Test bed may lead to Renault Megane R26 and Ford Focus RS rival

Our Verdict

Honda Civic Type-R
Honda's new Civic Type R is powered by a 306bhp 2.0-litre turbocharged four cylinder engine

Probably the most capable front-wheel-drive car in production today, with only limited edition specials getting close

26 August 2009

What is it?

Officially it's a concept – the Honda Civic Type R Mugen Concept, to be precise. It's a brand-building exercise for both the Civic Type R and Mugen Euro, the semi-official tuning arm of Honda, which has only had a presence in Europe for the past two years.

Unofficially it's also a working prototype, built to gauge how well received this car might be if put into limited-scale production. That would further boost the image and awareness of Mugen, and could herald the launch of more Mugen-branded tuning products and upgrades - perhaps even sold through Honda dealers.

For now, though, it's a one-off. And it's a thorough job. Mugen Euro (based in Northampton) has taken a Swindon-built Civic Type R and, first, got to work on the engine. Traditionally that's Mugen's speciality and a lot of its motorsport expertise has gone into this. There's a new airbox, intake manifold and stainless steel exhaust on the outside, with new pistons, throttle body, camshaft and valve springs on the inside.

New mapping has increased the engine's rev limit to 8500rpm, with peak power of 237bhp at 8300. The VTEC cam timing change is left at 5500rpm and is still a big old kick; maximum torque (only 157lb ft of it) doesn't come in until 6250rpm. Below 5500 it only has around 135lb ft and barely more than 140bhp. The power curve is as steep as they come.

However, you don't need loads of torque in a light car, so Mugen has thrown 105kg out, by using composite body panels at the front, ditching the rear seats, fitting new front seats and using lighter, forged wheels which alone save around 20kg. The power-to-weight ratio is better even than the Japan-only Mugen Civic Type RR saloon, of which Mugen made 300 in 2007.

Unlike the Japanese Mugen Civic, the British-built Mugen Civic retains a torsion beam rear axle. Mugen – and Honda – want to make this car work as a driver's tool without cutting the torsion beam and fitting fully independent rear suspension; otherwise, the thinking is, it's not a proper European Civic Type R any more. It's a commendable attitude. Springs and dampers are new, the geometry is altered slightly and Mugen is still trialling different kinds of tyres. Other changes include the body styling bits, a short-shift kit for the gear lever and uprated brakes with four-pot front calipers.

What's it like?

Loud. And not just when you're going for it. Tuned naturally aspirated engines, and particularly four-pot Hondas, make a really pleasing, hollow sound at low revs. They sound expensive, refined, somehow thoroughly engineered. Well, the Mugen Concept does this with the added backbeat of excessive exhaust parp. Perhaps a bit too much; Mugen knows there's a resonance at around 4000rpm and is going to dampen it out.

Nevertheless it's a smooth, free-revving engine with none of the hunt and lumpiness that a 120bhp/litre car would have had a few years ago. It's very tractable, and the shorter-shifting six-speed 'box is really slick.

Trundling around town reveals a ride that's unsettled, but no more so than the standard Civic Type R. The Mugen is not noticeably harsher, even if it is firmer; perhaps the lighter unsprung weight comes into play, because it feels a mite more composed. The steering is more positive, too, though still quite light.

Up the speeds and the ride's still on the lumpy side. On a motorway you can detect a constant patter from the back end, while on A and B-roads it lacks the fluidity of damping that you'd find in, say, a Renault Megane R26 or a Ford Focus RS. Don't get me wrong: the Civic is better than the standard car, and its front and rear ends feel better connected. But it's as if there's too much rebound damping: it springs back too harshly over bumps and lumps in the road, it fidgets too much and you feel a bit tossed from side to side.

Still, it is good fun. That engine is thoroughly peachy when worked hard, the Recaro front seats are brilliant, the driving position is up to scratch and there's even a little steering feel – although it's mostly when the front wheels, under power, give a little tug here and there. The new brakes are superb, too.

Ultimately, though, the Focus and Megane cover ground just as quickly and tell you just as much about what's going on, while subjecting the car's body – and yours – to less kickback.

