Sun
Aug 16 2009

First impressions of the Bentley Mulsanne

Chas Hallett
The only other car sitting alongside the new Mulsanne on Pebble Beach’s immaculate turf was the Bentley 8.0-litre. Not just any old 8-litre either. It was only the second one ever made and W.O.’s personal car.

Just to recap, the 8.0-litre was the last car that the company produced before W.O. was forced to sell his company to Rolls-Royce in 1931. The not so subtle message therefore is that this Mulsanne is the first ‘proper’ big Bentley produced at Crewe for nearly 80 years and, according to the company’s current boss Dr Franz-Josef Pfaegen, the sort of car that W.O. himself would have made.



But what are the first impressions? Well the Mulsanne is yet another new car that looks so much better in the metal than it does in the photographs.

In the soft Californian light of Pebble Beach it looked fantastic. Big and muscular, obviously, but graceful at the same time. The whole body is an amazing mixture of sharp creases, giving way to either convex or concurve panels. A lot of them are shapes you can only achieve with a hand built car or by pushing pressing technology to the limit, according to Bentley’s engineering boss Dr Ulrich Eichhorn.

No-one was allowed to sit in the Mulsanne today - they’re saving that treat for Frankfurt motor show - but I saw enough to see that a current Arnage owner is not going to feel displaced. It’s extremely traditional, with the classic ‘T-shaped’ dash layout with all the chrome-ringed dials and turned metal controls inlayed into a single piece of wood.

One pleasing thing is that it looks far more spacious than an Arnage too. Not that difficult to achieve, admittedly, but the Mulsanne is around 30 centimetres longer than an Arnage and it looks like a decent chunk of that has gone into rear accommodation.



What didn’t I like? I’m still not sure about those secondary lights, diagonally down from the main lights. Design boss Dirk van Braekel was quick to point out to me that it’s an old Bentley design cue. Yes, but does it work on a modern car? Then again, judging by the comments I overheard from the Pebble Beach audience I’m in the minority on that one.

Overall though it looks like being a fine effort and if it drives as well as the company bigwigs are privately boasting it’s going to give the new Roll Royce Ghost some extremely stiff competition.

Technorati Tags:

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Chas Hallett

Makes all the big decisions at Autocar, including whether he’ll drive the Aston, or the Kia, home. Is currently preoccupied by small turbo petrol engines and whether the internal combustion engine is doomed.

Comments

justi August 16, 2009 9:30 PM

Vomit.

Vidge 123 August 16, 2009 9:59 PM

I will take the rolls over the this crime against car design any day

Chunkster August 17, 2009 6:45 AM

Ummmmmmmmm, the only thing the design has going for it is its presence. But like anything, make it large enough and it automatically acquires presence.

adam2853 August 17, 2009 9:32 AM

A touch gaudy, in the way that Hitler was a touch naughty.

Maybe its the chrome wheels and gold paint though....

N0077666 August 17, 2009 9:36 AM

I'm with you Chas regards the secondary lights.  Blank them off and I think it is a half decent looking car, but I myself would take the rolls in a design point of view.  To be honest if I could afford something like this I'd go for a Maserati.  Rolls and Bentleys are supposed to be understated elegance, but I think they chase the "presence" factor too much and they are just brash now.  And if I really needed all that space I'd have a specially converted minibus! Could have a jacuzzi in the back, bet the bentley hasn't got one of them!

Now maybe I'm being stereotypical here, but CHas you say you were in the minority of one.  I have a feeling that the sort of person that attends Pebble Beach is a little bit blinkered by luxury and brand.  Bentley could have design a dogs rear end and people would coo and ahh over it, whereas your more grounded readers such as justi, vidge and chunkster realise that luxury and brand aren't the be all and end all of design!

TegTypeR August 17, 2009 9:55 AM

"In the soft Californian light of Pebble Beach it looked fantastic. Big and muscular, obviously, but graceful at the same time."

Unfortunately, get it back to the grey harsh light of British climes, I feel it may not fair so well.  I don't doubt it will look better in the flesh though as it looks plain gaudy in the pictures and I am sure Bentley wouldn't allow that.......  would they?

glorfindel August 17, 2009 12:21 PM

It will be a great success among Californian gansta rappers.

Mart_J August 17, 2009 2:09 PM

I suppose the only thing to be thankful for is that it doesn't look like a Passat or have the Audi gaping mouth. In pictures at least, it doesn't look pretty or  elegant. The front on view looks seriously odd.

Steelydan August 17, 2009 2:15 PM

Why can't Bentley produce something sporty and away from Rolls-Royce completely. The Rolls 200EX or whatever they are gonna call it is far better looking.

Best of luck.

MarkfromFes August 17, 2009 2:35 PM

Hmm. Why did Bentley bring one car in Champagne gold? Of all the colours they could have chosen, this seems to do the car no favours and evokes only beige loafers and golf.

Parking it next to WO's 8 litre is all very well, but I bet that wasn't gold...

The spy shots were of cars in dark colours and looked much better; as does the 50s Flying Spur/Continental, it's inspiration.

I ran two RR's and subsequently a Bentley as everyday cars when I could afford it; I don't regret not being able to buy this!

Alex83 August 17, 2009 3:10 PM

As a huge Bentley fan, in particular the old Conti and Arnage models, I've been really disappointed by their offerings lately, especially the dull Continental range.  So I was looking forward to seeing what they would do to replace the Arnage and am frankly not impressed.  

The front end is hideous, and the rear end looks like a Lincoln Towncar, which is far from a compliment.  Elegant, imposing and purposeful it is not, ugly is certainly is

Lanehogger August 17, 2009 3:37 PM

"Roll Royce Ghost some extremely stiff competition". I thought the Mulsanne was a rival to the Phantom, with the Ghost being a rival to the Flying Spur and cheaper luxury-class rivals like an S-Class and its sister 7-Series?!?!

Either way, i can't say the Mulsanne or Phantom, and indeed the Maybach, are particularly good looking (vulgar perhaps?). But then, Maybach apart, there is a stately and refined elegance about them.

ThwartedEfforts August 17, 2009 3:45 PM

Eek! The front looks like a cheap Chinese knock-off Bentley, the Happy Go SUPER PRISTINE AIR Fancy R Super Droopy Light Edition Turbo.

£14,995 plus shripping and legislation.

(Everything's turning pretty rubbish these days, even fancy motors.)

Leslie Brook August 17, 2009 7:44 PM

Looks like a cheap Japanese Pastiche... should sell loads to 5 star hotels in the Gulf.

Zadster August 18, 2009 5:14 AM

Frankly, the design is too poor for it to be a Japanese copy. With wheels like that it is clearly aimed at the American audience. How long before Bentley up-sticks and move to the US?

Peter Cavellini August 20, 2009 2:21 PM

Fine, if you believe all the waffle,you can word it how you like but its just a reason to charge an obscene amount of cash for what as we all know is a car!, its like calling a dustbin a waste recepticle, and just because a fillet of steel,(they're description, not mine)has to be hand fininshed doesn't mean it's any better, it means they can charge more!

pee September 16, 2009 2:52 PM

the bentley mulsanne is a once in a lifetime oppurtunity of a car

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 17-3

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>