Matt Saunders
28 March 2012

What is it?

Yet another drive story about the ‘Toyobaru’ sports car. But it’s an important one, so no dozing off at the back.

Last week, Editor-at-large Steve Sutcliffe brought you a report from behind the wheel of a practically finished Toyota GT-86 after a session on track in Spain. This week, it’s Subaru’s turn: we’ve had a day in a final production version of the BRZ – this time, on the road.

European roads, mind you, and in a left-hand drive car. All the same, we’re now in a position to tell you exactly how livable, practical, comfortable and generally usable this tempting new rear-drive sports coupe is, as well as how exciting it is away from the painted kerbing.

There seems little point repeating some already widely know vitals about this car. For now, we’ll settle for reminding you of three things. Firstly: that, although the ‘Toyobaru’ project was majority funded by Toyota, and the car was designed and styled mainly by the relative automotive giant of the partnership, the BRZ (just like its sister car) is built by, and has been engineered by, Subaru. Secondly: that at its heart is one of Subaru’s utterly distinctive boxer engines, which contributes decisively to its character and performance, as we’ll go on to explain. And thirdly: that, although it’s only got 197 normally aspirated horses, the BRZ weighs just 1239kg – even in this range-topping trim. That’s less than a Porsche Cayman R; and damn near 300kg less than the lightest Nissan 370Z.

Both the Lotus Elise and VW Golf GTi have poorer power-to-weight ratios than this. Which is something performance car devotees would do well to remember before dismissing this car for the want of a headline-grabbing power output.

What’s it like?

It may be early for these kind of pronouncements, but in this tester’s opinion, this is just about the best driver’s car to come out of Japan since the heady days of Supra and NSX. That statement includes the Nissan GT-R – a performance heavyweight that could crush the BRZ on half-throttle, but that also doesn’t have half the multi-faceted subtlety or vivacity.

All of those preliminary track impressions of the car are to be believed; this really is a sports car with a rare capacity to excite, that handles with the sort of poise and involvement that you could lose weeks exploring.

The even better news is that, on the road, its less spectacular charms are just as distinguishing. On the road, the BRZ’s superbly informative and responsive steering drags you into its driving experience by your fingertips. The car’s finely-honed brake pedal feel and perfectly balanced chassis let you attack corners with ultimate confidence. Back on the power, its blissfully slack-free driveline serves up instant traction and an absorbingly manageable cornering attitude from apex to exit.

And away from the bend, that unencumbered flat four engine spins up beyond 7000rpm with just enough urgency to make the BRZ feel thrilling.

But – and this bit’s quite key – not so much sheer poke to feel at all over-specified or antisocial for the road. The BRZ isn’t as fast as some cars at its price: it’s a more modern, mature performance car than that, appreciation of which requires a more refined palette than your typical forum brag artiste or traffic light grand prix champ might possess. It could use more low- and mid-range torque, particularly. But, like a middle-order hot hatchback, you can get a sense of bang-for-your-buck reward from the car simply because you can deploy 100 per cent of its power through 2nd and 3rd gears with regularity – and, in the right circumstances, without too much fear for your licence. And when you do, you’ll just adore how quickly and precisely the engine responds to the accelerator, and the gruff boxer bark it makes at full load.

Key to the BRZ’s superb handling is its low centre of gravity. At 460mm above the concrete, the BRZ’s centre of gravity is lower than that of a Mazda MX5, even.

And because it doesn’t roll hard, the car doesn’t need massive wheels and tyres, or particularly stiff suspension, to deliver its dynamic composure. Which is why it also rides pleasingly quietly and comfortably – for a sports coupe, at least. The BRZ, which has the firmer chassis setup of the ‘Toyobaru’ twins, jostles its occupants a little over choppy surfaces, but otherwise has quite generous compliance and entirely unobtrusive long-distance manners.

