Currently reading: Bernie Ecclestone: what F1 legacy does he leave behind?
We look back at Ecclestone's achievements and controversies in motorsport

Bernie Ecclestone was never going to leave Formula 1 gracefully, so he had to be nudged towards the door marked Exit.

Bernie Ecclestone: should we love him or hate him?

That was his character and, even at 86, he was still motivated, even if he probably should have gone sooner. He had no real desire to change. He wanted to go on doing deals, as he has always done.

It was not about the money – that was just the way of keeping score. It was about getting someone to agree to what he wanted. It was all about winning, and Ecclestone always needed to win.

The only question to him was the scale of the victory. With F1, he had something people wanted, so he was able to squeeze them, to make them pay more than they were willing to pay. Call it greed if you like, but really it was about power.

Bernie web 2214

He was funny, charming and ruthless. Utterly ruthless. He was a car dealer to the core, a genius at spotting people’s weaknesses and using them to his advantage. He understood greed and ambition and recognised the dangerous people and made them his friends, although he has few real friends. He could wrap naïve journalists around his little finger by tickling their ego, making them feel that he was their best buddy, but he was a user. For a journalist, he always had a headline, but a lot of them were simply not true. He was just playing, keeping F1 in the newspapers, being outrageous for the sake of it. Sometimes he said things simply to see if people would challenge him.

There was a good side too, but it was well hidden. He didn’t want people to see that too often, because to him this was a weakness.

What Ecclestone did for F1 was impressive, but how he won control of the commercial side of the sport was not. Juggling companies and contracts, he stripped his fellow members of the Formula One Constructors’ Association (FOCA) of the rights they had won together and then presented them with a fait accompli. At one famous FOCA meeting, Ken Tyrrell had to be restrained from strangling Ecclestone when it emerged what he had done. Ecclestone saw it as their fault for not stopping him. Without him, they probably would not have become as wealthy as they did, because they could never agree. He understood this and made it happen.

Advertisement

Latest business news

Fiat Scudo Ellesmere Port
Stellantis builds vans in Luton and Cheshire, which Tavares says should count towards its ZEV quota
Stellantis CEO: Terrible ZEV mandate will kill UK car industry
Mini Oxford production line
Oxford will produce only combustion-engined versions of the new Mini Cooper until 2026
UK car production falls amid several model changeovers
1.Ford Otosan Yeniköy drone
Last year Ford Otosan made a profit of the equivalent of £1.1 billion
Inside Ford’s Turkish goldmine: home of the Transit

Read our review

Car review

Can the turbocharged successor to the 458 raise the bar again, or have upstarts like the McLaren 650S and Honda NSX beaten it to the punch?

Back to top

In Max Mosley, fellow Formula 1 team owner, FOCA lawyer and later FIA president, he saw a kindred spirit and made sure that they were on the same side as much as possible. Ecclestone listened to smart people, but he didn’t often see the value of anything that didn’t pay up front. If you wanted something from him, you had to pay for it and you had to pay big.

There was rarely investment in the business, and when there was, it often didn’t work. Early attempts at digital TV and an escapade in publishing both lost him a lot of money, although it was nothing compared with the £60m he had to pay to stop his infamous bribery trial in Germany in 2014.

Along the way, one got the impression that he lost his love for the sport and that it became a Monopoly board, but the passion was still there somewhere. He loved and admired drivers and they felt that. He hated stuffy men in blazers but enjoyed dealing with cavaliers like Ron Walker, promoter of the Australian Grand Prix. His passion for Russian president Vladimir Putin showed just how much Ecclestone liked power and the powerful.

Bernie web 2215

Without his attention to detail and micro-management, the sport would not have been as successful as it is, but now and then he did not see the bigger picture.

Or he did not care. He let the sport fall into the hands of the private equity people at CVC, who stripped out money at an alarming rate and put nothing back. It suited him. They left him alone to play his games. The sport suffered from that.

Back to top

The huge enterprise that Ecclestone created will go on, but much will change. Liberty Media is preaching co-operation, and there is logic in that. The plan is to move the sport forward by working together.

There will be battles ahead, particularly over revenue splits and budget caps, but the aim now is growth from working together and developing new ideas.

The motive is still profit, but Liberty is a very different animal from CVC and the result should be an improvement. Ecclestone did what he liked doing and ignored the rest. If people paid him enough, he let them try new ideas. Now F1 can start to innovate more.

Joe Saward

Join the debate

Comments
6
Add a comment…
TS7 12 February 2017

I lost interest...

...when the 2.4l V8s arrived. They were just a noise, nothing soulful or interesting, just a noise. I like the V6 turbos (1.6l by the way ski kid), it's just that they should be cheaper for the independent teams to purchase.
Cobnapint 11 February 2017

You get one of the best things about F1 -

The sound of a screaming V8. Then you take it away.
Symanski 11 February 2017

Ken Tryrrell said...

Along the lines that he's made a fortune selling F1, which is amazing considering he didn't own it.
.
He has presided over F1 whilst it's gone from cars built in a woodshed to one of the most technologically advanced in the world. Not all his work, but he's allowed people to spend and spend whatever they like whilst taking his cut. And who wouldn't?
.
As for the state F1 is in today, blame the FIA for not foreseeing a dominant engine would rein for three seasons. I predicted it; that's how obvious that was! And neglect for not moving to fix the problem too.
koyaanisqatsi 11 February 2017

…….

Symanski wrote:

Along the lines that he's made a fortune selling F1, which is amazing considering he didn't own it.
.
He has presided over F1 whilst it's gone from cars built in a woodshed to one of the most technologically advanced in the world. Not all his work, but he's allowed people to spend and spend whatever they like whilst taking his cut. And who wouldn't?
.
As for the state F1 is in today, blame the FIA for not foreseeing a dominant engine would rein for three seasons. I predicted it; that's how obvious that was! And neglect for not moving to fix the problem too.

I knew you were gonna say that…….