Wed
Jun 03 2009

Why isn't my living room more like an S-class?

Vicky Parrott
You may have read our first drive of the new S-class, and been amazed at the array of new safety gadgets. What the word count prevented me from talking about was something called ‘Splitview’ technology. 

Sounds like a very clever and almost entirely pointless gimmick? That’s what I thought initially, but seeing it is something altogether more impressive.



Splitview allows the passenger to listen and watch something different to the driver on the same infotainment screen. The high-definition picture is sharp and fuzz-free from both angles, and it is truly surreal to find that as a passenger you can watch a movie on the same screen that is displaying the sat-nav and playing the radio for the driver.

Read Autocar's verdict on the new S-class S350 CDI

Even the controls are separate. The passenger gets a remote control that, when set to split-screen mode, will only control their view of the screen so they can’t inadvertently change the sat-nav destination whilst searching for the BBC news.

So the technology works brilliantly and has enough wow factor that it should sell well despite a price tag that is yet to be confirmed but will undoubtedly be four figures long. Yet is this really something that will get used in a car for anything other than showing off to your friends? I doubt it.
 
However, if the same technology could work on a bigger scale – say a 42-inch screen – then the potential is clear. This means I could be watching Desperate Housewives on my high-def TV from the comfort of my sofa whilst my boyfriend plays Grand Theft Auto on the X-Box on the same screen (he’ll get the armchair and the headphones, obviously).

Now that sounds like technology worth investing in. Shares anyone?

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Vicky Parrott

Started as a work experience student and worked up the ranks via the titles of picture editor, web reporter and road tester. Appreciates a well-executed supermini as much as a lairy supercar. Would rather spend the weekend in the latter.

Comments

TegTypeR June 3, 2009 3:45 PM

I remember being a child and playing I spy out of the car window............

jackjflash June 3, 2009 3:50 PM

Infotainment screens, remote controls, where’s the bidet?

tommallett June 3, 2009 3:54 PM

Mercedes are absolutely the best people at showcasing new technology in their flagship model. And it would seem have been since time began. Some of it carries over into smaller models and some of it becomes a bit of an irrelevance. But either way, long may it continue. Crack on Mercedes with my best wishes.

AverageBloke June 3, 2009 4:17 PM

I think you'll find that Landrover already announced this and have shown the press and public in their 2010 model Range Rover, so they had the jump on Mercedes.

Why are we so good at shouting about German technolgy advances and ignoring British?

Audi Tastic June 3, 2009 4:18 PM

"Yet is this really something that will get used in a car for anything other than showing off to your friends? I doubt it...This means I could be watching Desperate Housewives on my high-def TV from the comfort of my sofa whilst my boyfriend plays Grand Theft Auto on the X-Box on the same screen"

So you want to socially interact with your boyfriend in the car while driving, but not at home?

Why would you not also want to watch 'Desperate Middleaged Garbage' in the car - that way you can avoid speaking to him there too?

scrap June 3, 2009 4:22 PM

What's the view like from the back seat though?

Howey June 3, 2009 5:38 PM

So which is better...the landrover system or the Mercedes system ? ....

only one way to find out...... FIGHT !

Christian Galea June 3, 2009 5:44 PM

AverageBloke: "I think you'll find that Landrover already announced this and have shown the press and public in their 2010 model Range Rover, so they had the jump on Mercedes.

Why are we so good at shouting about German technolgy advances and ignoring British?"

I think you'll find that Mercedes had unveiled the details of the system before Land Rover...just because you first heard about this technology being used in a Land Rover, it doesn't mean they were first...

noluddite June 3, 2009 5:49 PM

The Merc system is supplied by Bosch. I don't know who supplies the Land Rover version but I bet it's also Bosch. I suspect there is no British credit due here.

noluddite June 3, 2009 5:51 PM

'Turned up for work experience here in 2005 and never went home.' <br>

You must be knackered!

ThwartedEfforts June 3, 2009 7:04 PM

The principal reason I sold my W211 S-Class was becase Mercedes had puked so much pointless technology all over it, and here we have the prize winning carrot: a screen for both passenger AND driver that presumably makes where you're going seem rather dull by comparison.

Let's be honest here. Like a mobile phone that connects with Twitter, it's all very tech-nouveau and 'with it' but at the same time so depressingly superfluous to the task at hand. In the case of the phone, communicating with people, and in the case of the car, driving. A bewildering array of options knotted together inside a menu-driven graphical user interface at the heart of something that should make your heart sing - there's just something so awfully clinical and tool-like and German about that.

Looking forward to the next XJ and praying it has a touch screen rather than some stupid ***...

