Tue
Apr 21 2009

China's brand-new problem

Matt Rigby
If the 2009 Shanghai motor show has proved one thing, it’s that it’s time to take the Chinese car industry seriously.

The products are now almost uniformly convincing, the reliance on joint-venture products and hand-me-down platforms is dwindling ever more rapidly, and copycat designs are no longer commonplace. There’s only one remaining stumbling block to Chinese companies becoming serious global players, and that’s branding.

It’s understandable, to an extent, that western eyes and ears are going to be troubled by such an alien language and culture, but the Chinese makers will have to deal with this obstacle if they are to become serious forces outside of their domestic market.



JAC, for instance, showed a very credible Mondeo-sized saloon, but it, as far as we can make out, is called the JAC HFC7240. However you spin it, this is not a catchy name. And although the Great Wall Coolbear (pictured above) seems like a genuinely with-it rival to the Scion xB or Nissan Cube, that name sounds more like a 1970s soul singer than a youth-oriented MPV.

Read Steve Cropley's full Shanghai show report

Still, there were definite signs at Shanghai that the Chinese industry is sorting its branding issues. Both Chery and Geely, two of the most internationally minded Chinese car companies, chose Shanghai to launch a range of sub-brands. Chery launched the Karry, Riich and Rely names, while Geely gave us Gleagle, Emgrand and Englon.

They might not trip off the tongue, but these names show that the Chinese are thinking hard about all-important market positioning.

Pronunciation problems may prove a little more difficult to overcome, however. Karry is pronounced Kai-rui, Riich comes out as Rui-qi, while Rely, rather astonishingly, becomes Wei-lin. Just shows the branding tightrope any Chinese company wanting to export to world market is going to have to walk: how do you stay Chinese, while making sense to a western audience?

There is an amusing by-product of the pronunciation problem: SAIC’s choice of Roewe as the replacement for the Rover badge. That, ironically, should be pronounced ‘wrong way’.


Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Matt Rigby

Sold his beloved Nissan 200SX in order to afford to work at Autocar. Also has a masters degree in automotive journalism, so he's better qualified than the rest of us combined. Currently works at Pistonheads.

Comments

manicm April 21, 2009 3:21 PM

The above is an exact clone of a Cube, not to mention Geely's 'Rolls'.

It's disgusting but who cares? These will sell in China where it matters.

Timberwolf April 21, 2009 3:56 PM

They'd surely be best served to buy an existing European brand with respected heritage, an existing and familiar model line-up to extend and (most importantly) a distribution network than try to build it all up from scratch... after all, it's not like such things aren't up for grabs at the moment.

thenutthatholdsthewheel April 21, 2009 7:50 PM

A Chinese car firm could do worse than buy Saab, if only for the name.

With some effort and investment it ought to rival Audi.

Monk April 22, 2009 7:12 AM

Daft names never stopped the Japanese or Korean car makers making an impact. Come to think of it, some of the Euro brands have used some pretty stupid names in the past as well.

A few early names that come to mind and did no harm are Violet, Cherry, Applause, Arno, Pony, and if SSangYong manages to sell anything then surely the Chinese can.

Collapsing like a wet paper bag in a crash test is likely to be more of a problem than names. Easier to change a name than to re-engineer a dud.

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 8.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>