Matt Prior
8 September 2011

What is it?

It’s the first time we’ve had a steer in the UK in Lamborghini’s fairly sensational Aventador. It’s also the first right-hand-drive version we’ve driven, so I’ll focus a lot on those points.

You’ll probably know much of the rest of the Aventador story by now: it’s the new big Lambo, replacement for the Murcielago and the other mid-engined V12s before it.

But this time the tech is very different: it’s carbon-fibre tubbed, with a mix of composite and aluminium bodywork; while the engine is, this time, all-new: a 6.5-litre naturally aspirated unit, driving all four wheels through a single-clutch automated-manual gearbox.

What’s it like?

Still imposing. Drop yourself across the sill into the driver’s seat and - despite the new all-straights-and-angles interior with its is-it-plastic/is-it-metal surfacing - if you’ve so much as sat in a Murcielago, you’ll know you’re in the new V12 Lamborghini.

You intrinsically feel the bulk behind you, and that you’re at the pointy end of something fairly senior. Visibility is good to the front, so-so to the rear.

The pedals are still massively offset to the left, too. Feel for the brake and you’ll find the throttle instead. Left-foot-braking is the only sensible solution.

The seats are a bit flat, too, but the steering wheel is very adjustable. The flappy paddles are fixed to the column, with the column stalks below them. If you’re tall, you might inadvertently indicate with your knees. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss, etc.

But when you fire it up and all is (mostly) forgiven. All-new engine it might be, but it seemingly has lost none of its character.

Neither, sadly, has the gearshift, which is unrefined compared to a good twin-clutch unit. Oh, likewise the ride, which is good for a big Lamborghini, but fairly ropey by most other standards, including those adopted by McLaren and Ferrari.

There’s no denying this is a big car, too. At 2030mm wide (including mirrors, granted), it is too wide to be particularly enjoyable on anything other than the broadest A-road. And even then it’s too fast.

Still, I suppose if you’re in the market for a car like this, you’ll accept all that: and the real question is, with 690bhp, what’ll it do?

Faintly rearrange your internal organs, is the short answer. I’ve driven nothing this side of a Bugatti Veyron that feels this quick: not a 599 GTO, not an MP4-12C or a GT2 RS. Not even, in its relentlessness, an Atom V8.

In fact, in flat-out mode (there are Strada, Sport and Corsa throttle/gearbox maps), upshift is so brutal that they can make acceleration feel even more spectacular than a Veyron’s. The Bugatti just picks up, goes, and keeps on going. The Aventador punctuates every burst of acceleration with a pause, a duck of the car’s nose, and then another astonishing whack in the back.

And the handling? Friendlier than it was, but it needs a definitive technique to get the best from it. The Aventador corners fast and capably in all cases, but mostly wants to wash out its front wheels first, particularly in slower corners.

To get the back wheels involved in changing the cornering attitude you’ve got to do it on the way into the corner, by getting the (significant) weight behind you moving around. Do that and it’s more willing to engage both ends in the cornering line, but remains, I suppose inevitably given the mass of engine behind, less incisive than its peers.

I’m talking about on a track, of course. On the road, if you extract all of this car’s performance and potential, you’ll end up with the spell in chokey you probably deserve. All supercars are too fast to enjoy on the road.

Should I buy one?

If you’ve got regular access to a lengthy runway, or you live somewhere with wide, flat, long and empty roads, where traffic laws don’t exist or can be circumvented by the simple application of cash, maybe. The Aventador is a hugely effective way of transporting yourself several miles from where you were just a moment ago.

But if you’re after an all-round, complete supercar that’s painless – or even offers some tactile qualities - at road speeds, yet is entertaining on a normal-sized race track, I think you’ll be wanting to look elsewhere.

Lamborghini Aventador

Price: £242,280; 0-62mph: 2.9sec; Top speed: 217mph; Economy: 16.4mpg; CO2: 398g/km; Kerb weight: 1620kg (est, 1575kg dry); Engine: V12, 6498cc, petrol; Power: 690bhp at 8250rpm; Torque: 508lb ft at 5550rpm; Gearbox: 7-speed automated manual

Join the debate

Comments
64

Re: Lamborghini Aventador

1 year 36 weeks ago


Lesia44 wrote:

+1

If you're going to devalue a word it's time to find the right one to make the description clear. In what scale is fairly sensational?

