What is it?

It's the new Alpina B5 Biturbo, the latest creation from the BMW-based manufacturer and the first chance we’ve had to sample a 'performance' version of the new 5-series.

Recent Alpinas have avoided using the same engines as M division products, but the B5 will come pretty close to going head to head with the forthcoming M5. It shares the same basic 4.4-litre V8 engine (the inlet set-up is different), equipped with two retuned turbochargers.

In Alpina tune the unit produces a flat 500bhp and 516lb ft. That's enough, says the firm, to take the car from 0-62mph in 4.7sec and onto a gloriously unrestricted 191mph.

Unlike the M5, which is likely to use a dual-clutch transmission, the B5 gets an eight-speed automatic. But the unit has been developed by Alpina and ZF, and it uses a trick way of speeding up shifts when you're in one of the car's sportier modes.

Instead of merely retarding the engine timing, the B5 uses its direct injection tech to merely cut off a cylinder or two. Alpina says the system cuts gearshift times in two, to around 180ms.

What's it like?

Jaw-droppingly fast. We drove the B5 from Alpina's base in Buchloe to the UK - in time for its appearance at the Goodwood Festival of Speed - and with an empty stretch of autobahn in front of it, it's supercar quick.

Alpina's claim of 0-62mph in 4.7sec feels conservative - and as for the top speed, well, we saw an indicated 190mph with three and their luggage aboard, and it was still pulling strongly.

Truth is, though, that making a 5-series with this engine feel strong on a motorway was never going to be the biggest challenge faced by Alpina's engineers. More testing is the task of making it handle on poor surfaces and twisty roads, and here the firm's modifications - lower suspension, non-runflat tyres and comprehensive reprogramming of BMW's adjustable dampers - pays off.

We wouldn't say the B5 has precisely the same level of agility and subtlety as Jaguar's XFR - but it's not far off it at all, and that means it's very good indeed. Revised steering programming makes the wheel feel lighter at low speeds than a 5-series, and weightier when you're pushing on, and it's a more satisfying set-up than BMW's.

With the car in Sport or Sport+ set-up the ride is firm but still compliant (no runflats, remember, just Michelin Pilot Sport 2s, or Pilot Super Sports on the final cars) and body control is excellent.

That trick transmission works well, too; we can't think of many dual-clutch units that beat it on speed and smoothness. The engine has massive urge from beneath 2000rpm, and if you push on it makes a great Nascar-esque soundtrack. It's perfectly docile for everyday use, though; cruise along at 80mph (barely 1900rpm) and it's silent.

Should I buy one?

At around £70k, the B5 will sit above the Jaguar XFR on price, but beat it hands down on exclusivity. Even our car - production prototype number one - was beautifully finished, the spec is relatively generous by BMW standards and Alpina can also offer a personal service matched by no mass manufacturer.

Of course, you could be tempted to wait for the M5, which will offer a more hardcore experience but, almost inevitably, more compromises on ride quality to boot. But if you're more sold on a 5-series than an XF, we'd be sorely tempted to put down a deposit now. Even by Alpina's relatively high standards, this is the firm's most complete package ever.

John McIlroy

Join the debate

Comments
32

Re: Alpina B5

2 years 46 weeks ago


Autocar wrote:

..We wouldn't say the B5 has precisely the same level of agility and subtlety as Jaguar's XFR ...



Heaven forbid, of course not! If Autocar did that, it'd be the day hell froze over.

Re: Alpina B5

2 years 46 weeks ago

Heaven forbid, of course not! If someone didn't comment on a comparison like this, it'd be the day hell froze over.

The XFR is our benchmark for agility in big super-saloons. Part of the aim of a review is to put a car in context. Hence the comparison - and I stick by it. Sorry it's not what you wanted to read...

Actually, as a whole package, the Alpina is terrific. Could quite understand why people will find the modest amount of extra cash over some mainstream rivals to buy it.

John

Re: Alpina B5

2 years 46 weeks ago


John McIlroy wrote:

The XFR is our benchmark for agility in big super-saloons


I;ve always thought the E60 M5 is more agile on the track than the XFR but more rounded because of its superior ride. anyway both are lovely cars but am doubly impressed by this review. Must be a really good car and shows how BMW should get out onto Real roads and hone supesnion settings rather than simulating them on their laptops. Am really upset by the new 5 series dybamics. (at least from what i've read as i have not driven one).

