Wed
Mar 10 2010

Why is BMW 'premium downsizing'?

Hilton Holloway
‘Premium downsizing’ is one of the hottest buzzwords in the car industry. The theory is that premium car buyers are willing to either drive smaller cars or drive the same size car with a smaller engine.

The first ‘premium downsized’ car was probably the Mercedes A-class back in 1998. Although technically innovative, the project ran up huge losses for Mercedes. The new-generation A-class will be more conventional under the skin and spawn a wider choice of models.



BMW, fresh from its disastrous ownership of Rover Group, was sure that it would never put its badge on a front-drive car. The 1-series – effectively a downsized 3-series – was probably the smallest a rear-wheel drive car could be.

Indeed, it was christened 1-series to prove that BMW would never build a smaller car, a move backed up by a series of punchy ad campaigns declaring rear-wheel drive to be ‘standard’. Anything else, BMW suggested, was an aberration in a premium car.

So the news that BMW looks set to build its own baby front-wheel drive car (based on the next generation Mini) is a massive about-face for the company. The reasons why are not clear.

Does BMW need to bolster its Mini operation, by boosting the number of cars produced on the (expensive and sophisticated) Mini platform? Does it perceive a real threat from the pint-sized Audi A1? Is the premium downsizing trend more marked than the industry guessed?

One thing is more certain. Premium carmakers no longer believe that size matters. Small and sophisticated can command premium prices. Indeed, if an entry-level Mini can sell for £11,000, an entry level Mini-based BMW could probably command £13,000 or more, a very handy price premium.

And there could be more to come from the Mini stable. At Geneva there was plenty of industry chat around BMW’s not-quite-dormant Triumph and Riley brands. Could the Mini operation be further expanded via a notchback Riley Elf, or a baby Triumph Roadster based on the Mini cabriolet?

Perhaps BMW will stop at nothing to expand its 250,000 a year front-drive Mini production towards 500,000 and long-term financial health.

Whatever happens, it’s unlikely BMW will downsize quite a far as the Triumph Spitfire Roadster pictured here. Small and sophisticated is one thing. Spartan is quite another.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Hilton Holloway

Has two product design degrees and used to design mountain bikes. Realised that cars were a lot more interesting in 1990, and has been writing about them ever since.

Comments

nicksheele March 10, 2010 4:26 PM

Why is BMW 'premium downsizing'?

- emissions regulations.

Have you seen what the US is proposing for 2016? The only way BMW will continue to be able to sell X5s and the like by then is to sell many sub-100g CO2/km small cars, hence the small fwd BMWs.

Bigchiefmuffin March 10, 2010 4:31 PM

The Mini has been a success, but it is limited by the fact that it has to "look" like a Mini, which means limited rear legroom and a small boot. For some people, this is fine. But for some potential "premium downsizers", this is a problem and BMW knows it.

So, rather than loose sales to a Fiat 500, a more sensible shaped small car, on the Mini platform but badged BMW must make some sort of sense.

Why they might want to badge it Riley or Triumph is beyond me....

disco.stu March 10, 2010 4:31 PM

Or they could downsize their overall range by dropping the X6...

david RS March 10, 2010 5:55 PM

They may then extend the FWD to other segments to win in emissions (to avoid penalties), in costs, in passive safety ...

But this won't be BMW.

You know, Peugeot, Renault, VW make good small FWD.

Sadly, this uniformity. This is the beginning of the end. We live nowadays a revolution.

Challenger440 March 10, 2010 8:18 PM

Why is BMW 'premium downsizing'?   Cos' that's where the money is...  

chris333 March 10, 2010 9:27 PM

Spitfire...spartan...I think you will find that compared to the MG Midget the Spitfire was positively luxurious!

Giom37 March 10, 2010 9:30 PM

The problem with BMW is that they're a clever company. A lot of times they say stuff on purpose to guage reaction and get a feel for the idea. Other times they say stuff to distract from their real plan.

In the end, they'll do what is best for them and their costomer.

HiltonH March 10, 2010 9:59 PM

Interesting point, Scheele. Any further details off of the top of your head?

chris333 - Triumphs were 'luxurious' in their day. When luxury was a wood dash, nicer carpets and more chrome....

Still think its a brand ripe for revival. I did some research into it 19 years ago for my post-grad course. What was interesting was that Triumph doesn't carry any brand baggage, unlike, say Austin.

All Triumph owners seemed to have nothing but good memories about their cars. The stupid move that killed it was using the Rover badge for the 1984 Honda/Rover 213/216. ARG should have stuck with Triumph and only used Rover badges on the bigger cars.

manicm March 10, 2010 10:05 PM

This is one instance where BMW is guaranteed to shoot itself in the foot.

It's expanding the Mini lineup, so why create an essentially re-badged Cooper? It will only steal Mini sales, and cheapen BMW's image - people will say oh look, now BMW's only as good as a Golf, now that they make FWD too.

Hell a Golf 6 IS better than a 1-series anyway, and VW have also pushed it upmarket - it's no Corolla.

Giom, on this evidence BMW is clearly not as clever as it thinks.

