Nic Cackett
1 May 2012

What is it?

The business class 320d. The version we road tested in February is all well and good for the punters, but even as we lavished it with stars, BMW had this, the EfficientDynamics model, gently warming up in the trouser press for its corporate debut.

Despite looking for all the world like a regular 320d (there is no badging to distinguish the car from its stablemate) the ED is in fact a wheeled loophole intended to help its buyers circumvent as much of the government’s company car tax rules as possible.

It does this by playing the now-familiar technical trump card; output from the 2.0-litre diesel engine is reduced to 161bhp from 181bhp, the six-speed manual gearbox’s ratios have been lengthened, internal friction has been further reduced, ancillary power consumption has been revised and, most importantly, smaller 16-inch aerodynamic alloys have been fitter under the arches.

The result is a drop in CO2 emissions from an already impressive 120g/km to a positively tree-hugging 109g/km. Not only does this drop the ED into a lowly 15 per cent tax band under the latest rules, it also ensures that businesses which purchase outright will be able to write off 100 per cent of the cost against tax in the first year.

What’s it like?

Much as you’d expect; a BMW 320d with some of the starch taken out. Fortunately, there was such an excess of starch to begin with that there really isn’t much of a penalty to pay for the ED’s fiscal finesse.

The 20bhp reduction in power means that even in its Sport mode (BMW’s selectable Drive Performance Control comes as standard) there’s a marginal decline in top-end urgency, which translates into a half-a-second deficiency in the 0-62mph sprint.

Nevertheless, that still means that the ED is capable of breaking the tape in an athletic 8.0 seconds, and with the same 280lb ft of torque available from 1750rpm as before, the car very rarely (if ever) feels like a feeble low-emission special.

Indeed, it’s a measure of the model’s class-leading chassis credentials that nudging it into Sport remains a compelling option - one arguably bolstered by the new wheels, which with a more generous profile and no run-flat rubber, offer a further layer of polish to the 3-series’ already exemplary ride quality.

The same gently heightened sense of comfort is noticeable in the car’s default Eco Pro setting, where a remapped throttle and gearshift indicator help stretch the 320d’s claimed fuel economy from 61.4mpg to a best-in-segment 68.9mpg. (To put that in perspective, the VW Passat Bluemotion manages the same return, but only from a 1.6-litre diesel engine with just 104bhp.)

Should I buy one?

Yes, definitely. With unerring accuracy, BMW constructed an ideal (as it stands at the moment among its peers, virtually perfect) machine for fleet managers and tax-shy execs. They’ve even brought it to market at the same price as the 320d SE, and added the eight-speed automatic option which its customer base apparently craved.

However, if your pride and joy is not subject to company car rules, you should pause before jumping on the bandwagon. Certainly the drop in CO2 emissions is going to benefit you too, but only to the tune of £10 a year, and our long-term experience with the standard engine has already proven it capable of 60-plus mpg without the need to deduct any of its potential energy.

If it were our money on the line, we’d pony up an extra tenner for added thrust, prettier wheels and the quiet satisfaction of experiencing one of the decade’s finest at its undiluted best. But that’s just us.

BMW 320d EfficientDynamics

Price: £28,080; 0-62mph: 8.0 seconds; Top speed: 143mph; Economy: 68.9mpg; Co2: 109g/km; Kerbweight: 1490kg; Engine type, cc: 1995cc turbo diesel, four-cylinder; Power: 161bhp; Torque: 280lb ft; Gearbox: Six-speed manual

Read the What Car? verdict: BMW 320d EfficientDynamics

Join the debate

Comments
74

Re: BMW 320d ED

1 year 2 weeks ago

HTTP 404 Not Found when I click on the pictures. Just letting the webmaster know. Interested in seeing it in that colour but can't view them.

Re: BMW 320d ED

1 year 2 weeks ago

The pic page is there but they've got too many "." in the url. Replacing the ..aspx at the end with .aspx makes it display correctly. Debugging for free!!!

Re: BMW 320d ED

1 year 2 weeks ago

I looked at the new 3er several times as I made a decision on my next company car. I really liked the way the car looked in the showroom, the driving position was perfect and the interior was very nice (though the screen on the dash looks silly if you don't have nav). I could have got a really nicely specced 320d ED (leather, electric heated sports seats, metallic, top grade stereo etc etc)... and I was really close to pushing the button on one.


But before I could get a test drive I saw one on the road... and I hardly noticed it... just had no presence at all. I thought it might just be colour sensitive, but after seeing a few more now they all look the same, whatever the colour.


Maybe the M Sport will look better, but the standard models are just soooo bland.


And in 6 months time there will be 1,000's of them on the road.

Re: BMW 320d ED

1 year 2 weeks ago


pah68 wrote:

The pic page is there but they've got too many "." in the url. Replacing the ..aspx at the end with .aspx makes it display correctly. Debugging for free!!!

Thanks, that did actually work.

Re: BMW 320d ED

1 year 2 weeks ago

Shows how much they read the comments, the problem with the pictures link is still there!

Plus, I could be wrong, but I think that's a 328i in the pictures... :0)

Re: BMW 320d ED

1 year 2 weeks ago

Oilburner wrote:

Plus, I could be wrong, but I think that's a 328i in the pictures...

In fairness to Autocar, that does appear to be the 320ed from the look of the alloys.

I'll get my coat.

Re: BMW 320d ED

1 year 2 weeks ago

Nic,

Was this test car fitted with the adaptive dampers? Please advise, as if so this will be the first time anyone in the press has been allowed to drive an F30 with standard suspension. The comments on the ride are welcome but not terribly meaningful unless we know whether it has achieved this without expensive extras.

Re: BMW 320d ED

1 year 2 weeks ago

I agree with you. I loved the pictures and when I saw it in the show room thought it looked great. However having seen some of them on the road I think they look really bland. There is something really wrong about the front of the car. It looks like it sags, or that the headlights are too low. I was thinking about replacing my 3 series but now I am not sure. Disappointing really.

Re: BMW 320d ED

1 year 2 weeks ago

Oilburner wrote:

Shows how much they read the comments, the problem with the pictures link is still there!

Plus, I could be wrong, but I think that's a 328i in the pictures... :0)

Your wrong! :op

Founder and owner of driverscar.co.uk

Re: BMW 320d ED

1 year 2 weeks ago

Fidji wrote:

Don't get me wrong, these figures are very impressive, but I was expecting an improvement over the last one.

+1!! I was realy dissapointed when I saw the stats for the new 3ED, I was exited when they said there would be a new one and Thought It could get even closer to the Prius!

Founder and owner of driverscar.co.uk

Please register or login to post a comment.

Our Verdict

The BMW 3-series' outstanding performance and handling complete a consummate all-rounder

Driven this week