Re: Lamborghini Aventador

1 year 36 weeks ago

Los Angeles wrote:

Something cannot be fairly sensational. It's either thrilling, astounding, incredible, or it is not.

+1

Re: Lamborghini Aventador

1 year 36 weeks ago

Los Angeles wrote:

If you're going to devalue a word it's time to find the right one to make the description clear. In what scale is fairly sensational?

I'm surprised I have to explain this to someone who can clearly write. The word 'fairly' is being used in an ironic (and humorous) way to tell the reader exactly how sensational they think this car is. By using it ironically they are emphasising exactly how sensational they think the Aventador really is. They're not saying it's a little bit sensational or mildly sensational or, indeed, fairly sensational. They're saying it's extremely sensational, and then some.

You know, I do believe that is a 'pec'...

Re: Lamborghini Aventador

1 year 36 weeks ago

Los Angeles wrote:

If you're going to devalue a word it's time to find the right one to make the description clear. In what scale is fairly sensational?

LA - its not a
devaluation - it's a perfectly acceptable colloquialism to use in this context,
who's meaning is well understood and often used. It isn't a contradiction at
all if you use the word Fairly in its alternate meaning of considerably as
opposed to its other meaning of moderately.

None of which is
particularly important or relevant to the road test itself.

Re: Lamborghini Aventador

1 year 36 weeks ago

Los Angeles wrote:

Something cannot be fairly sensational. It's either thrilling, astounding, incredible, or it is not. Bit like saying, the magnificent winner came second, or he ate a mildly delicious dinner.

You've never used the term 'pretty good'? Or 'somewhat alarming'?

'Fairly sensational', used in this context, is clearly intended as breathlessly humorous. There's no motor-enthusiast worth his salt who doesn't get what the author means. Except you, maybe.

Re: Lamborghini Aventador

1 year 36 weeks ago

Lesia - Phil


If you require, as you both have, a long, convoluted paragraph of explanation to interpret the phrase then it has failed to communicate its meaning clearly, precisely, and instantly.

Re: Lamborghini Aventador

1 year 36 weeks ago

Los Angeles wrote:

Lesia - Phil

If you require, as you both have, a long, convoluted paragraph of explanation to interpret the phrase then it has failed to communicate its meaning clearly, precisely, and instantly.

Wrong. Just because one person is a little slow on the up take and needs a walk through to get it doesn't mean the writer failed. As everyone except you got it we can probably chalk that one up as a success.

You know, I do believe that is a 'pec'...

Re: Lamborghini Aventador

1 year 36 weeks ago


kraftwerk wrote:

You've never used the term 'pretty good'? Or 'somewhat alarming'?


The former, yes, the latter, no.


Alarm is a word with precise meaning, good is a general term. Both pretty good and somewhat alarming are just as imprecise as fairly sensational though handy for daily small talk. Here, however, we're analysing a car's strengths not talking about the weather where generality is acceptable. As an opening statement it's fine. Knowing what justifies the fairly is lost.


As I said earlier, even for small talk telling a woman she's almost beautiful is asking for a slap in the face.


Re: Lamborghini Aventador

1 year 36 weeks ago

Los Angeles wrote:

Knowing what justifies the fairly is lost.

On you, obviously.

Re: Lamborghini Aventador

1 year 36 weeks ago

One of the very few proper supercars. Why? Because Lamborghini, unlike Ferrari, still understands that these cars are, inherently, ridiculous, just as much as they are cool and fast.



There is no remotely sensible reason to buy any of these cars, irrespective of wealth.



The whole essence of Lamborghini is that it should make you smile, and this car succeeds entirely in that quest (apart from the tragic absence of a manual gearbox).



Ferrari on the other hand, has become so po-faced, that I would not be surprised to read a warning in one of its manuals saying "Do not smile whilst driving this vehicle as it may distract you from the serious business of driving down the King's Road."

Please register or login to post a comment.

Our Verdict

The Lamborghini Aventador is big, bullish and ballistic, but it isn't perfect

Driven this week