Wed
Feb 17 2010

Can the absent teams - and drivers - make Bahrain?

Alan Henry

With just over three weeks to go before the F1 teams gather in Bahrain for the opening round of the world championships more question marks are hanging over the participation of both the US F1 and Campos Meta teams, neither of whom are ready to participate in this week’s test at Jerez or next week’s final pre-season session at Barcelona.

This isn’t a matter of life and death in itself, but since neither Campos’s Bruno Senna nor USF1’s Jose Maria Lopez have yet qualified for a super licence, they will both need to cover 300km of ‘observed testing’ before turning up at Sakhir for the opening race. Unless they do that – as Force India’s nominated third driver Paul di Resta was scheduled to complete today at Jerez – then they won’t be permitted to compete at the first race.


Lotus F1 returns; Massa fastest - read the latest F1 testing news

One way out, I suppose, would be for US F1 to buy the Dallara chassis that Campos obviously hasn’t got the cash to pay for, but it’s getting a bit late in the day for that sort of muddled compromise.

Oh yes, and just to be clear, a colleague in one of the established teams confirmed to me this week that he’s trawled through a copy of the Concorde Agreement and there is no – absolutely no –  provision for a team to miss any races; one, two, three, or four.

Jean Todt, the FIA president, has also made this crystal clear. So where this leaves Senna and Lopez, or their teams, is anybody’s guess. A sad state of affairs indeed.

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Alan Henry

Our F1 expert has been covering the sport since Lewis Hamilton's father was a teenager (do the maths yourselves on that one), and writing for Autocar since 1994.

Comments

johnfaganwilliams February 17, 2010 12:14 PM

makes me wonder, yet again, what the skullduggery was that prevented Dave Richards getting a place in the line up. Deep waters indeed when one of the most respected racing organisations in the world is rejected in favour of a bunch of dreamers.

N0077666 February 17, 2010 12:28 PM

"Deep waters indeed when one of the most respected racing organisations in the world is rejected in favour of a bunch of dreamers."

One word... Money!

johnfaganwilliams February 17, 2010 1:15 PM

Nope, don't think it is simply money. Don't think Boothy has more folding than DR! Tied up with Cosworth somehow somewhere methinks

March1 February 17, 2010 1:33 PM

I suspect that DR had too many ideas that weren't compatible with Max Mosely's orders, er sorry...  way of doing things.  

For reference, see Paul Stoddard, Ron Dennis, Flavio (who provided his own means of expulsion)

MattDB February 17, 2010 2:24 PM

The loss of the Prodrive entry was probably a political move to help the FIA's old chums at Ferrari.  Remember Prodrive was due to become the works Aston Martin team, and from a brand perspective that is a bigger on track rival than Mercedes or Renault

Wilkodesign February 18, 2010 10:43 AM

Come on! Get over the FIA / Ferrari link - that's old history. What about the Luca di M - Max Mosely stand-off on budgets last year?

MattDB February 18, 2010 2:45 PM

The FIA/Ferrari link is stronger than ever with Ferrari admitting they get a bigger share of the TV money to ensure they stay on side with Bernie and their old chief Todt now being chief of the FIA.

Prodrive and Aston was a propoer offer to go racing with a properly experienced team who know about winning.  They already possessed the infrastructure and the depth of engineering.  It was foolhardy to vote for a complete start up team over a seasoned outfil like Prodrive and the decision made no logic at all.

I am happy for the return of Lotus but in reality, Prodrive seems a whole lot more credible then them as well, and should easily have been in the pace of Torro Rosso and Force India from the start.  Unlike Virgin and Lotus who seem to be about 7 seconds a lap slower then the slowest of the established teams.

The Colonel February 18, 2010 5:35 PM

Ferrari didn't admit to anything.  Bernie Ecclestone let the arrangement drop in response to Luca di Montezemelo, as Chairman of FOTA, lobbying for a greater share of the television revenue.  Bernie Ecclestone's response being "You got the extra this year, why don't you share it out".

Of course the extra $80milllion is only forthcoming when Ferrari win the Constructors Championship (we wouldn't want people thinking it's a rolling payment, would we), and it was applied in 2003 when Ferrari threatened to walk away.  The other teams knew of it and approved, as Ferrari's history and draw to the sport makes it worthwhile and beneficial to allcomers to have them around.

The very idea that Ferrari somehow managed to convince the FIA (or the FIA just did it on behalf of Ferrari) to put a block on Prodrive/Aston Martin's participation in 2010 because they, Ferrari, were somehow afraid of having a bigger rival brand on the track is just too fanciful for words.  It's a bit desperate really.

softlove010 February 27, 2010 5:50 PM

hello dear friend

How are you today , i know that all is well with you

My name is Gift ,I am a female,I was impressed when i saw your profile  and will like to establishe a long lasting relationship with you. In addition,i will like you to reply me through my private e mail box here is it;(giftbaby09@yahoo.com) Thanks waiting to hear from you soonest.

Gift

Please contact me with my Email address here is it.(giftbaby09@yahoo.com)

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 15.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>