Autocar - First for car news and reviews

Advertisement

Top bloggers

Advertisement

Wed
May 21 2008

Our Bentley sets sail

Steve Cropley

 

Well, it’s big. And unimaginably luxurious. It’s a week since I drove our new Continental Flying Spur away from the Jack Barclay dealership in west London after a couple of hours of pre-ownership pampering – and 1000 miles have passed since – but I couldn’t remotely claim to have settled into any kind of a routine of Flying-B ownership.

You’ll be able to read the full story in the ‘Our Cars’ section of the magazine, but we’ll be running our ‘new’ Continental Flying Spur for six months as a very upmarket ‘nearly-new’ alternative to an S-Class or 7-Series.

Our Conti is already two-and-a-half years old, but has barely 13,000 miles showing. Rumour says it’s spent its previous life in the hands of the royal family, although the blokes at JB were to discreet as to actually name the names who travelled in the back – or occasionally slipped behind the wheel.

Our Flying Spur is pretty much identical to the car in which Andrew Frankel once broke the 200mph barrier in, four-up, around the Nardo test track in Italy – confirming that it’s the world’s quickest saloon.

The issue for us is whether the compromises necessary to keep a big saloon stable at nearly three miles a minute are reflected in the way the car drives in suburban London.

And how does a car that cost more than £120,000 when new feel against luxury cars that match its current £80,000 value?

First impressions are overwhelmingly positive. The beautiful tan interior impresses everyone – and the enormous boot has to be the biggest on the market. The smooth start-up hum of the W12 turns every head within earshot, too – and fuel economy (up to 20mpg under gentle use) isn’t as disastrous as I had expected.

There’s more road-rumble than I’d expected, although I’m sure I’ll get used to it, and parking would be helped by the reversing camera that more modern luxury saloons get as standard.

But what a great way to spend half a year’s motoring…

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Steve Cropley

Road tester of 35 years and columnist of 15, Steve says he’s as much in love with cars today as he was on day one. “And not just the cars, but also the industry that makes ’em.”

Comments

ThwartedEfforts May 22, 2008 8:41 AM

Having bought a Phaeton W12 after it had shed more than 50% of its sticker price in just 18 months, I'm not sure I could pay four times as much again for the same thing with chrome vent stoppers and a winged 'B' on the front. The W12 is a dismal lump, not so different from the BMW V12 in the Silver Seraph, its one saving grace being great gobs of power at almost any speed.

In addition, the GT and Flying Spur are no more British than the Royal Family, but I'd certainly have a used Spur over an S-Class. The flared-arched Benz is a car fêted by journalists but which is spoiled utterly by a spray of pointless gimmickry (COMAND's menu-driven UI), a total lack of stuff you might actually need (no Bluetooth), a clunky 7-speed gearbox, and the fact the driving experience is the same as its predecessor.

David Harrington-Wright May 22, 2008 10:58 AM

If you need anyone to "look after" it whilst you are away, don't trust any of your fellow Journos down there, send it up here to Beautiful North Wales, I'll even give it a wash!!!

NAK May 22, 2008 11:13 AM

Interesting to note that Car Magazine have just started to run a used Continental, cost £79k with 13k on the clock - Bentley promoting their used car scheme?

qwerty2008 May 23, 2008 9:25 AM

ThwartedEfforts, obvioulsy you didn't notice the lack of two turbo's in your Phaeton which the Bentley has or the very different interior. Not to mention the drive.

And as for Britishness, Its good to see people like you are supporting British manufacturing, by buying Phaetons. Where do you think Bentley's are built? Although a large amount of Engineering is done in Germany there are 4000 British people employed at Crewe. I think that makes it pretty British.

ThwartedEfforts May 23, 2008 1:45 PM

First, the Continental is a car built on a German car platform, itself a derivative of some other platform whose name I forget but which is probably underpinning something relentlessly drab like an A8.

Second, the Bentley does have two hair driers under the bonnet and various Dunhill accoutrements to make it appear less Phaeton-like, but it's basically a Phaeton. Both cars have the same iffy ride quality, both share a user interface from the 1990s that makes you wonder if iDrive wasn't such a bad idea after all, and comparing them is like comparing the Silver Seraph with the Arnage. They are the same car, regardless of the fact one's smoking a Cuban and the other's smoking a sausage.

I don't quite understand your second paragraph. Buying any second-hand vehicle has no effect on manufacturing because the used car trade is a service industry, not industry itself.

As for identity, the Continental was designed by Dirk van Braeckel and the company's president is Franz-Josef Paefgen, both of whom have fine Cheshire surnames. The fact Mr Paefgen posts 4,000 cheques to British addresses each month doesn't make the car any less Teutonic.

qwerty2008 May 23, 2008 9:51 PM

You make some interesting points Mr Efforts. I don't have the patients to answer them all. However, where do the spares come from for your used VW?

To think that platform sharing is the route of all evil & makes a car less British is simple naive. Would you rather those 4000 poor souls work in a call centre?

Like the Clarkson’s of this world, you’re the first to complain about the decline of British manufacturing. However when a car is engineered and built in this country, better than the Germans or Japanese can, as in Nissan's Sunderland plant & Crewe.  It’s still not enough for your support.

ThwartedEfforts May 24, 2008 12:25 AM

I never said platform sharing was the root of all evil, I said the Continental is a Phaeton. I don't have the big VW any more because it and I never clicked, despite me thinking I'd fall in love with it. Long story short, it's not very good. I also never complained about the decline of British manufacturing. Generally speaking if someone's not very good at something, they end up having the competition run rings round them and then giving up. That's what happened to us.

Viscount Biscuit May 26, 2008 10:51 PM

Regardless of where it is built or who signs the pay-cheques. This car is not a Bentley. I'm in no doubt that it is superbly engineered, exceedingly reliable and registers half a notch below perfection but it doesn't have the brutish sophistication of an Arnage or even the last Continental.  Both the Continental GT and Flying Spur look too crass to be Bentleys.

barina June 18, 2008 7:36 AM

thwartedefforts, if the Bentley Continental GT "is [no more than] the same car as a Phaeton", you'd really have to ask yourself why the Phaeton didnt sell, whereas the Marque Bentley is going gangbusters. I dont recall seeing a drophead Phaeton, or a coupe Phaeton. I think you got suckered into buying the VW, and just have sour grapes about it now, trying to be-little Bentley. "dismal lump" and "hair dryers" describing turbo chargers, aimed at the W12 engine make me wonder what would press your buttons.

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - Autocar 26 Nov

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>