Wed
Jul 29 2009

BMW's gone, who's next?

Alan Henry
The news that BMW will quit F1 at the end of the 2009 season will send a chill wind blowing through the five-star corridors of the sport, inevitably calling into question the future plans of both Toyota and Renault in the longer term.

The news from Munich was certainly no surprise, coming barely six months since Honda quit the sport and sold their operation to Ross Brawn for a nominal fee. It’s too early to say whether the Sauber F1 operation at Hinwil – the Swiss core of the BMW F1 operation – will be spun off into a private team again in the same way, but the clear signal coming from Munich is that you just can’t rely on the major car manufacturers to have an open-ended commitment to the Grand Prix game.



Truth be told, one can see the whole texture and character of F1 changing significantly over the coming years. The fact that Jarno Trulli has been offered a one year extension to his Toyota contract raises inevitable speculation that they will follow rivals Honda out of the sport at the end of 2010.

Thankfully, Lewis Hamilton’s victory in Sunday’s Hungarian Grand Prix will have taken the sting out of any pressure for Mercedes to re-evaluate its F1 involvement, although their position is more complicated and deep rooted as they are shareholders in the McLaren group.

But, on the other hand, I would not like to risk a large amount of money betting that Renault stays in on an open-ended basis. Only as engine suppliers perhaps, as they have done in the past.

This is another signal that F1 needs to re-shape itself.  It must continue and accelerate its initiatives to slash costs and re-trench into a more economically effective business. If that means a bunch of Cosworth-engined privateers making up the field, then so be it.  Better that than a 14 car grid.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Alan Henry

Our F1 expert has been covering the sport since Lewis Hamilton's father was a teenager (do the maths yourselves on that one), and writing for Autocar since 1994.

Comments

theop July 29, 2009 10:55 AM

"This is another signal that F1 needs to re-shape itself.  It must continue and accelerate its initiatives to slash costs and re-trench into a more economically effective business. If that means a bunch of Cosworth-engined privateers making up the field, then so be it.  Better that than a 14 car grid."

Could not have agreed more Alan.

scrap July 29, 2009 10:59 AM

Manufacturers have a fairly poor record as team owners, rather than "just" engine suppliers. It makes you wonder why they bother... an engine supply contract still gives them prestige, access and sponsorship opportunities.

SDR July 29, 2009 11:59 AM

Agreed.  Strikes me that the problem though is Mr Ecclestone, who has saddled the sport with immense commercial baggage based on the money that only manufactuters can pour in.

It should be no surprise that most manufacturers do not - cannot - see F1 as a long term part of their business model - it is NOT their core business, and shareholders will not sanction large scale investment in non-core activities in anything other than the rosiest of times - it is simply not in their interests, as the owners of the companies, to do so.

F1 has been, to use a technical term, utterly screwed over by the commercial rights holder.  I hope there are minds much smarter than mine out there who can work out how to recover F1 back to a genuinely sporting enterprise, rather than a grotesque cash skimming machine.  

Winston July 29, 2009 12:13 PM

"But, on the other hand, I would not like to risk a large amount of money betting that Renault stays in on an open-ended basis. Only as engine suppliers perhaps, as they have done in the past."

Renault have always maintained that being a full constructor with sponsors costs no more than just supplying engines, but with huge benefits for marketing. I suspect they are either fully in or fully out.

JackB July 29, 2009 2:16 PM

Have you forgotten that BMW Sauber F1 cars are driven by a certain couple of drivers? And you reckon there's no need to mention BMW Sauber drivers in an article about their team withdrawal from F1, but of course there couldn't be an article about F1 without mentioning British press' golden boy - Lewis Hamilton!

thenutthatholdsthewheel July 29, 2009 4:19 PM

Can't say I'm too concerned about BMW Sauber's millionaire drivers, its the shop floor staff on standard wages with family and mortgage commitments that we should be focusing on.

thenutthatholdsthewheel July 29, 2009 4:19 PM

Can't say I'm too concerned about BMW Sauber's millionaire drivers, its the shop floor staff on standard wages with family and mortgage commitments that we should be focusing on.

SDR July 29, 2009 4:36 PM

Jack, it may have escaped your notice but Autocar is a British publication/website - who cares about two very well paid and under-achieving  BMW drivers?!  They're not particularly good, or exceptionally interesting, or even slightly British.  I don't much care what Nick Heidfeld is going to do next - he's been an utterly forgettable place-filler for years.  Why should I?

I'm quite sure the German (or any other nation's) press is understandably equally focused on their own drivers, and on exceptional talent from elsewhere.  Heidfeld, and the other guy whose name even now I cannot recall, are neither.  Get over it.

dillonsamben July 29, 2009 5:26 PM

The massive question is: -

Who honestly gives a second hand stuff ?

F1 in years gone by was seat gripping, it was so very exciting that it was very much a MUST watch sport.

Now it is so utterly boring and almost always so processional.

Just one lap of the British bike GP was more exciting and more gripping than the whole blasted year of FI so far.

I honestly see all the manufacturers pulling out and there will be 2 big heads to blame for it all, namely Ecclestone & Mosley.

The Colonel July 29, 2009 5:36 PM

"The fact that Jarno Trulli has been offered a one year extension to his Toyota contract raises inevitable speculation that they will follow rivals Honda out of the sport at the end of 2010."

Or, it could be that a number of drivers have contracts until 2010, and Toyota don't want to box themselves into a corner with a driver on a long contract if someone more tasty comes available.

thenut and SDR, far be it from me to speak up for JackB, but I think you both kind of misunderstood the point of his post.

SDR July 29, 2009 6:07 PM

Hmm... maybe so Colonel...  

Call me old fashioned but I tend to just take things on face value.  If there was some clever 'in' point there, well, I've re-read his post and you're right - clearly it's totally passed me by... ah well!

theop July 29, 2009 8:20 PM

"m quite sure the German (or any other nation's) press is understandably equally focused on their own drivers, and on exceptional talent from elsewhere.  Heidfeld, and the other guy whose name even now I cannot recall, are neither.  Get over it."

SDR he is called Robert Kubica, he is supremely talented - as much as Lewis , by LH admission - and he will probably be snapped up by Ferrari...

Nikonguy July 29, 2009 9:05 PM

I cant say I'm surprised that BMW has been forced to pull out of F1.  Their record speaks for itself

At a guess, I would say Honda will be next

trocadero July 30, 2009 9:03 AM

OK a curve ball here, how about two "Schumacher Ferraris" operating out of the BMW Sauber factory next year with Kubica as one of the drivers and either Raikkonen, Massa or Alonso in the other?

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 8.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>