Mon
Jan 12 2009

Design of the times

Julian Rendell

It looks like we’re in for a few years of cautious and bland US car design, if some of the models on display at Detroit are anything to go by.

Chief offender of these is the Chrysler 200C, a ‘mid-size sedan’ in US-speak, aimed to sell against the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord.

Sized to sit between the bulbous-looking Sebring and retro-inspired 300C, the 200C looks like it dropped out of the same mould used by every other car maker for their family four-doors.

The victory of the Hyundai Genesis sedan in US COTY 09 will only strengthen the hold of that style on mid-size sedan design.

What’s particularly disappointing is that Chrysler has always prided itself on breaking the design mould – one of the advantages of being the smallest of the Big Three.

It’s what saved the company in the 1980s, when it risked all by inventing the minivan segment. It's also what created a golden period of car design in the 1990s when design chief Tom Gale created cars like the Viper, cab-forward LH-family and later design boss Trevor Creed oversaw the 300C.

Of course it’s not surprising that, in today’s vicious downturn, in which Chrysler is the most threatened of the Big Three, 'conservative' is the fallback design position.

Chrysler shut its Pacifica design studio in California last year and the 200C was created at Auburn Hills in Detroit.

A building is just a space, of course; it’s the talent, creativity and company culture that it houses that’s important. But Chrysler is in real need of a transfusion of all these things, and soon.

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Julian Rendell

The man with the legendary contacts book. Once went 'under the wire' to scoop a secret Honda; also navigated a Fiat 127 in a road rally. Says the latter was only marginally more risky.

Comments

manicm January 12, 2009 7:57 PM

I actually think it looks rather good.

shorn sverige January 12, 2009 11:38 PM

If I read your blog right, Chrysler's sin is doing what everyone else is in this segment; why single them out for criticism? And why the 200C - haven't you seen the Sebring? Or anything else: the 300C is the exception.

My question would be why you expected this car to be a mould breaker in the first place. As an enthusiast, it must be painful to concede there are individuals out there for whom a car is little more than a means of transport - but judging by the numbers of Camrys, Accords, & (US) Fusions sold there are quite a lot of them.

Given such howlers as the Imperial concept, what indications are there that they might be able to pull another 300 out of the bag? Yes, it would have been nice if it were easier on the eye - but anything too radical in this segment would have been as appropriate as BMW launching flame surfacing with the 2001 7-Series.

superheater January 13, 2009 3:48 PM

I also think it looks okay..................must be Yank bashing time?

touchwood January 14, 2009 5:48 PM

It's better than the 'revised' Ford Taunus, surely? Not that that is saying much.

As an alternative to a Camry. as shorn sverige says above, it appears OK, but would I want one..... No, I don't think so.

Wicksey February 19, 2009 8:52 PM

That pic of the 200c looks like a vauxhall insignia!

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 8.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>