From £25,6658
Classy new A4 Avant has plenty going for it, but rivals remain better to drive

Our Verdict

The 2015 Audi A4

All-new Audi A4 saloon zeroes in on efficiency, technology and quality

  • First Drive

    2016 Audi A4 Allroad 3.0 TDI quattro 272 review

    The most potent Audi A4 Allroad has plenty of punch, but its lesser engine options make more sense to us
  • First Drive

    2016 Audi S4 review

    New Audi S4 keeps things reserved in the looks department, but packs a 349bhp turbocharged V6 petrol punch. We've driven an early car abroad
4 February 2016

What is it?

A new Audi A4 saloon reached the UK last year, so now begins the inevitable roll-out of the rest of the family's bodystyles. Up first, and tested here, is the new A4 Avant (the estate, lest you forget), which will in time be followed by (deep breath) an A4 Allroad version, an A5 coupé, A5 Cabriolet, A5 Sportback and probably some other niche that a bloke in marketing thought up. Can we not just skip to the RS4?

I digress. The engine range of the A4 Avant mirrors that of the saloon, meaning four-cylinder petrols are offered alongside four and six-cylinder diesels, with front and quattro all-wheel drive and six-speed manual and seven-speed S tronic dual-clutch automatic transmissions.

We’ve picked quite an interesting combination here to test: the 187bhp version of the 2.0 TFSI petrol engine mated to a seven-speed automatic gearbox driving the front wheels. Diesels will, of course, be the main sellers, but we liked the smooth power delivery of the petrol when we tested it previously, and the auto is well suited to life in the outside lane of British motorways.

But of more importance here are those vital estate statistics. The boot space is rated at 505 litres, rising to 1510 litres when the standard 40/20/40 split rear seats are folded. The smaller boot volume figure eclipses both the BMW 3 Series Touring and Mercedes-Benz C-Class Estate, while the C-Class Estate is a match for the A4 Avant seats down.

What's it like?

We have to start with that interior. Even though we’ve seen it before in the saloon, the cabin of the A4 is still a thing no rival can match. The perceived quality is as good as we’ve ever seen in the class, the layout intuitive and the MMI rotary controller and buttons for the infotainment system far preferable things to use than a touchscreen, not to mention feeling more premium.

The optional Virtual Cockpit digital display is also the best instrument panel in the class, and smartphone-friendly features such as Apple CarPlay and a wireless charging mat are handy tools for the mobile office.

The driving position is also excellent, as is all-round visibility and seat comfort, and as an estate the A4 Avant is as practical as anything in the class. Its large boot has a wide entry and a low, flat loading lip, and the standard powered tailgate makes access a doddle.

The interior puts you in a good mood before you drive the car, and it’s well suited to a life on the road for comfort and convenience. It’s a shame, then, that the A4 Avant doesn’t shine so brightly when it comes to driving it.

What must be said is that the A4 Avant is a good deal better to drive than the model it replaces. However, it still falls short of the dynamic verve of the BMW 3 Series Touring. The ride is definitely better than that of the old A4 Avant and more supple and less susceptible to crashing over broken surfaces. However, it never quite feels as at one with the road as you do in a 3 Series.

The handling slips into the same category. It corners well enough and steers okay, but there’s no real depth. It drives in the sort of way it thinks you want it to, without you ever really knowing what it’s up to. It’s all a bit artificial, in other words. 

As for the engine, the 2.0-litre petrol unit is a nice match for the A4. It lacks the bottom end of a torquey diesel but likes to be revved, making this a brisk car when on the move. It also presents a nice growl in Sport mode under harder acceleration.

The gearbox is smooth enough, if a little slow to react on step-off. It performs its best work when shifted into Sport mode, in which gearchanges are being more decisive and precise. It also slips out of gear occasionally to coast and save fuel - something you'd hardly notice if the selected gear number didn’t disappear from the digital dashboard.

The A4 is at its best when churning out the motorway miles. However, even while on the motorway the economy of this petrol A4version is never that impressive. We didn’t manage to average anything better than 35mpg despite extensive motorway running. For many, this will blunt the appeal of the engine, which is a shame as Its performance is otherwise pleasing.