The BRZ’s practicality and material quality is to be praised, too. You’ll find more usable space in the back seats here that you will in an Audi TT or Peugeot RCZ. That may not amount to a lot, but it’s fair enough in a car with a longways engine, rear-wheel drive and the same wheelbase as a Mini Clubman. You’ll also find a proper soft-touch dashboard, some hardy, tactile and modern-looking switchgear and, in our range-topping car, a red-stitched part-leather interior. Elsewhere the ‘Toyobaru’ has shinier and cheaper materials, sure: it wears them like something of a ‘less-is-more’ badge of honour. But overall, the interior looks and feels up to scratch, and its ethos is entirely as it should be.

Should I buy one?

Which one, you mean? On this evidence, that should be entirely down to availability and personal taste. The BRZ’s chassis may be the more focused of these two new Japanese sports car twins, but it’s still absorbent and fully appropriate for everyday use.

Meanwhile, reviewers of the GT-86 haven’t exactly lamented its wallowing suspension tune during earlier track tests. Which may lead you to conclude that these two cars are sufficiently similar to be considered identical in most meaningful ways.

Both cars should make fantastically involving weekend drivers, whether you spend them on track days, at hillclimbs or just blasting across the countryside; both cars will, on this evidence, be comfortable and practical enough to double up as weekday transport.

And both will be available for less than £25k before the end of the year. If the arrival of Subaru’s stripped-out BRZ late in 2012 doesn’t deliver that, the improving value of Sterling against the Yen certainly should.

Other £25k coupes may be faster accelerating, better to own or easier to live with. But simply put, even in cars as enthralling to drive as the Mazda MX5 and as focussed as a RenaultSport Clio Cup, it’ll be hard to have more fun for less.

Subaru BRZ Premium

Price: £26,500 (tbc); 0-62mph: 7.6sec; Top speed: 140mph; Economy: 36.2mpg; CO2: 181g/km; Kerbweight: 1239kg; Engine type, cc: 4cyls horizontally opposed, 1998cc, atmospheric; Power: 197bhp at 7000rpm; Torque: 151lb ft at 6400-6600rpm; Gearbox: 6-spd manual

Join the debate

Comments
51

Re: Subaru BRZ Premium

1 year 11 weeks ago

Ioanides wrote the following post at Wed, Mar 28 2012 9:05 PM:

mattlad wrote:
xopher78 wrote:

I love the idea of these cars, but am going to " bleat" about the performance. 151lb/ft at 6400rpm is awful. For B-road fun, you're going to need to overtake a few people making less progress than you... these cars sound prohibitively wheezy with such a narrow band of accessible power.

A Honda S2000 has 153lb/ft of torque at 7500rpm and I don't hear owners complaining about their lack of go. 0-60 is just willy waving anyway, how often do you do it? It's driveability that counts day to day.

Because we can rev them till 9000 rpm and there are 240 hp on tap. And it's light and one of the most beautiful two seater convertibles ever made. Big difference from this toyobaru...

I think you'll find the Toyota / Subaru is about to 60 to 70kg lighter than the Honda S2000........

Re: Subaru BRZ Premium

1 year 11 weeks ago

73henny wrote:

Its coming. See below.

Note how AE have this but not Autocar. Come on, keep up!

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/281035/subaru_brz_sti_planned.html

Nice find. Well done.

Re: Subaru BRZ Premium

1 year 11 weeks ago

petrolheadinrussia wrote:

The more I read the more I wonder. Both these manufacturers have stood aside from WRC for quite a while now. Both have been at one time or another winners of the manufacturers title and have had their drivers at the top of the table come end of season. So... if this car is as good as they say..I wonder..will they make it 4wd and rally again? That would be the best news I have heard in years. Much better than 'polo" or "mini" playing around. OK ok so the Polo might be a flyer - we will see. Hopefully Loeb will stay 1 more season just to kill the Polo off as being the great new car.

From what I understand this car could be used in the FIA's new RGT class (rear wheel drive, used on the tarmac events). We need more cheap(ish) RWD rally cars to make the sport exciting again.

Like many others I can't wait to drive one. Question will be whether it will be as practical as a small hatchback. If so it could make a great little daily driver for those of us with something quicker for the weekends.

Re: Subaru BRZ Premium

1 year 11 weeks ago

6th.replicant wrote:

Excellent all-round, especially since we seem to have established that the actual 0-60 - according to US road tests - is in the mid 6s.