Should I buy one?

The question should really be: should Mugen make one (or 20)?

I'd say yes (who wouldn't want them to make a car that revs to 8500rpm?) but I think there's more work to be done on the chassis yet. Some prices have been mooted elsewhere – £30k here, £35k there – none of which have come from Mugen. Renault had trouble shifting all of its R26Rs, don't forget.

But at under £25,000, on a limited production run, I reckon it could be a success – and crucially, pave the way for more Mugen-inspired products in future.

Join the debate

Comments
16

27 August 2009

I raced this actual car at goodwood and it handles nicely on the track the rear beam is still a problem and the front hobby horse a bit loose. For £25k you could get a second hand Saab 9-5 and a caravan and still have change for ferry moneyand fishfingers

27 August 2009

it will have a chance at sales if it is priced no more than £25k i think.

an s2000 costs £28k so shouldn't be more than that.

R26R is £24k similar performance but french.

£25k should be bang on.

28 August 2009

Why go to all this effort? Honda already make this car for Japan. OK its in the saloon body, which is better looking (to me) stiffer, and more importantly has the proper independant suspension civics should have. And then there is a Company called Litchfield who import them and put them on the road here for 23K.

If there is a market for a better type R, why not just officially import this car?

28 August 2009

the uk version has better power to weight ratio. so in some ways its better car.

28 August 2009

I still think that no matter what they do this will never be a match for any of the previous incarnations. Missed it by that much...

28 August 2009

It will be the price that's the killer, the exchange rate with the Yen is shocking at the moment and there are some really good hot hatches for decent money already.

If all the modifications are done in the UK and parts don't have to be imported, then it may stand a chance of having a cheap enough list price.

28 August 2009

Before anyone says, yes I am slightly biased, but it seems pointless to make a silk purse out of a sows ear (and charge accordingly).

The current civic was built to a specification - price in this case. Unless there is some serious re-engineering of this car (which of course costs) it is a pointless exercise. Don't get me wrong, before I read the article, I wanted the car to do well.

As Artil said, why bother when Honda already produce the cracking JDM Civic Type R which handles better and goes just as hard for what appears to be less money. I know type approval costs, but with some careful thought, I am sure Honda could sell the JDM model semi officially?!?!

 

 

It's all about the twisties........

29 August 2009

Now if they could only beef up he torque curve, actually fit suspension and do something about that ugly body, oh and make it cheaper, then they'd be on to a winner!

Peter Cavellini.

30 August 2009

Yawn, a baby boomer car made to be peppy to try to get us kids of baby boomers to buy it with increased questionable reliability, an ostenatious price tag considering the car's content, and very unsavory Next generation Renderings that can possibly doom it to disaster is not a good combination.

The days of the Civic are about done, The C'eed in Europe and the Forte in America will finally hammer the last nails in the coffin.

31 August 2009

But don't you think some cars aren't what they seem?, from a distance most cars look great but on closer inspection you find the body is well made, good panel gaps etc, but when you get inside you discover low rent plastics, cheap leather, not particularly well screwed together,odd rattles, bits fall off within weeks, now i don't care how long a warranty your given, if you've handed over a serious piece of you hard earned, then you should get what you expect.Now my wife and i recently changed brands(car ones)from Ford too Seat and overall the Seat is good, but, some of the detail plastics are just plain cheap or look odd,the trim round thr rear view mirror is an odd shade of light grey whichlooks cheap, the leather used on the steering wheel is better quality than the Ford's, these are just two +/- areas, no, 7 year warranties or not if the inside doesn't match the outside quality..........!?

Peter Cavellini.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka
  •  Maserati Ghibli Diesel
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    Maserati releases another range of updates for its range best seller, the Ghibli. We've driven the diesel version, but there's little improvement on before
  • Tipo Front
    First Drive
    21 September 2016
    New Fiat Tipo offers impressive space and practicality for a reasonable price. We try the 1.6 diesel on the demanding roads of North Wales
  • Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150
    First Drive
    20 September 2016
    The Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150 makes perfect sense: it's spacious, tidy to drive for an SUV and cheap to run