From £47,6258
Lower-end Q7 is as luxurious and well-mannered as any, although still not quite the model to plump for

Our Verdict

The second generation Audi Q7
Audi Q7 is priced from £47,755

New flagship SUV is lighter, smaller and smarter. But is it any better?

  • First Drive

    2016 Audi Q7 e-tron review

    Plug-in hybrid Q7 promises economy of 156.9mpg and BIK rates of 10%. It’ll take you a while to recoup the £10k premium over a standard Q7, though
  • First Drive

    2016 Audi SQ7 review

    Audi's tech-heavy, 429bhp seven-seater shows huge pace, if a less than perfect ride. We’ve driven it in the UK for the first time

What is it?

The entry-level version of the Audi Q7, the second generation of which was introduced to the UK market late last year. With 53bhp and 74lb ft less than its sister model, it’s just under a second slower to 62mph from rest than the 268bhp version – although it’s still a bluff two-tonne SUV capable of topping 130mph itself, and pretty plainly a long way from being underpowered.

Offered in the same SE and S line trim levels and with all of the same equipment and available options, the lower-end Q7 isn’t a car with any less technological sophistication or breadth of ability than its more powerful sibling. And so, given that its gruntier equivalent isn’t exactly a driver’s car either, could this Q7 be the pick of the range?

What's it like?

An outstanding old-school Audi in so many ways, in terms of perceived quality, refinement, comfort, occupant space, on-board technology and remarkable ease of use. Almost all of the ways in which we praised the full-house diesel version last year, then. That said, this is perhaps not the canny buy you might expect it to be.

Even though the car doesn’t have quite the same imperious, immaculately smooth kind of performance as its rangemate, few could complain about how forcefully it gets up the road. The engine feels potent enough when accelerating the car’s mass from town speeds, and the eight-speed automatic gearbox selects its ratios cleverly when overtaking, keeping the tacho’s needle at, or close to, peak torque.

Wind the motor up to 3500rpm and the car’s mask of invincibility slips a bit, the V6 beginning to get breathless in the higher gears. But that’s only ever likely to be a factor when doing the kind of outside-lane motorway speeds for which Audi drivers are becoming notorious. Frankly, they’re speeds that any right-thinking Q7 owner would seldom even approach, such is the readily apparent maturity and refinement of the car’s character and the sweetness of its gait at a relaxed pace.

Equip the Q7 with adaptive air suspension, as came fitted to our test car, and you’ll find its ride indulgently supple in Comfort mode and its cabin isolation top-drawer at all times. Steering is averagely light and isn’t troubled by anything as potentially wearing as contact patch feel, but it’s fluent enough. Body control is respectable, and the car steers faithfully and securely - although it wavers vertically on its springs at higher speeds at times, potentially disturbing passengers if you hurry.

Cycle through the Q7’s more dialled-up drive modes and you’ll realise the folly of your actions quickly enough. The steering’s fluency becomes replaced by unhelpful weight and apparent stickiness and the buoyancy of that ride by a more fidgeting compromise which, while it boosts handling response and heave control a bit, isn’t worth the trade-off. At no time is the Audi actually uncomfortable, nor anything like it, but its dynamic calling card is undoubtedly less compelling while it’s pretending to be ‘sporty’.

The car’s supremely well-constructed interior exudes an aura of integrity and class that can be matched by no other large SUV. Its infotainment and convenience functions are second-to-none, too, and there’s room for even large adults to stretch out in both the first and second rows, with average-sized ones relatively comfortable in row three.

Should I buy one?

Large SUVs don’t get any more suave or luxurious. Assuming comfort, class and impressive 4x4 capability are the ideals to which you want to devote your new SUV, you’re shopping in exactly the right place here.

Well, almost exactly. The fact is, Audi’s lesser Q7 delivers only a very marginal improvement in fuel economy over the higher-powered equivalent, no advantage at all on benefit in kind company car tax and would only be worth a £35 per year saving on road tax to the private buyer.

Given that the difference on showroom price between the lesser and greater diesels is less than £3000 (much of which can likely be offset against stronger residual values for the more in-demand higher-output model), we’d advise that the 268bhp Q7 is the smarter buy. Audi’s customers will likely dress up their cars with several thousand pounds of options, after all. And attempting to offset any of that discretionary spend by scrimping on what’s under the bonnet wouldn’t be advisable.

Location Middlesex; On sale now; Price £51,250; Engine V6, 2967cc, diesel; Power 215bhp; Torque 369lb ft; Gearbox 8-spd automatic; Kerb weight 2060kg; 0-62mph 7.3sec; Top speed 134mph; Economy 48.7mpg (combined); CO2/tax band 150g/km, 28%

Join the debate

Comments
15

21 January 2016

Pig ugly, arent these things supposed to evolve and get more attractive over time - YUK

21 January 2016
lambo1 wrote:

Pig ugly, arent these things supposed to evolve and get more attractive over time - YUK

which SUV's would you consider attractive? The BMW X5? Cayenne? Volvo? I don't think so.

21 January 2016

Looks more VW'ish

Bit of a contradiction in the review as you say you wouldn't bother with the lower powered version, yet it still gets up the road pretty quickly and its not in anyway a sport vehicle so isn't having the more powerful one pointless and just likely to encourage someone to overcook beyond the car's handling ability too easily? Be better to save a few mpg, and travel safely. The £3K difference will save a few quid as 99% of these will be company cars on a lease.

21 January 2016

Looks more VW'ish

Bit of a contradiction in the review as you say you wouldn't bother with the lower powered version, yet it still gets up the road pretty quickly and its not in anyway a sport vehicle so isn't having the more powerful one pointless and just likely to encourage someone to overcook beyond the car's handling ability too easily? Be better to save a few mpg, and travel safely. The £3K difference will save a few quid a month as 99% of these will be company cars on a lease.

21 January 2016

is very good technology ,,,
performapasutri.com

tlb

22 January 2016

Often with the lower powered engines you end up getting poorer real world economy because you have to work the car harder. So as suggested it's pretty much a no brainer to go for the more powerful version as it's going to be more fun and cheaper to run.

Having seen a couple of these on the road I think they look quite purposeful.

22 January 2016

If people can see past their aversion to Audi they've actually produced a decent car here. Left to its own devices in basic comfort settings and not trying to be something it's not this would be a satisfying way to cruise around.


22 January 2016

I hate paying for the extras they do this for mugs thinking that the depreciation is very good, for getting the extras cost , better to get a Range Rover Sport which will inreality hold its value far betteras even metalic paint and heated seats are included along witrh leather dab and on and on it goes.

22 January 2016
Ski Kid wrote:

I hate paying for the extras they do this for mugs thinking that the depreciation is very good, for getting the extras cost , better to get a Range Rover Sport which will inreality hold its value far betteras even metalic paint and heated seats are included along witrh leather dab and on and on it goes.

You could get a RR Sport, but then you'd look a complete twat and have to spend at least another 20k to look a twat, and you'd have to deal with LR dealers, who are twats.

22 January 2016

meant £10000 on extras

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka
  •  Maserati Ghibli Diesel
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    Maserati releases another range of updates for its range best seller, the Ghibli. We've driven the diesel version, but there's little improvement on before
  • Tipo Front
    First Drive
    21 September 2016
    New Fiat Tipo offers impressive space and practicality for a reasonable price. We try the 1.6 diesel on the demanding roads of North Wales
  • Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150
    First Drive
    20 September 2016
    The Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150 makes perfect sense: it's spacious, tidy to drive for an SUV and cheap to run