Mon
Mar 15 2010

BMW's 5-series Touring appeals

Chas Hallett
Maybe it’s my advancing years but there’s something extremely appealing to me about posh estates. A car for all reasons sort of approach.

It was one of the reasons that I was so keen to have a sneak preview at the new BMW 5-series Touring the other day. That, and, unlike my colleagues here, I still haven’t had a really good crawl over the new 5-series full stop.



BMW 5-series Touring - full details and pics

What I found was a thoroughly convincing car. The new Five is yet another car that you really have to see in the metal to appreciate its looks. It’s far more elegant and handsome than the outgoing one – especially as a wagon.

And, just like the saloon, it’s roomier, quicker, greener. You get the picture.

Just as interesting though was chatting to the marketing bods about who buys the wagon over the saloon.

Touring buyers, apparently, are younger (average age 47, compared to early fifties), much more likely to participate in sport, have a more active life, be more likely to be paying their own money for the car and, generally, display more loyalty to BMW and the format than the four-door owners.

Some of that I would have guessed, mind you but even so.

A slightly thornier issue for the BMW sales force is the presence of the 5-series GT this time around. That, after all, is also a more practical version of the saloon. The marketing types reckon it will appeal to a different sort of customer, the GT being bigger in the back and pricier too. I’m not so sure though.

I think BMW’s in danger of eating its own lunch having the Touring and the GT in the same line-up. But we’ll have to wait and see.

Either way, the Touring’s probably going to be on my wish list. And not just because I want to look young and sporty either…

Technorati Tags: , ,

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Chas Hallett

Used to make all the big decisions at Autocar, including whether to drive the Aston, or the Kia, home. Now editor-in-chief at sister magazine, WhatCar?.

Comments

Latebreaker March 15, 2010 12:41 PM

I quite like to look of the new 5 saloon and Touring. Some have said its a step back from the previous model, but if it wasnt in M Sport spec, it looked weak.  

Though if your after a premium estate, then I think the new E-Class would be a better all rounder.

IMO, I would sacrifice the practicality of the estates and get a Jaguar XF.

chandrew March 15, 2010 2:38 PM

I've never really understood what the saloon offered over the Touring, though it doesn't surprise me that private buyers prefer the Touring.  (In markets like here in Switzerland where there are few company cars the Tourings seem much more popular.)

As regarding the GT I would imagine that BMW anticipate it taking some saloon sales given the comments regarding commitment of Touring buyers to the format.  I suspect that they are expecting a fair number of GT buyers to be downsizers from the class above.

Regarding the E class estate, it does have a perception problem given the very high proportion of taxi drivers who use them in places like Germany and Switzerland.  I guess that they chose it because of quality and cost of running but I know several friends who have A6 and 5 series Tourings who didn't consider the merc for this reason.

Andy Lever March 15, 2010 4:40 PM

When looking at all previous generations in Autocar's photographs, the 2010 version is the most cohesive. Previous versions look like the boot was designed in afterwards

The specification levels on the touring models tends to be higher (marginally, but it is), than sloon equivalent.

Look forward to haveing a look at one close up

Rover P6 3500S March 15, 2010 6:00 PM

The 5GT is bigger in the back? Well, this must be bloody cramped, then! I sat in the back of a 5GT at my excellent local BMW dealer (Cooper Cobham , Surrey - thank you for many years of unfailingly fantastic service!) and found that my head, when leaning against the headrest, was also jammed against the roof. And I'm not quite 5ft 10 - hardly a giant. I spoke to various sales people there and their opinion seemed to be "We'll have an even harder job shifting this abomination, this prostitution of the BMW brand, than we will the X6". So, if this isn't as roomy, it must be even more cramped than my E46 318i Touring is in the back (and that's no Rolls-Royce, believe me). Admittedly, I didn't try moving the 5GT's seats about, but it seemed incredibly cramped (not to mention hideously ugly from all angles - or should that be Bangles?). Bring back the days of truly desirable BMWs (look at the late-90s lineup...)!

Overdrive March 15, 2010 7:34 PM

"....I think BMW’s in danger of eating its own lunch having the Touring and the GT in the same line-up. But we’ll have to wait and see...".

I tend to agree. Might be a very good car, but never could see what the GT can do that the Touring can't do at least as well.

tony2x March 17, 2010 7:34 AM

I don't understand the need for the GT, it smells like a big, expensive Vauxhall Signum to me.  But then I've never really understood the desire for SUVs/Crossovers or whatever segment the GT is supposed to be in, when you can have a nice estate car.

I love this new Touring, it looks great!

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 15.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>