Wed
Mar 03 2010

US F1: the dream that turned sour

Alan Henry
US F1 was always going to be the most difficult of the new teams to get off the ground for the 2010 world championship, but last week America’s latest effort to join the Grand Prix elite finally stalled in the slow lane before ever seeing a test track, let alone an F1 paddock.

I feel huge sympathy for my good friend Peter Windsor over this. Peter, who many years ago was one of Autocar’s most respected sports editors, always had a dream that he wanted to get involved in his own team. For the past 12 months or so, his keen anticipation of 2010 was obvious and the enthusiasm with which he attacked the task consistently unwavering.



But that all came to an end last week when the US F1 operation in Charlotte, North Carolina, stopped answering the telephone and the handful of remaining workers were advised that they would have to take unpaid leave.

Windsor’s business partner Ken Anderson’s optimism was less convincing. One minute he was ‘working with the FIA’ to see how many races the team could be permitted to miss.The next minute he was ‘working with the FIA’ to see if the team’s entry could be deferred until 2011.

Frankly, I would be utterly amazed if the sport’s governing body, having given US F1 a ‘franchise’ it couldn’t live up to, would take any more calls from him. Even assuming the US F1 switchboard was working.

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Alan Henry

Our F1 expert has been covering the sport since Lewis Hamilton's father was a teenager (do the maths yourselves on that one), and writing for Autocar since 1994.

Comments

Harrelson March 3, 2010 10:32 AM

Max Mosley's legacy of encouraging new teams to join overlooked the financial security of some of these new teams to actually afford to participate.

Such incidents have an impact on the glamour of F1 which is what attracts major sponsors. I think Ferrari were justified in their criticism of such poor work from the FIA headed by Max at the time.

dobbie100 March 3, 2010 11:19 AM

Whats makes me mad is that new teams that could have done the job were overlooked in favour of the US team. Of the 3 that were announced in the original set only Manor (now virgin) have been able to turn a wheel on a car that they have built. And even the latecomers Lotus  have managed to produce a running car.  You can bet your house that David Richards could have had a running Prodrive/Aston up and running by now.

The US F1 team should not be considered for  a 2011 slot

MattDB March 3, 2010 1:31 PM

I agree that the biggest loss is that Prodrive were never given a chance as they posess the right stuff when it comes to making this work.  The prospect of Aston Martin in F1 is just as exciting as Lotus as this is a brand with real racing pedigree.

There was even talk of VW coming into F1, and if they did, they could use the Lamborghini name as they too have pedigree in F1 and GT racing.

brinardi March 3, 2010 2:11 PM

I think the problem was that the new teams signed up for what was to become a fixed budget championship but then the goalposts moved and they were left with having to find more money than they had originally budgeted for...

What I really can't understand though is why they couldn't raise more money as some of their backers would make even Bernie look like a pauper.

I think it's a real pity it didn't work out for USF1 as their promised use of the web to give better access to fans would have been interesting...

MattDB March 3, 2010 3:32 PM

Reporting on this shambles kept a few journo's in work for a few weeks.  

Lets find something else to talk about, how about reporting on Schumacher's awful wardrobe which is always worth a few comical soundbites.  Better than talking about USF1 anyway!

disco.stu March 3, 2010 4:10 PM

Not that sure about the Prodrive thing.  They had their chance and didn't take it, so do they really deserve another one?  Also, Renault could have sold their team to Prodrive but went with Genii instead, so maybe there is more to that story that has yet to come to light?

With regards to American involvement in F1, I would love to see a big US operation like Penske or Ganassi give it a proper go, rather than the shambolic USF1 effort.  Surely if Penske put their collective minds to it, they could turn out a slick F1 operation.

Richard H March 3, 2010 5:15 PM

Penske tried in the 70's and then left.

Even then, they knew it couldn't be done in the USA, the car was built in Dorset...

It was a shambles and USF1 should not be granted an entry in 2011

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 15.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>