Should I buy one?

The A4 Avant ticks many of the boxes the executive estate buyer will have jotted down in his or her mental notepad. It has a class-leading interior, great infotainment, a comfortable ride and, most importantly, a competitively spacious and practical boot. However, show-stopping cabin or not, the A4 remains short of its rivals dynamically.

Ultimately, it’s good to drive, but good to drive will only get you so far in an estate class containing the BMW 3 Series Touring, which remains our class-leader.

2016 Audi A4 Avant 2.0 TFSI S line

Location Norfolk; On sale now; Price £32,395; Price as tested £41,875; Engine 4 cyls, 1984cc, turbocharged, petrol; Power 187bhp at 4200-6000rpm; Torque 236lb ft at 1450-4200rpm; Gearbox 7-spd dual-clutch automatic; Kerb weight 1480kg; 0-62mph 7.5sec; Top speed 148mph; Economy 52.3mpg (combined); CO2/tax band: 124g/km, 19%

 

Join the debate

Comments
18

5 February 2016

...perfectly describes both the car and its natural habitat. Well done, Mark!

5 February 2016

CO2 is pretty impressive for quite a big car with a powerful petrol auto.

5 February 2016
The Apprentice wrote:

CO2 is pretty impressive for quite a big car with a powerful petrol auto.

A nice car but the Co2 figure will increase significantly once we get a more realistic testing regime on emissions.

5 February 2016

35mpg isn't that great, but the equivalent diesel probably won't do much better than low 40s in the real world, will cost more to buy and will emit lots more nasty poison into the air. I think this is a well-judged car - not exciting in any way, but comfortable, practical and designed to make its occupants feel good. Nothing wrong with that.

5 February 2016

Wow, that's a truly immense price for an A4 that's nowhere near the top of the tree in the range.

I had a 2.0TDI A4 Avant S Line maybe five years ago that listed at £29k but was bought for I think £25k.

5 February 2016

£9,500 of options is what makes it a £42,000 car. Not sure what that £9,500 has bought, though!

5 February 2016

Impressive car on the whole but let down by some annoying lapses.
Trying to input a destination on the screen now requires the patience of a saint and forget about doing it through the voice recognition system because that doesn't work. Where it took 1 minute max in the old A4 it now can take 10x longer; very frustrating.
They've moved the side mirrors from the base of the A pillar to the top of the door panel to create a lower drag. All very well but now in heavy rain, at above 50mph, water streams all over the front windows blurring almost completely the mirrors, the driver's side being the worst.
Finally some very expensive options which should be standard and the crashy ride that Autocar mentioned but I found this coming mainly from the rear axle. (same problem in the A6)

TS7

5 February 2016

£42K?!?!

6 February 2016

you realise a 2.0 Ecoboost 240bhp Mondeo Vignale auto estate, fully loaded is £10k cheaper, is a badge really worth that much? Both are big front wheel drive estates, but one just happens to ride more soflty (autocar hate that about the new Mondeo), and one is an overpriced Skoda.

6 February 2016
Citytiger wrote:

you realise a 2.0 Ecoboost 240bhp Mondeo Vignale auto estate, fully loaded is £10k cheaper, is a badge really worth that much? Both are big front wheel drive estates, but one just happens to ride more soflty (autocar hate that about the new Mondeo), and one is an overpriced Skoda.

The Mondeo is slower and is way behind on the combined mpg front, just 37.7mpg and 174g/km of CO2, so it's more than a badge. Also, the 2.0 Ecoboost Mondeo is listed around £32,000 on the Ford website before extras, only £400 less than the Audi in Standard S line spec. No one spends £10,000 on extras

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka
  •  Maserati Ghibli Diesel
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    Maserati releases another range of updates for its range best seller, the Ghibli. We've driven the diesel version, but there's little improvement on before
  • Tipo Front
    First Drive
    21 September 2016
    New Fiat Tipo offers impressive space and practicality for a reasonable price. We try the 1.6 diesel on the demanding roads of North Wales