Like Aston Martin with their Cygnet, one has to wonder what exactly BMW is smoking with this plan.

manicm March 10, 2010 10:12 PM

Oh, and regarding emissions, they don't need a sub-1 series car to achieve their aims:

Hasn't AC previously reported that the new 1-series might have 3-cyl power, in fact as far as I can remember the next 3-series might have it as well.

Also, I read elsewhere it's not guaranteed that the following 1-series will be RWD.

So again - what is BMW trying to achieve with a sub-1 series FWD car when it has a Mini range??

david RS March 10, 2010 10:18 PM

To try miserably to amortise the Mini platform.

HiltonH March 10, 2010 10:25 PM

manicm

Three-pot BMWs are on the way as far as we have been told. Mercedes is still wondering. They say that the extra NVH measures (including extra work on the car's structure) could make three pots an expensive option.

chris333 March 10, 2010 11:06 PM

Hilton,

Having had  a spitfire for 17 years (last 5 untaxed in the garage), i completely agree with you. Even when I just drive it up and down the drive, I smile. The early-mid 70s range of cars, whilst of course being just as rubbish as all the other BL stuff, was at least look sporty and stylish: think Spitfire (cheap but looked good ..to me anyway), Stag (nice V8, horribly unreliable), Dolomite Sprint (16V engine), TR6 (yummy straight six) etc. I even have soft spot for the TR7. As you say, a sad end in the 80s. I'd love to see it come back

Uncle Mellow March 10, 2010 11:07 PM

Premium downsizing ? BMW have been "premium upsizing" for years , hence the 3-Series is as big as the original 5 and the new 5-Series is surely bigger than the original 7.

artill March 10, 2010 11:54 PM

I too would like to see Triumph come back, having owned many. It would make a lot of sense for BMW to use the Triumph brand on bigger FWD cars instead of diluting the BMW name by going FWD, and yet at the same time they can get away from the styling constraints of 'Mini' which seems to make each new model harder to develope.

But as BMW only do 'premium pricing' i doubt they would be of any interest to me.

Old Toad March 11, 2010 5:25 AM

I think downsizing is a sound marketing move as the sheer rising costs of motoring are forcing people into smaller cars .

The secret to profitability on these small cars will be their options lists . I mean who buys a bog standard Mini and I bet the Audi A1 will have an equally expensive and extensive options list.

Surely BMW are just trying for accurate product placement to meet forthcoming demand . FWD sacrilage to some but no doubt profitable to BMW.

Money money money always money.  

chandrew March 11, 2010 7:38 AM

Three things sprung to mind:

My first thoughts were 'wow, a new Spitfire!'.  A late 1500 was the first car I bought and I had a wonderful time in it.  I learned how to drive RWD and much of the servicing (the front opening bonnet made this very easy).  Sure, compared to other things not the best handling (though didn't the Lotus Elan use the spitfire steering?) but it took many years before I owned something as much fun again.

Second, I'm not sure that manufacturers should be so surprised at the downsizing trend.  Sure there is the economical perspective but now every car is the size of the next model up (eg a modern 3 is as big as a 5 a few models ago) people want to trade down to a smaller car.  Maybe, just maybe they were happy with the original size?  

Finally, just a thought.  If BMW went with electric motor power, in either full EV or series hybrid format couldn't they use the mini platform and still have RWD, a similar format to the Lotus / Proton concept.  There are plenty of advantages with RWD for city cars, not least the possibility of a tiny turning circle (like the spitfire had).  This way they continue their existing RWD positioning and make a meaningful contribution to reducing overall CO2 emissions.

Latebreaker March 11, 2010 8:09 AM

I havent got a problem with BMW downsizing, however if isnt going to be RWD, then they cant badge it as a BMW.

230SL March 11, 2010 9:19 AM

Hopefully this will mean they are upsizing inside.

streaky March 11, 2010 12:36 PM

I have very fond childhood memories of relatives' Triumphs in the '60s; 1300s and 2000s with their Michellotti styling, refinement and great interiors which blended comfort and wood veneer luxury with modernity.  What a shame it all ended in British Leyland's silly badge engineering and disastrous deterioration in quality.

The Riley badge is now so old that it would be impossible for it to carry any baggage but was already reduced to farcical badge engineering by the late '50s.  However, with the current obsession manufacturers have with radiator grills, an adaption of the interesting shapeley item with its blue diamond badge that used to adorn Rileys would look far better than the gaping gob on today's Audis.

noluddite March 11, 2010 2:05 PM

They're downsizing because it's the only end of their range they can extend. Even the 3 is gigantic in comparison with the little Spit.  

tuga March 11, 2010 3:01 PM

Sing it with me!

" Money-money-money-money...

MONEY! "

hellynbaby March 14, 2010 5:25 PM

Hello,

My name is hellyn, i saw your profile here today,

and became interested in you, i will also like to know you the more and estabilish a relationship that is bassed on truth and trust with you, I will give you  my picture for you to know  who iam, when i see your reply,pls i have something very important that makes me to contact you i will like to tell you. I believe we can start from here!Remember the  distance does not matter but love  matters  alot in life, thanks.from hellyn. here is my id....hellyn_john@yahoo.com

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 15.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>