Currently reading: Drink-drive limit could be lowered in UK
England and Wales could follow Scotland by introducing a 50mg/100ml drink driving limit, Ministers have hinted

The UK government could slash the drink-driving limit in England and Wales, making it illegal to drive after one pint of beer or a glass of wine.

Transport Minister Andrew Jones has suggested that England and Wales could follow the example set by Scotland, which lowered its drink-driving limit from 80mg per 100ml of blood to 50mg in 2014.

It is understood that the rest of the UK could follow Scotland’s lead, with Jones saying he will seek “robust evidence” of the impact of the lower limit.

In response to a parliamentary question asked earlier this month, Jones said he would meet and discuss the matter with his Scottish counterpart: “It is important to base our decisions on evidence and the Scottish experience will be crucial to that before we consider any possible changes to the limits in England and Wales.

“This Government’s current position, however, remains to focus resources on enforcing against the most serious offenders.”

Police in Scotland have said that the number of drink-driving offences fell by 12.5% in the first nine months of its new limit being enforced.

In 2014, drink-driving led to 240 fatalities and 1080 serious injuries in England and Wales.

The current 80mg limit is among the highest in Europe. Countries including the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia have a blanket zero alcohol policy, while the majority of countries have limits of around 50mg per 100ml.

Although the new limits would suggest a single pint of beer or glass of wine would place drivers over the limit, in practice it is impossible to predict, because each person metabolises alcohol at a different rate.

Reaction to the news has been positive. The RAC Foundation’s director, Steve Gooding, said that ministers were “right to remain open minded about drink-drive limits and ready to assess evidence from north of the border.

“It would be a poor argument to say cut the drink-drive limit just because others have done it, but there is now plenty of data to suggest a change would have a marked improvement in terms of road safety.”

The RAC Foundation’s own research estimates that a lower drink-driving limit would save around 25 lives annually. Since 1979, the number of people killed in drink-driving accidents has dropped by around 85%.

Speaking to The Telegraph, AA president, Edmund King, said that a majority of his organisation’s members would support a lower limit. He said the move “seems a sensible step to bring us into line with Scotland and the majority of European countries.

"However, it would probably be more effective for the police to target hard-core offenders, who are way over the current limit, as they are involved in the most deaths and injuries on the road.

Advertisement

Latest business news

Fiat Scudo Ellesmere Port
Stellantis builds vans in Luton and Cheshire, which Tavares says should count towards its ZEV quota
Stellantis CEO: Terrible ZEV mandate will kill UK car industry
Mini Oxford production line
Oxford will produce only combustion-engined versions of the new Mini Cooper until 2026
UK car production falls amid several model changeovers
1.Ford Otosan Yeniköy drone
Last year Ford Otosan made a profit of the equivalent of £1.1 billion
Inside Ford’s Turkish goldmine: home of the Transit
Back to top

"With a lower limit, drivers will also have to be aware of being over the limit the morning after. Our research shows that almost 20% of drivers have driven the morning after when they believed they could be over the limit."

Join the debate

Comments
12
Add a comment…
Andrew 61 12 February 2016

The Scottish experiment.

Regarding the affects in Scotland, the number that appears to have been plucked from available statistics, to justify implementation, is a 12% reduction in drivers testing over the new limit. What has not been shown is a 12% reduction in accidents or deaths resulting from drink driving ? so I am assuming there has been no such reduction ? If this is the case there can be no statistical reason for continuing with this policy ? I would also like to now if the reduction in local economic activity, due to oil companies cutting back on jobs, has contributed to reduced detection rates.
bomb 11 February 2016

There seems to be a different

There seems to be a different culture in policing drink driving between England and Scotland. I live in England and on new year's day some local roads had patrols pulling out random cars for breath testing. And that's the only day you'll ever see that happen. In Scotland, according to family who live there, it's a regular occurrence in theirs and other towns local to them. It's just more strictly enforced more of the time.

With traffic police numbers reduced by a third over the past 5 years I can't see that you're any more likely to get caught than before in England. The only time you're likely to get done is if you're breathalysed after doing something else and not just randomly stopped, as is the case in Scotland.

superstevie 11 February 2016

It has been lowered in

It has been lowered in Scotland for about a year and a half. Its like the smoking ban. At first, there is outrage/discussions/worries about the effects of what will happen. Now, it is just accepted as the norm. It will be the same in England & Wales if it were to happen