What is it?
A new, three-cylinder 1.0 litre turbocharged version of the Ford Focus, driven here in 123bhp form but also available with 99bhp.
This engine, whose cylinder block has barely the area of a sheet of A4 paper, arrives first in the Focus because its high-tech gadgetry (variable valve timing, miniature turbo, advanced electronics, direct fuel injection system) would make it expensive for the Fiesta.
The triple's efficiencies – which include super-efficient combustion, stop-start, a remarkably wide torque spread (with peak 125lb ft torque that overboosts to 148lb ft for 30 seconds to assist acceleration and passing manoeuvres), a six-speed gearbox and a 30kg weight saving over the front wheels – result in CO2 output of just 114g/km and combined fuel consumption of 56.5mpg for the six-speed version.
Five-speed figures are a little sharper, but that model loses a bit of performance against the six-speeder's 120mph top speed and 11.3sec 0-62mph acceleration. Both versions bring impressive tax advantages to business users.
What’s it like?
Even such promising paper figures don't prepare you for the driving experience. You barely hear the thing start, and it idles so smoothly you'd swear it had stalled. Your brain tells you such a small engine will need lots of revs off the mark, but it gets going easily because the combination of a tiny turbo, advanced electronic engine management and double variable valve timing give it amazing oomph in the low gears, even below 2000rpm (though the redline's 6700rpm).
It flows through the gears, always quiet but sounding more like a thoroughbred six than anything mainstream. You'll enjoy revving it, but you soon learn that changing up in the 3000s (aided by a smooth clutch and a slick six-speeder) delivers far better economy with pretty good performance.
Amazingly, the car is even long-legged. You've got to be indicating nearly 90mph before the tacho shows 3000rpm in sixth, and it can maintain this up hill and down dale. It is already clear, however, that like Fiat's TwinAir this Focus triple is an economy car for the willing. We turned 52mpg on a medium-fast, 80-mile trip through southern Spain, where another crew, not much faster, returned economy in the late 30s. You have to understand Ford's triple to make it sing for its supper.
Should I buy one?
This engine is a game-changer. It shows just how much life remains in petrol engines of a suck-squeeze-bang-blow persuasion. And that nowadays there is indeed a substitute for cubic inches.
Daft as it may sound, the tiny but super-advanced turbo triple – engineered in Dunton, England – confers a remarkable new layer of smoothness and refinement on the Ford's big-selling C-segment hatchback that is so obvious, so impressive and so refreshing that it leaves the four-cylinder models gasping.
Ford EcoBoost 1.0 Zetec 5dr
Price: £17,745; Top speed: 120mph; 0-62mph: 11.3sec; Economy: 56.5mpg (combined); CO2: 114g/km; Kerb weight: 1240kg (est); Engine: 3 cyls in line, 999cc, turbo, petrol; Installation: Front, transverse, FWD; Power: 123bhp at 6000rpm; Torque: 125lb ft (148lb ft on overboost) at 1500-4500rpm; Gearbox: 6-spd manual; Fuel tank: 55 litres; Boot: 316/1101 litres; Wheels: 7Jx16in; Tyres: 215/55 R16.
Join the debate
Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec
i don't see the worry is with reliability, a 2.0 straight6 turbo, producing 200 to 250bhp wouldn't exactly be waiting to explode... no scimping on oil changes, and an occasional "italian tune up" should be all it needs.
my questions are these: when will it be in a caterham?? and, how long do i have to wait for this technology to get into motorbikes?!
Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec
I had a Golf 1.2 TSI as a hire car recently - it went surprisingly well, but the fuel consumption wasn't particularly impressive (I wasn't trying for economy, but nor was I particularly gassing it). Somewhere in the mid-high 30s. The 2.0 diesel Octavia I had for the other direction did 55 mpg without trying
I aslo hired a 1.2TSI Golf recently. It did 35mpg around country lanes, early 40's mpg driving quickly on the motorway and a very impressive 50mpg when caught in 50mph traffic for 50 miles on a single carraigeway.
My father's Yeti has the same engine, but is considerably less economical on motorways thanks to the aerodynamics....
I think the take home message is that these cars can have much wider bands of economy than our older ones. My old Jaguar XJS never deviated by more than 4 mpg whatever you did!
Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec
If Ford would do the decent thing and buy Lotus, this engine would be great in a base model Elise. Might make it even lighter - which it should be.
Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec
This very sounds like they've finally cracked the whole downsizing thang.
Although I also do wonder about the longevity and post warranty hassles any would be second hand buyer would face.
Surely as a 3 pot this thing must have balancing shafts galore, does anyone know how bad the NVH would get of they broke? Anyone have that happen to them in a 3 pot?
Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec
If Ford would do the decent thing and buy Lotus, this engine would be great in a base model Elise. Might make it even lighter - which it should be.
Now that would be interesting... 
Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec
.
Surely as a 3 pot this thing must have balancing shafts galore, does anyone know how bad the NVH would get of they broke?
No it doesn't. Just clever engineering instead:
http://corporate.ford.com/news-center/press-releases-detail/pr-allnew-fuelefficient-10litre-ford-35790
Amongst other highlights:
"Rather than employ the traditional method of adding energy-draining
balancer shafts, Ford engineers have deliberately “unbalanced” the
flywheel and pulley to offset the engine configuration. Ford believes
these innovations combined with optimised engine mounts will deliver a
truly refined performance feel perfected during 720,000 kilometres of
tests – including 360,000 kilometres of durability trials and 10,000
kilometres of environmental testing."
Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec
I had a Golf 1.2 TSI as a hire car recently - it went surprisingly well, but the fuel consumption wasn't particularly impressive (I wasn't trying for economy, but nor was I particularly gassing it). Somewhere in the mid-high 30s. The 2.0 diesel Octavia I had for the other direction did 55 mpg without trying.
Question: if they were both parked outside and you had to chose one for the weekend, which one would it be? And would it be different if I was paying for your fuel?
Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec
My old Jaguar XJS never deviated by more than 4 mpg whatever you did!
So, would that constitute a 50% swing? Just kidding
Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec
I can't read past the fact its £17.5k for a 1.0 Ford hatchback. Complete non starter IMO if that price is correct.
Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec
I can't read past the fact its £17.5k for a 1.0 Ford hatchback. Complete non starter IMO if that price is correct
Would you prefer a 1.6 at the same price then? Zetec starts at £16.995 according to their website. If you get a 1.6 with the same output its the same price. So why is it a non-starter then?
I would tend to suggest you get a slightly better dynamic benefit with less weight over the wheels