Need to put the BRZ's US 0-60 stats into perspective:

InsideLine.com's test clocked the BRZ's 0-60 in 7.3secs. Article and vid here - clickety

Motor Trend clocked the BRZ's 0-60 in 6.4secs during a group test. However, in the same test, Motor Trend recorded a Golf GTI (DSG 'box) in 5.8secs. Article here - clickety

Perhaps the GTI's impressive 0-60, irrespective of DSG, is telling? Therefore, suspect that Motor Trend was using a test track with very grippy asphalt? Hmmm...

Re: Subaru BRZ Premium

1 year 11 weeks ago

Lanehogger wrote:

As good as some of its rivals might be, I can't help but think the 370Z, Z4, SLK, TT and Boxster/Cayman for example have all been wrong-footed and now appear cumbersome and over-engineered for very little gain and benefit.

Good observations. I have an older Z4 Roadster 3.0 si, and, while it is elegant and well done, it does lack a certain crispness, showing a kind of anesthetized turn-in on cornering, as you did note**. You are right: they may be a bit over-wrought for what you get. But the BRZ may still have missed one significant opportunity: its weight balance is 53/47 (F/R); that should be reversed or least closer to 50/50.

Moving the battery back to the boot (as in BMW 3-series) is one trick that would cost very little; moving the transmission back there is another trick that is a bit more expensive but could be very effective. If many of the commenters above have raved about the BRZ's cornering (potential and real) with its current design, imagine what it would feel like with a better weight distribution.

-------------------
** One reviewer said that driving a new Z4 is like the captain of a ship sending a message to the wheelman to change the rudder to move the bow!

Re: Subaru BRZ Premium

1 year 11 weeks ago


josen100x wrote:

A true successor to the Nissan 200sx has been crafted.


Nissan's own 370zx (which seems to have been forgotten a bit in the rush to praise the Toyobaru pair) is far from an untrue successor to the 200sx. Granted it's a lot more powerful, but it's still a great drive and good value.

Re: Subaru BRZ Premium

1 year 11 weeks ago

Overdrive wrote:

Nissan's own 370zx (which seems to have been forgotten a bit in the rush to praise the Toyobaru pair) is far from an untrue successor to the 200sx. Granted it's a lot more powerful, but it's still a great drive and good value.

Yes, but I think that the true game changer was the first generation of it, the 350Z in 2003. At the time it was a performance bargain and a great drive. Not that the 370Z is a bad car but it has improved slightly over the original package while other cars got faster and more focused and I personally think that looks worse.

Re: Subaru BRZ Premium

1 year 11 weeks ago

Autocar wrote:

What is it?

Yet another drive story about the ‘Toyobaru’ sports car. But it’s an important one, so no dozing off at the back.

Last week, Editor-at-large Steve Sutcliffe brought you a report from behind the wheel of a practically finished Toyota GT-86 after a session on track in Spain. This week, it’s Subaru’s turn: we’ve had a day in a final production version of the BRZ – this t...Read the full article

It may drive a little different, but that's not enough,i always think it's pointless for 2 car makers to do their take on a design,it's counter productive,OK, so tuners will work there magic on these cars,which means they will cost more, defeats the purpose of affordable sports car motoring.

Peter Cavellini.

Re: Subaru BRZ Premium

1 year 11 weeks ago

I'm really looking forward to this car coming out and taking it for a test drive. However, even though 0-60 times are generally not a good idea to judge a cars performance I think I would have to wait for the STI model to shop in my Mazda 3 MPS. More fun Im sure it is but It's not often I get to drive it like it should be driven to obtain maximum fun.

Anonymous

Re: Subaru BRZ Premium

1 year 8 weeks ago

The author's comments about weight to horsepower are non sequitur. He notes the Cayman at 330 is not much better. The Cayman R weighs only a bit more than 100 lbs than the Subarota, but with only 167 versus 330 hp, it definitly won't be keeping up with the Porsche any time soon. Playing games with KG vs Lbs is a game best left unplayed.

Please register or login to post a comment.

Our Verdict

The Subaru BRZ 2+2 coupé is the marque's own product from its collaboration with Toyota, which also resulted in the GT86

Driven this week