyal old bunch[/quote]

Not this one! When faced with styling that poor and compromises everywhere we'll be going elsewhere in 2 years

[/quote]

You've been warned Honda. Your market research clearly isn't up to scratch.

16 November 2011

i think it looks much better than the current car, but until its tried with a powertain for Europe there isnt much point in judging it. Another worry has to be Honda UKs attitude towards prices, which of late appears very optomistic

16 November 2011

[quote artill] Another worry has to be Honda UKs attitude towards prices, which of late appears very optomistic[/quote]

Agreed. The new Civic is ludicrously expensive for a car of its class, and you can now spend over £20k on a well-specced Jazz! In contrast, this CR-V will probably equate to £40k in top spec. Frightening!

16 November 2011

That rear styling is almost plagiarised from the XC60.

17 November 2011

This is another poorly thought out Honda design.Its not as bad as the Civic but that would take some beating.The Toyota RAV4 was the first (src got it spot on) and still better than the Crv in every way imo.

17 November 2011

I think Honda has got itself into a complete mess! After the deeply miserable Jazz of two years ago which became made just a little less awful followed by the dated, awkward Hovis loaf Civic which has just been replaced by something looking even worse, we now get a CRV that has managed the impossible...it's got desperately worse! What was already a very oddly styled car with two squashed up fronts at the same time and a glasshouse that just didn't fit the car at all, we now get a version that looks like a Korean mistake from 1999! This could be the Sassyong BooBoo for 2000!! What a frumpy, tired and dull car finished in "interesting maroon" with a 2.4 petrol engine that nobody will actually want! HONDA...FOR GOODNESS SAKE WAKE UP!!!! Fire your so called "designers" right now because whatever you think, they are dreaming up well off target rubbish!!

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2016 Audi A3 Sportback e-tron UK review
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    First UK drive finds the facelifted A3 Sportback e-tron remains a first-rate plug-in hybrid that is packed with tech if a little short on driver appeal
  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka