Jaguar says an Evoque-style 4x4 is under evaluation for 2016, alongside a 3-series rival

Jaguar is promising “breakthrough” design and engineering for a proposed new crossover. If it’s signed off for production, it could go on sale around 2016 to crown a radical overhaul of its complete model range.

Speaking bullishly at the Geneva motor show, Jaguar global brand director Adrian Hallmark confirmed that the British marque was responding to Jaguar Land Rover CEO Ralf Speth’s wish to “drive breakthroughs in product development”.

Sister firm Land Rover is enjoying unprecedented success with niche-busting products such as the Range Rover Evoque, and Jaguar has been given full licence to break away from its traditional roots to launch some innovative new models, following the announcement by parent firm Tata that it is doubling annual investment in the pair to £1.5 billion.

New model blitz

The new crossover will be preceded by production versions of the C-X16 and C-X75 sports cars and Jaguar’s new BMW 3-series rivalling compact saloon, tentatively due in 2015.

But first, over the next two years, Jaguar plans to launch six other significant new products - either facelifts, new powertrains or new models. “You get your image right first and then put the right engines in the current cars,” said Hallmark. “That’s the best way for us to go over the next two years. Then we can enhance our image further with the sports cars and look at how we can further accelerate our growth with new products.”

Insiders say the focus of Jaguar’s long-term development is the compact saloon. The go-ahead for it from Tata in the near future is a strong possibility.

The crossover, meanwhile, is described by Hallmark as “not the top priority, and not the last either”. Its production chances are believed to be about 50/50, but such a car would fuel Jaguar’s growth in Brazil, Russia, India and China. Hallmark said: “It would give us more geographical growth.”

Three options open

Jaguar could attack the SUV market in a number of ways. Making it a variant of the compact saloon is the most intriguing option, and also perhaps the most feasible. This saloon is likely to be an all-aluminium model, emphasising technology in a market defined by relatively conventional steel cars.

On the 3-series rival, Hallmark said Jaguar “can offer a different proposition that costs more but is worth the extra outlay”.

An all-aluminium SUV spin-off model would be another way of giving Jaguar the uniqueness it needs to define itself against Audi, BMW and Mercedes rivals.

This platform is believed to be a modified and shortened version of the new modular aluminium ‘Premium Lightweight Architecture’ that JLR has developed to underpin its future larger models, including the imminent new Range Rover and, in the longer term, the next-generation XF and XJ saloons. Using the compact saloon as a base for the Jaguar crossover will also allow low-slung proportions.

A second option is forJaguar to leverage the Range Rover Evoque platform and build a compact, fuel-efficient, crossover. A front-wheel-drive crossover is likely to be considered more acceptable than a Jaguar saloon with the same layout. Such a model would also help to reduce Jaguar’s corporate average fuel economy figures.

One less likely alternative is a move upmarket, with a full-size SUV based on the upcoming 4x4 transmission being planned for the XF and XJ. But an SUV based on the XF’s steel architecture is unlikely because the XF’s life will be drawing to a close as the new SUV is due to arrive.

“We have full kit in the group to do what we want to do,” said Hallmark. “We dominate the SUV segment [with Land Rover] and we have an iconic SUV, so we don’t need it as Jaguar Land Rover, the company. But as Jaguar, we need to do something.”

Whatever base is chosen, the design will borrow heavily on the crisper lines and more aggressive flourishes from the C-X16 sports car and it will sport a radical body.

Join the debate

Comments
22

21 March 2012

Is the "Crossover" picture from Jaguar, or an Autocar rendering? It's horrible wherever its from - bastardised Cayenne front end.

21 March 2012

Have to own up to really liking the look of the "Crossover", though I agree that it has elements of the Cayenne to it. I also think it looks a bit like the A3 at the back end.

I would never buy something like this but I would be a happy man if Jag restricted their SUV antics to this rather than a full-size 4x4.

Did anybody else think that the C-X16 looks very similar to the Maserati Granturismo in the photos attached to this article?

21 March 2012

Although Jaguar have plans for such a model & many others, I doubt it will look like the Autocar image.

21 March 2012

Agree with both previous forum members. This looks like a crossover of the worst parts of an A3, Cayenne and Maserati...


21 March 2012

[quote Tom Chet]Have to own up to really liking the look of the "Crossover", [/quote]

Dare I say it, me too. I hate the Cayenne, which looks like this, but I actually quite like the look of this, even if it is just a rendering.

21 March 2012

I think it looks really well, a lot like the Maserati Kubang drawing.

21 March 2012

Yet more sketches, renderings and 'exciting plans' from Jaguar destined to maybe hit the production line several years away - by which time the rest of the game will probably have moved on.

21 March 2012

This is good news. They need to look at what people want, rather than just going through the motions of updating what they already make. Nissan made a big breakthough when the effectively replaced the Primera and Almera with the Qashqai and Juke - good, well executed designs, in niches with less competition. Jaguar will have a (not insurmountable) struggle to compete head-on with Merc and BMW, but if it can carve out a few niches, and create a unique identity, this will pay off.

21 March 2012

[quote lonegoose]Yet more sketches, renderings and 'exciting plans' from Jaguar destined to maybe hit the production line several years away - by which time the rest of the game will probably have moved on. [/quote]

Couldn't agree more. Whether we agree with their choice of sector or the appearance of the end product this is the sort of vehicle Jaguar needs to be releasing now, not in 4 years. Minimum.

I hate critisising sketches and concepts but this one is particularly ungraceful, just looks like a fat hatch. If the finished car ever appears hopefully it'll be better than this.


21 March 2012

I've said on here before that Jaguar should do a proper SUV / Crossover. There's no reason why they couldn't.

Firstly, it must be 4wd. If you look at the snowbelt region of the US you'll understand why.

Secondly, it must be 2wd! Just for Europe with one of those dirty oil burning engines. Horrible.

Thirdly, it mustn't try to be an off road vehicle. Concentrate on Jaguar style in a different package and nothing else.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week