Autocar - First for car news and reviews

Advertisement

Top bloggers

Advertisement

Wed
Jun 04 2008

Max Mosley: a vote of confidence

Andrew Frankel

I am aware that what follows is not currently a fashionable viewpoint, but part of me that is glad that Max Mosley won the vote in Paris.  For the avoidance of doubt (and leaving aside issues relating to the Nazi allegations until they are substantiated or disproved in court) I’ll say now that I found what he got up to behind what he believed to be closed doors about as far from my cup of cocoa as you can get within the bounds of what was apparently consensual and legal.

I’d say too it would be in the best interest of both the sport and its governing body if he now stood down. Whether it was right or wrong for such revelations to reach the public domain, the fact is they have, you can’t put them back in the box and Mosley’s authority has been permanently weakened.

But I have also tired of the stream of sanctimonious outpourings from those in F1 who have queued up to stand in public judgement over him as if unconventional nocturnal proclivities were in any way unusual in the sport.

I’d also be interested to hear the holier-than-thou views of the armchair enthusiasts compared to those of Heikki Kovalainen, Robert Kubica, Stephane Ortelli and Marc Gene. These are all top level F1 or sports car drivers who, within the last year alone, have escaped either unharmed or with relatively minor injuries from accidents that looked potentially unsurvivable. And I suspect that had these accidents occurred before the Mosley-led FIA forced through night-and-day improvements in car and circuit safety standards, then some or all of them would have been at least fearfully injured and possibly killed.

I don’t know the man and it may well be he is as irascible, unreasonable and autocratic as his critics claim, but it can also be argued he has done more to keep the sport safe than anyone else in its modern history. And I haven’t heard much of that balance coming through of late. It seems many are too busy exhibiting an unseemly and unedifying public pleasure in his fall from grace.

So, in the words of head of the Australian Motor Sport Confederation, Gary Connelly, as one tiny bit of balance right at the end of an otherwise shockingly one-sided report on the allegedly impartial BBC website: “Look, people voted and democracy ran its course. The FIA is a large organisation comprised of many people and I think you've seen a vote of confidence for the president. That's it."

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Andrew Frankel

Talents are limited to "driving cars and writing English." In 19th century France he would, therefore, have been stuffed; as it is, Andrew's the perfect Autocar road test writer.

Comments

andymartin75 June 5, 2008 9:56 AM

I sort of agree with you Capt Frankel. Everybody should be able to have a private life and the tabloid press have clearly over-stepped the mark in secretly filming what was going on. However...

1. You wrote "consensual and legal". What happened was undoubtedly consensual but, as far as I know, prostitution is ILLEGAL.

2. "holier-than-thou "? Who was it slamming Ron Dennis and McLaren in last year's 'spygate' affair?! Oh, that's right, it was 'whiter-than-white' Mosley.

3. After the appalling deaths of Senna and Ratzenburger, those safety changes would have occurred in F1 anyway, although Mosley should be applauded for his efforts.

4. Not entriely sure of the 'democracy' running it's course. The largest organisations that represent the largest number of people get one vote just like the smaller organisations. This means that those majorities are not represented proportionally. Smaller organisations are more easily manipulated, which is undoubtedly what has happened.

Personally, I don't really care what Mosley gets up to in his private life. However, it's not private anymore and unfortunately that could affect F1. If Mosley really does care about F1 and motorsport he should go. Whatever good he can do in the future will always be undermined by this.

Impressed by Bernie in this whole thing.

jerry99 June 5, 2008 12:51 PM

It seems that Max has many friends amongst the representatives of motor sport around the world.

Now those who may have held a long standing grudge against him are complaining and those clubs which have thousands of conservative members but only a loose association with motorsport are said to be considering breaking away from the FIA.

Given Max's close association with the sport and that he has won the vote I would suggest those against him need to find a credible candidate for president to replace him when his term expires or he decides to resign.

Jon Hardcastle June 5, 2008 4:40 PM

I neither like nor dislike Max, but as Andrew Frankel has pointed out he has done alot of good to F1 and has also been seen to alter things that sometimes have not worked out very well, but obviously based on what he has done for the sport he has gained alot of respect and trust of his piers.

If it was my decision,  I would not be asking him to leave.

Andrew F June 5, 2008 8:34 PM

Andy, can't profess to be an expert on the subject but I was under the impression that prostitution was a legal occupation within which lurked many illegal practices, but I may be entirely wrong. Are there any more worldly members of the community who can set us straight on this?

Take your point about democracy tho'.

Jast June 25, 2008 4:43 PM

Nice to see that not everyone has been infected by the kangaroo court (or even lynch law) madness, which has been so evident in many recent proceedings within and about FIA. I think Max Mosley as the FIA president should only be judged upon his professional record and his eventual involvement in illegal activities (although private). The relevant questions in this sad affair – legality and legitimacy of the NOTW being another big issue – would be:

1. Is (this kind of) prostitution legal in the UK?

2. Apparently Mosley has been so overwhelmed that he completely neglected the necessity to retain absolute control of the filmed material. Does this correspond to a profile of a responsible FIA president?

3. Has Mosley in his public and professional work ever shown any sympathy with nationalism, racism or even Nazism?

4. Is the fact that Mosley, after many years as the head of FIA, considers he is irreplaceable before the (re?) election in late 2009 a sign of his greatness in the service of the FIA, or rather a proof of his self-centred careerism and lust for power (among else).

About safety concerns I agree with “andymartin75”. Mosley was simply riding the wave, as any smart politician would do. He cleverly and quite early identified the magnitude of the safety issue and its universal relevance for the sport and the road cars. So, Mosley certainly played a major role, but I wouldn’t dare to give all the credit for the given progress only to him nor to any other particular individual.

Personally I disagree on the so called democracy in the running and decision making at FIA. Voting has been (is) done by individuals who have come to the helm of their respective clubs one way or another, but I am sure that very few (if any) consult their members at least about the most important decisions. So we have a sort of whatever-cracy whose representatives either defend their or their club’s particular interests or just like to get occasional invitation to Paris on someone else’s account.

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - Autocar Cover 8 Oct 2008

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>