Fri
Mar 05 2010

Red Bull F1 at an unfair disadvantage?

Alan Henry
Christian Horner, the team principal of Red Bull Racing, has predicted that Sebastian Vettel and Mark Webber could be battling a performance deficit of as much as half a second a lap when they race against their Mercedes-engined rivals when the new F1 season kicks off in Bahrain on 14 March.

Horner believes that the Renault engined cars – including those of works drivers Robert Kubica and Vitaly Petrov – lost out to Mercedes when the F1 engine specifications were frozen last year and that the rules effectively “froze in” a performance advantage for Mercedes, McLaren and Force India.



Renault reveals Lada F1 car

“This could mean that we are facing a half second a lap deficit to the Merc-engined cars,” said Horner this week. “It would be a great shame if under an engine freeze the outcome of the championship should be determined by engine power when the whole idea is that engines should not be a performance differentiator. You can’t blame Mercedes for that, but you wouldn’t want Renault chased out of F1 because they felt they could not compete either.”

Even so, Christian remains cautiously optimistic that Sebastian is poised to fulfil his potential and  Mark will be right with him.  “The cream always rises to the top,” he grinned knowingly.

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Alan Henry

Our F1 expert has been covering the sport since Lewis Hamilton's father was a teenager (do the maths yourselves on that one), and writing for Autocar since 1994.

Comments

LP in Brighton March 5, 2010 11:10 AM

Engine power might get you to the front of the grid this year, but I suspect that fuel consumption will be more important in the races.  

Any engine performance advantage is likely to be accompanied by increased fuel consumption, which means a higher start weight negating the advantage you had in the first place. Conversely if you have better fuel consumption, you can start the race lighter and gain perhaps a bigger advantage, particularly at the start of the race.

Of course if the Mercedes engine is also more efficient than the Renault, then Horner may still have cause for concern!    

Pity we won't know the actual starting weights and therefore how much fuel each car has on board this year...

Splash n Dash March 5, 2010 11:48 AM

The solution is clear. Unfreeze engine development. This would have several positive outcomes.

1. Healthy competition would mean no engine having an advantage for a prolonged period (3 more seasons with current regs??).

2. If advantage gained it would be seen to be deserved through hard work and not some dubious interpretation of the rules.

3. It would encourage (provide an avenue)manufacturers to return in an engine development capacity. Thereby allowing competing in F1 without going the whole way with running a team- much cheaper.

4.One of the great aspects that makes F1 what it is will be returned.

Only downside is the cost issue but here you could limit the amount spent, say 10 million, for engine development.

Of course the only people not happy with this would be the bean counters..... which would be another advantage of unfreezing the engine regs.

Dave Ryan March 5, 2010 12:05 PM

I seem to recall that Renault's engine was un-frozen (for want of a better word) to allow them to claw back some of the lost ground to Mercedes and the rest. If that was indeed the case I don't think they're going to suffer that much from any performance difference, or if they do it's more down to fundamental issues with the design than not having the chance to develop. Besides, as has been said it will help them on the fuel economy front, and I can't seem to recall the Red Bull being too slow with a Renault engine last year...

Richard H March 5, 2010 12:43 PM

Sounds more like they are making excuses already

Phillip McCavitie March 6, 2010 12:46 PM

Would they swap Newey for a Merc engine?

VirginPower March 7, 2010 3:46 PM

This bears out the stupidity of those who hold forth on Formula One and call for the restriction of innovation and speed in favour of technical blandness and stale uniformity.

I don't need to repeat Splash And Dash's words, as he pretty much says all that needs to be said, and appears to be one of the few people on here who is clever and absorbed enough to appreciate what F1 symbolises.

I'll just add that, more than a performance disadvantage, for which the excellent Vettel can compensate to some degree, I fear an impairment to his Championship chances through lack of reliability.

If Renault engines blight his title hopes as they did last year, the manufacturer will lose all credibility as a customer engine supplier.

MattDB March 7, 2010 9:33 PM

Engine power can alter by how the engine is installed, ie how the engine can breathe can vary the power and torque.  Clearly Brawn, Mclaren and Force India get different results from the same power unit, and so have Red Bull and Renault from theirs.  Don't forget, Red Bull beat Brawn several times in 2009 so this sounds like a lot of 'Bull' from Red Bull.

hellynbaby March 14, 2010 5:28 PM

Hello,

My name is hellyn, i saw your profile here today,

and became interested in you, i will also like to know you the more and estabilish a relationship that is bassed on truth and trust with you, I will give you  my picture for you to know  who iam, when i see your reply,pls i have something very important that makes me to contact you i will like to tell you. I believe we can start from here!Remember the  distance does not matter but love  matters  alot in life, thanks.from hellyn. here is my id....hellyn_john@yahoo.com

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 15.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>