Autocar - First for car news and reviews

Advertisement

Top bloggers

Advertisement

Thu
Jun 26 2008

Crossed wires

Mike Duff

There aren’t many areas of the automotive world where Britain still rules the waves, but the lightweight sportscar is one of them.

x_bow012a It’s a thought triggered by the first drive of the Austrian KTM X-Bow, a car that I’m struggling to see the point of in a big way.

At risk of sounding a mite xenophobic, foreigners just can’t do these motorised bedsteads as well as we can. Back in the mists of motoring history, Britain’s anti-car taxes created a trend of lightweight specials, stripped down versions of normal cars with their meagre performance offset by added lightness.

In the ‘50s Colin Chapman gave a new direction to the genre with the Lotus Seven. Which, give or take some carbonfibre bodywork and a Ford Duratec engine, is still going strong as the Caterham 7.

Other manufacturers climbed aboard the bandwagon – and occasionally fell off it. Caterham ended up suing a couple for the uncanny resemblance between their products and the official Seven.

And then the Ariel Atom appeared – getting rid of bodywork itself in the cause of lightness. It was, both literally and figuratively, the coolest thing to happen to the sportscar in years.

x_bow002aSo why would anybody want to spend £50K on a car that lacks the Atom’s minimalist design chic while sharing its near-total lack of real-world practicality?

To my eyes, the Austrian-built KTM looks clumsy and contrived: like an Atom that’s been sent out in testing distinguish. The standard of finish might be high, and it’s certainly not lacking in performance, but as a trackday tool it’s appeal is going to be limited to those with deep pockets and limited imagination.

It reminds me of the (non) contest between two other lightweight sportscars in the mid-1990s, when the Renault Sport Spider got its nose bloodied by the Lotus Elise.

I don’t see this one ending any differently.

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Mike Duff

The incoming editor of autocar.co.uk started life in radio news, but found doorstepping bereaved mothers too much like hard work and opted to scribble about cars instead. He joined Autocar in 2007 and reckons that big-engined diesels are the future.

Comments

julianphillips June 26, 2008 5:15 PM

Not sure about this.  The KTM looks fantastic in my eyes, the only off-putting thing is the price.  As for the the Renault Spider of the 90's, I can't remember anyone even remotely seriously considering it as a rival for the Elise.  It was massively compromised by being far too slow (seem to remember 7ish seconds 0-60) for a car without no windscreen or roof.

The KTM has stunning performance, and although £50k looks expensive next to an Atom (or Elise), its a bargain next to something like the Caparo.

phenergn June 26, 2008 7:24 PM

I am inclined to agree. The X-bow looks like a truely fine car, and an awsome track day tool, but £55k for what ammounts to a track car?

That's a good £25,000 more than an Arial Atom 300, and £17000 more than a Caterham R500, both of which would destroy the X-bow on a track.

£55000 was the asking price of the Noble M400. A car that offered both more performance and infinately more practicality on the road. At £35000 the X-bow would be a real contender, but at this price I can't see the appeal.

Andrew F June 27, 2008 1:58 PM

I think the cost of the X-Bow even with essential extras (lsd, adjustable shockers etc) will be nearer £45k but that's still more than its most immediate rivals and you're right about the Caterham and Ariel leaving it for dead. Even so KTM swear it's substantially quicker around Ascari than a Lotus 211 which, if true, astonishes me.

I will, however, say two things in its defence: first the quality of its engineering is quite beyond anything I've seen in such a car - it feels like it would do two days lapping the Nurburgring and feel as good on the last lap as the first. Second, being surrounded by a carbon-fibre monocoque as you turn into a corner at 120mph reassures in a way a framework of metal tubes never could. That said, even if it stopped you hurting yourself when you threw it in the wall, I expect the cost of repairing that tub would bring a pain all of its own...

Joe Pearce July 1, 2008 4:50 PM

We are of course forgetting one major aspect of this car, that niether Caterham, nor Ariel, are even bit players on the continent. After having lived in europe for 4 years, I have only seen one Lotus 7 and a british registered Westfield. The X-Bow is a much more hardcore alternative to the Elise and such, and a more agressive looking, better quality alternative to the 2-Eleven.

Over here, I'm sure it will sell well, and maybe even steal a few sales off of Porsche as a second car,

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - Autocar 26 Nov

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>