Autocar - First for car news and reviews

Advertisement

Top bloggers

Advertisement

Mon
Mar 17 2008

Hybrid F1 cars: more powerful or less reliable?

Alan Henry

FIA president Max Mosley has for a long time demonstrated an unswerving commitment to make the F1 business more eco-friendly and relevant to the car industry than it has been in the past when the pursuit of unfettered power was the only thing which mattered.

Now Max has formally outlined his vision for the future with a raft of new rules which will see the sport travelling down the hybrid route from the start of 2009 season as energy recovery systems will become the only means by which entrants can enhance the performance of their cars.

The development of engines has been frozen, creating a situation meaning that extra power can only be gained by making the better use of energy, or by getting more useful work from the fuel burnt.

Mosley explained: "In 2009, F1 is going hybrid as the first stage of a programme to divert the vast research effort at the pinnacle of motorsport towards energy efficiency. Called KERS (Kinetic Energy Recovery System), this hybrid device is set to revolutionise F1. It will make the sport at once more environmentally friendly, road relevant, and at the cutting edge of future automotive technology."

Max added: "By bringing in rule changes which make these technologies the only means by which a power advantage can be obtained, we can ensure that the outstanding engineers and huge budgets available to F1 will be deployed on energy recovery systems which are directly relevant to the car industry's efforts to reduce CO2 emissions as well as the average motorist's fuel bill."

It will not be compulsory for competing teams to use a KERS system, but as one paddock insider commented, "not to do so would be the equivalent of using a 700bhp engine out of choice rather than an 800bhp engine."

Of course, a 700bhp engine which lasts to the end of a 200-mile grand prix might well be regarded as a better bet than an 800bhp unit that doesn't. It will be interesting to see if any teams find themselves worn down by the complexities of developing KERS systems and take the easy option.

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Alan Henry

Our F1 expert has been covering the sport since Lewis Hamilton's father was a teenager (do the maths yourselves on that one), and writing for Autocar since 1994.

Comments

johnfaganwilliams March 17, 2008 12:27 PM

How does Mad Max square this green nonsense with the ever-increasing pressure to run night races? Lighting a 3 mile track and all ancillary areas must do more damage to the environment - if you believe any of that stuff in the first place - than a few cars driving round self-same track

Cheltenhamshire March 17, 2008 12:31 PM

No motor racing is green....after all you never actually need to have a race, so even a race of electric cars whose power has come from the sun is still a waste of that energy.  But that is beside the point, from a practical point of view....why not, I mean all the cars have ballast added so they reach the minium weight.  Some of this ballast can be removed and this system added.  If there is any chance of refining and or reliability test a new technology that can benefit road car use then go for it Max.

coolGav March 17, 2008 1:31 PM

While the technology is in its infancy, perhaps some teams will adopt a strategy where it's possible for the KERS to fail, but not stop the rest of the car. It would be a bad idea to let KERS dramatically decrease the reliability.

Presumably the whole regulations will be relatively unrestricted, so wildly different systems may be raced against each other. And teams may develop multiple different systems to evaluate the performance differences with other positive or negative effects.

How about qualifying where the out lap is done in a mode that uses the engine to charge the battery/capacitor (assuming the regulations say they must leave the pits with no electrical energy stored) ready for a qualifying mode with a lot more power.

As an engineer I'm happy to see good technology developed and used, but for fans without technical knowledge the whole KERS thing might seem bizarre. For example: why does the Force India easily overtake the Renault down the straight, but under braking it's re-passed, every lap?

carnut March 18, 2008 12:48 AM

Well well well, the 'green' train has finally cought up with motorsport, but what is the point of having a greener formula 1 grid, is formula 1 that much a threat to the environment????? i dont think so, i think the money should be better spent making racing cars lighter more efficient and safer for drivers.

I think Max is looking to jump on the green train for PR purposes only.

As an engineer i know for a fact we are a long way away from having ''good enough'' systems to be used. however in the positive side the development in formula 1 can help bring this technology into road cars. so please keep it on the road and ruin the only motoring pleasure we have left. we cant drive fast, soon we wont be able to afford the cars we love, so please leave formula one alone!!!!!!!.

JJBoxster March 18, 2008 2:13 AM

What racing is there in F1? It's a procession from start to finish. Where you qualify is where you finish, mechanical failure aside, and don't be so rude as to try to overtake, that's against the rules don't you know!

This tedium will be added to by KERS and I expect Max Mosely to have a simliar device to be given out to every F1 spectator to keep them awake during the inane 52 parade laps that pass as 'raczzzzzing'.

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - Autocar 20 August 2008

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>