ThwartedEfforts June 3, 2009 7:08 PM

The masked out word above begins with a 'kn' and ends with an 'ob' - the round chrome thing found in the middle of most S-Classes these days ;)

Citytiger June 3, 2009 7:58 PM

I pride myself on trying to keep up with technology, but I am slowly thinking there can be too much of a good thing.  Most cars are driven most of the time with only one person, the driver.  Electrical this, adjustable that, infotainment centres, adjustable throttles, gearbox settings etc.etc.  How many of us actually fiddle about with the settings in our cars? I have got electric memory seats, great but only I drive the car so my seat never gets moved, Tiptronic gearbox that I leave in D, auto climate control that I leave on yes that right auto, change the temperature every so often but that's about it, I have the radio preset to the channel I like and its only a matter of pushing a switch on the steering wheel to get to the other stations I like or to play a CD is equally as easy, I leave the balance, bass, treble and fading as I set it originally, it suits me fine. I havent got a TV in my car, dont think I would want either, Satnav gets used when required, not that often to be honest, but even then I have it set the way I like it and all I do is put in the address and let it sort its self out.

The more there is in a car the more can go wrong, I remember watching  Jeremy Clarkson reviewing some lightweight sports car and saying  roughly the same, " they have used thinner paint, less sound deadening, thinner glass etc.etc, but they have put in a button to control the dampers, a button to sharpen the steering a button for the traction control, 27 modes for the gear box and throttle, why not just have one setting and save even more weight"

Uncle Mellow June 3, 2009 8:45 PM

Mercedes unfortunately have gained a reputation for using advanced technology , and not being able to make it work.

If any of this stuff malfunctions , is your dealer going to be able to fix it ? Will you be without your car while he tries ?

This is not the sort of stuff which made Mercedes successful.  

ThwartedEfforts June 4, 2009 9:28 AM

Citytiger: you just need to look at the second-hand values of today's S-Class to see how in five years' time when these newer cars are worth Fiesta money and the technology crammed inside them is out of date and going wrong, only a fool would choose to get involved with one. It's that maddening short termism again, where a car maker attempts to woo buyers out of their existing, perfectly good cars in return for the exact same experience plus two or three extra toys. Whether buyers are still that gullible is yet to be seen (my guess is not).

Timberwolf June 4, 2009 10:03 AM

I love the technology manifests whenever a new S-class came out.  It's great trying to predict which items will end up on everyday cars and how long they'll take to get there.

In 1990, when your average family car or repmobile was pretty good if it came with electric windows, power steering and a manual sunroof, S-class options and equipment included:

- ABS

- Traction control

- Electric seats

- Airbag

- Dual-zone climate control

- "Eco" gauge

I reckon it'll be the safety kit.  Crosswind control, lane departure (hold on... didn't that filter *up* to the S-class from Citroen?) and the tiredness monitor.  

The TV... not so much.  Infotainment dates quickly - just check out the number of surprsingly recent exec barges that'll be receiving nothing on their analogue television tuners within a couple of years - and for the average family buyer, why fork out nearly a grand for integrated kit when you can just give the kids a portable DVD player?

N0077666 June 4, 2009 10:30 AM

I can see this technology having benefits for public services in the way of police, ambulance drivers etc.  An ambulance driver could have sat nav displayed while the paramedic could be downloading vital information about the accident scene.

It's a shame tho for normal cars as it does take the communication away.  For a driver it makes it much easier on a long drive to stay alert when they have an alert passenger.  I personally just drove a minibus down to Newquay at the weekend, and part of the fun of the trip was the banter on the way down!  All the classics came out, eye spie, my grandmother went to the (sex) shop and bought!, even a game of twister at the services!

N0077666 June 4, 2009 10:33 AM

Also could be great at enhancing two player games.  How much better would gran turismo be with completely seperate views rather than the slighty awkward split screen!

leoleo3 June 4, 2009 2:25 PM

stop  with high end  cars. get to 2010 ford taurs. you show nothing for regular car buyers

theop June 5, 2009 12:52 PM

Mercedes unfortunately have gained a reputation for using advanced technology , and not being able to make it work.

If any of this stuff malfunctions , is your dealer going to be able to fix it ? Will you be without your car while he tries ?

This is not the sort of stuff which made Mercedes successful.  

100% agree to that uncle mellow....

hate gadgets and gimmicks and hitech stuff.... I think they are usaeful, but hate how obsolete they look fo soon after their "this is the future" day.

Was in an 1998 Audi A8 the other day (Finchley minicab company).. It was a car I admired 10 years ago and would have loved to been able to afford then...

But today... its more like "omg, how awful it is".. Everything in it...

So are early noughties Mercedes across the range, Porsche of the 996 vintage etc.. The cars maybe solid, byt their "hitech" bits are ancient even for a Greek...

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 8.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>