Steve Cropley
7 February 2012

What is it?

A new, three-cylinder 1.0 litre turbocharged version of the Ford Focus, driven here in 123bhp form but also available with 99bhp.

This engine, whose cylinder block has barely the area of a sheet of A4 paper, arrives first in the Focus because its high-tech gadgetry (variable valve timing, miniature turbo, advanced electronics, direct fuel injection system) would make it expensive for the Fiesta.

The triple's efficiencies – which include super-efficient combustion, stop-start, a remarkably wide torque spread (with peak 125lb ft torque that overboosts to 148lb ft for 30 seconds to assist acceleration and passing manoeuvres), a six-speed gearbox and a 30kg weight saving over the front wheels – result in CO2 output of just 114g/km and combined fuel consumption of 56.5mpg for the six-speed version.

Five-speed figures are a little sharper, but that model loses a bit of performance against the six-speeder's 120mph top speed and 11.3sec 0-62mph acceleration. Both versions bring impressive tax advantages to business users.

What’s it like?

Even such promising paper figures don't prepare you for the driving experience. You barely hear the thing start, and it idles so smoothly you'd swear it had stalled. Your brain tells you such a small engine will need lots of revs off the mark, but it gets going easily because the combination of a tiny turbo, advanced electronic engine management and double variable valve timing give it amazing oomph in the low gears, even below 2000rpm (though the redline's 6700rpm).

It flows through the gears, always quiet but sounding more like a thoroughbred six than anything mainstream. You'll enjoy revving it, but you soon learn that changing up in the 3000s (aided by a smooth clutch and a slick six-speeder) delivers far better economy with pretty good performance.

Amazingly, the car is even long-legged. You've got to be indicating nearly 90mph before the tacho shows 3000rpm in sixth, and it can maintain this up hill and down dale. It is already clear, however, that like Fiat's TwinAir this Focus triple is an economy car for the willing. We turned 52mpg on a medium-fast, 80-mile trip through southern Spain, where another crew, not much faster, returned economy in the late 30s. You have to understand Ford's triple to make it sing for its supper.

Should I buy one?

This engine is a game-changer. It shows just how much life remains in petrol engines of a suck-squeeze-bang-blow persuasion. And that nowadays there is indeed a substitute for cubic inches.

Daft as it may sound, the tiny but super-advanced turbo triple – engineered in Dunton, England – confers a remarkable new layer of smoothness and refinement on the Ford's big-selling C-segment hatchback that is so obvious, so impressive and so refreshing that it leaves the four-cylinder models gasping.

Ford EcoBoost 1.0 Zetec 5dr

Price: £17,745; Top speed: 120mph; 0-62mph: 11.3sec; Economy: 56.5mpg (combined); CO2: 114g/km; Kerb weight: 1240kg (est); Engine: 3 cyls in line, 999cc, turbo, petrol; Installation: Front, transverse, FWD; Power: 123bhp at 6000rpm; Torque: 125lb ft (148lb ft on overboost) at 1500-4500rpm; Gearbox: 6-spd manual; Fuel tank: 55 litres; Boot: 316/1101 litres; Wheels: 7Jx16in; Tyres: 215/55 R16.

Join the debate

Comments
75

Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec

1 year 14 weeks ago

Looks very impressive, especially if its as much fun to drive implied. Not sure how well it would sound though, i had a hateful 3cyc yaris as a replacement car before and couldnt stand the drone it made. As stated in the article these emmisions and ecomony would be great for company car drivers mind you.

This engine combined with hybrid tech perhaps??

Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec

1 year 14 weeks ago

Just got back from Ladbrookes. They won't take my money on this engine being released in the Fiesta within 6 months. Had to put my cash on the Harry Rednapp verdict.

Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec

1 year 14 weeks ago

Sounds brilliant. I'd want to see real-world consumption figures as it rather sounds like this is partly a "EURO Consumption Figure" special. If fuel economy works out as being only in the high 30s mpg rather than the claimed mid-50s it rather makes you wonder why Ford bothered adding all this potentially troublesome technology in the first place ?
And then they have the nerve to charge more for it !

Missing my Prius - need a new car.

Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec

1 year 14 weeks ago

I've got that awful feeling (again) of reading the Honest John "What's Bad" page on this in ten years time. Think I'd want one of these with the assurance of the manufacturer's warranty, and preferably not one from the first 18 months of production. Apart from that (!) I'm sure it's great! Would be intrigued to have a drive in one.

  • Let depreciation be your friend...

Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec

1 year 14 weeks ago

Sorry everyone - but there is no replacement for displacement. E Smile

Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec

1 year 14 weeks ago

BriMarsh wrote:

I've got that awful feeling (again) of reading the Honest John "What's Bad" page on this in ten years time. Think I'd want one of these with the assurance of the manufacturer's warranty, and preferably not one from the first 18 months of production. Apart from that (!) I'm sure it's great! Would be intrigued to have a drive in one.

C'mon Ford ( whoops ) let's have a 5 year warranty on this motor!

Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec

1 year 14 weeks ago

Quoted performance looks poor in view of the power to weight ratio. Will await full road test with interest ( and reliability feedback ).

Anonymous

Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec

1 year 14 weeks ago

Very impressive engine! Although like others, I think it's more likely to get 40 mpg or so in real conditions. If this was put in the Fiesta or Ka, it would be brilliant!

On a side note, anyone else notice the interior picture was from a diesel? Tongue

Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec

1 year 14 weeks ago

If i drive this car like i am 400 years old then i will get 50mpg.

Otherwise why pay £300 per month depreciation for three years for an extra 10mpg over a 1999 citroen saxo 1.4 that will also give 50mpg if i drive under the speed limits and on half throttle - and that has NO depreciation!

And HOW can they justify the spending of all that CO2 to build a car that is just 10mpg better than the previous version?

Everyone is jumping on the efficiency bandwagon i am afraid and not thinking clearly about why.

Re: Ford Focus 1.0 Ecoboost Zetec

1 year 14 weeks ago

Volvophile wrote:

I'd say these downsized turbo engines will be a bundle of trouble in years to come.

Well judging by your user name, I would say better get used to it, because this is the route Volvo are going, with no engines with more than 4 cylinders.

Please register or login to post a comment.

Our Verdict

Can the Ford Focus, a perennial class leader, still hold sway in its third iteration?

Driven this week