Re: Alpina B5

2 years 46 weeks ago

I also thought that run flats will not be standard on new BM models are they all u can get on this car?

Re: Alpina B5

2 years 46 weeks ago

Lupe,

Runflats are standard on the 5-series. But Alpina has never used them. That's why, for example, a D3 rides better on 19in wheels than many a regular 3-series on 18s...

John

Re: Alpina B5

2 years 46 weeks ago


John McIlroy wrote:

Lupe,


Runflats are standard on the 5-series. But Alpina has never used them. That's why, for example, a D3 rides better on 19in wheels than many a regular 3-series on 18s...


John



Its a shame, i really do wonder why BMw insist on using them and they clearly have no single advantage.

Re: Alpina B5

2 years 46 weeks ago

John McIlroy wrote:

Heaven forbid, of course not! If someone didn't comment on a comparison like this, it'd be the day hell froze over.

The XFR is our benchmark for agility in big super-saloons. Part of the aim of a review is tolo put a car in context. Hence the comparison - and I stick by it. Sorry it's not what you wanted to read...

Actually, as a whole package, the Alpina is terrific. Could quite understand why people will find the modest amount of extra cash over some mainstream rivals to buy it.

John

Sorry some comments might not automatically concur with you fellows' views, John. Of course you (like everyone else) are perfectly entitled to express yours as you see them.

<-p>

But here's a case of two sport saloons, both with high capabilities (and presumably close to each other) and you've already decided that, in a critical area to such cars, one is better than the other, without first bothering to test them back to back! So, l feel I'm titled to my cynicism here.

Re: Alpina B5

2 years 46 weeks ago

Jag XFR should be your benchmark for the lowest agility out of all sports sedans as many American reviews or comparisons show:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5r2_EAoNR8

I can post multiple sources if you insist.

Re: Alpina B5

2 years 46 weeks ago

Overdrive wrote:

Sorry some comments might not automatically concur with you fellows' views, John. Of course you (like everyone else) are perfectly entitled to express yours as you see them.

But here's a case of two sport saloons, both with high capabilities (and presumably close to each other) and you've already decided that, in a critical area to such cars, one is better than the other, without first bothering to test them back to back! So, l feel I'm titled to my cynicism here.

Yes, I have 'already' decided - having driven both cars, including on UK roads - that while the Alpina is close to matching the XFR's fluidity, it doesn't quite match it. Yes, it is a critical area. Yes, I did think about it carefully before committing it both to the website and in print. Yes, I did decide this after having driven the Alpina, and not before. Would you rather I'd singularly failed to put the car in context at all?

You can make your own judgment on the matter on the forum, though, presumably without having 'bothered' to have driven both cars, or perhaps even either of them. Lucky chap! Must be a tough one! Smile

John

Re: Alpina B5

2 years 46 weeks ago

E

John McIlroy wrote:

Would you rather I'd singularly failed to put the car in context at all?

Not at all, but I WOULD expect to see "back to back" and "direct" comarison on the same roads and under the exact same conditions between two cars, which according to yourself, are close in ability, before passing definitive judgment and taking exception to anyone questioning that judgment.

John McIlroy wrote:

You can make your own judgment on the matter on the forum, though, presumably without having 'bothered' to have driven both cars, though, or perhaps even either of them. Lucky chap! Must be a tough one! Smile

John

Oh very good, John, so the line of argument is "I've driven these cars and you haven't, so just shut the hell up", is that it?

Well, first I didn't make any judgement as to which is the better car. I merely questioned the basis on which you did. Second, of course we mere peasants don't have the luxury and the opportunities of driving great cars like these and that's why we spend are hard earned pennies on publications such as yours Would you rather if we didn't?

Please register or login to post a comment.

Our Verdict

The Alpina B5 is very quick, but it is let down by uninvolving driving dynamics

  • First Drive

    Alpina B5 Biturbo Touring

    There’s nothing quite like a B5 Touring when it comes to trans-continental mile-munching
  • First Drive

    Alpina B5 Biturbo

    Relaxed, shockingly rapid cruiser, but there’s no getting away from its size and heaviness

Driven this week